Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Question about the opening scene in Inglorious Basterds.. | Page 2 | Movie/TV Board
Started By
Message

re: Question about the opening scene in Inglorious Basterds..

Posted on 8/13/25 at 2:29 pm to
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
119977 posts
Posted on 8/13/25 at 2:29 pm to
quote:

but by his own admission he took his role very much as a "job" and the job was done, albeit except for Shoshanna.


I think he intentionally let Shoshanna go just so he could hunt her later.

quote:

I always wondered if he recognized her in the restaurant later on.


I think he did and had a pretty sadistic plan for both her and Zoller (the later for standing up to him) on the night of the premiere where he’d expose Shoshana in front of the High Command and destroy Zoller’s reputation and breaking his heart. But then he found out that the Basterds were coming to the premiere and knew he had much bigger fish to fry than her and Zoller.
This post was edited on 8/15/25 at 12:36 am
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
119977 posts
Posted on 8/13/25 at 2:33 pm to
quote:

That's part of the suspense/tension of the scene but I don't think he lets things go on nearly as long as they do with her if he did.


Well if Landa did know that was Shoshana, where was she going to go? As far as Landa was concerned (assuming he knew), he had her cornered.

quote:

Definitely never would have allowed Hitler to enter into her theatre.


Unless he had his own plans that directly involved Hitler and the High Command. Germany was basically guaranteed to lose the war at this point, and Landa was looking for ways out.
Posted by ATrillionaire
Houston
Member since Sep 2008
2818 posts
Posted on 8/13/25 at 2:34 pm to
He's not a true believer. He admits he has no personal animus toward Jews, and that he is simply very accomplished at hunting them.

He's ambitious and totally in the game for adulation.

A true believer wouldn't negotiate their conditonal surrender with terms that give credit for being a double agent and contributer to Operation Kino. He wanted citizenship, a medal, and Nantucket property.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
119977 posts
Posted on 8/13/25 at 2:34 pm to
quote:

He gets incensed at Aldo for killing his phone operator after making a deal for both of their lives. I'd lean toward them letting the LaPadite's survive.


Yeah, I think that’s the best evidence that he didn’t kill the family. As fricked and evil as he was, I think to a certain extent that Landa was largely a man of his word. That and terror I think were his currency as an SS officer.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
114003 posts
Posted on 8/13/25 at 2:35 pm to
Always figured he killed them
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
119977 posts
Posted on 8/13/25 at 2:37 pm to
quote:

LaPadite clean up the bodies than to do anything else to him and his family.


I mean, he was explicitly eye fricking his daughters (not that I think Landa found them attractive and just used it as a threat) who if LaPadite didn’t give up the Jews, then I think would have sicked his men on them and had them raped.
Posted by ATrillionaire
Houston
Member since Sep 2008
2818 posts
Posted on 8/13/25 at 2:38 pm to
quote:

I think he intentionally let Shoshanna just so he could hunt her later.

He didn't let her go on purpose (to hunt her). This is a cut scene from the movie.

This post was edited on 8/13/25 at 2:41 pm
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
119977 posts
Posted on 8/13/25 at 2:41 pm to
quote:

He didn't let her go on purpose. This is a cut scene from the movie.


Ehhh, Tarantino changes his mind from his scripts pretty regularly. Landa’s men could have easily charged her down.

Plus Landa says “Au Revior” which means “Until we see each other again.” That doesn’t make sense if he’s just sending his patrol looking for her and capturing or killing her ten minutes later. It’s all about the thrill of the hunt for Landa.
This post was edited on 8/13/25 at 3:16 pm
Posted by ATrillionaire
Houston
Member since Sep 2008
2818 posts
Posted on 8/13/25 at 2:45 pm to
quote:

Ehhh, Tarantino changes his mind from his scripts pretty regularly. Landa’s men could have easily charged her down.

It's not deleted from the script. It was cut during production due to time constraints. The scene was filmed.
This post was edited on 8/13/25 at 2:46 pm
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
149794 posts
Posted on 8/13/25 at 2:46 pm to
Always have gone either way and neither choice would be a surprise to me

He always seemed like an evil heartless person on a power trip who easily could have killed the family just because he could

He also seemed more inherently interested in just getting the job done who wouldn't have taken the deception personally and would have just moved on to the next situation

So...idk
This post was edited on 8/13/25 at 2:48 pm
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
128927 posts
Posted on 8/13/25 at 2:47 pm to
My assumption has always been he let them live as well.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
119977 posts
Posted on 8/13/25 at 2:50 pm to
quote:

It's not deleted from the script. It was cut during production due to time constraints. The scene was filmed.


Well he says “Adieu” to LaPatite and the Jews and “Au Revior” to Soshana. I’m just taking Landa’s words quite literally here.
Posted by ATrillionaire
Houston
Member since Sep 2008
2818 posts
Posted on 8/13/25 at 2:52 pm to
quote:

Well he says “Adieu” to LaPatite and the Jews and “Au Revior” to Soshana. I’m just taking Landa’s words quite literally here.

That can very well mean that he'll see her again as she will be captured, killed, or will die in some other fashion. Interesting observation, though. Who knows.
Posted by Carson123987
Middle Court at the Rec
Member since Jul 2011
67917 posts
Posted on 8/13/25 at 3:01 pm to
Nope. Landa is a man of principle and was shown to believe in the honor of a deal at the end of the movie. He is legitimately shocked when the americans kill his associate in the woods and claims that they had a deal
Posted by Harry Caray
Denial
Member since Aug 2009
20994 posts
Posted on 8/13/25 at 3:06 pm to
quote:

I always wondered if he recognized her in the restaurant later on.

I thought him ordering milk and telling her to wait for the cream was an indicator that he recognized her from the dairy farm
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
149794 posts
Posted on 8/13/25 at 3:16 pm to
quote:

Landa is a man of principle and was shown to believe in the honor of a deal
i think this is where I fall but again, wouldn't be surprised if he went the other way as well
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
128927 posts
Posted on 8/13/25 at 3:19 pm to
quote:

Nope. Landa is a man of principle


Hitler would disagree but I do think that's how Landa sees himself
Posted by Frac the world
The Centennial State
Member since Oct 2014
21148 posts
Posted on 8/13/25 at 3:30 pm to
quote:

I thought him ordering milk and telling her to wait for the cream was an indicator that he recognized her from the dairy farm


I always thought that was a test because the cream and strudel wasn’t kosher?
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
119977 posts
Posted on 8/13/25 at 3:33 pm to
quote:

I always thought that was a test because the cream and strudel wasn’t kosher?


That as well, which makes the scene that much more sick. Good observation there.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
128927 posts
Posted on 8/13/25 at 3:35 pm to
quote:

I always thought that was a test because the cream and strudel wasn’t kosher?



Both would often be made with animal lard, in particular pork lard, at that time, as I recall
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram