Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Suns Minority Owner Staging A Coup? | Page 2 | Pelicans
Started By
Message

re: Suns Minority Owner Staging A Coup?

Posted on 9/16/22 at 1:05 pm to
Posted by Parrish
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2014
2242 posts
Posted on 9/16/22 at 1:05 pm to
Forbes estimates $1.8B for Suns valuation.
Posted by brmark70816
Atlanta, GA
Member since Feb 2011
11317 posts
Posted on 9/16/22 at 1:21 pm to
quote:

Forbes estimates $1.8B for Suns valuation.


They are about to sign new TV and right deals, plus 2 expansion franchises.

If he can hold on for 2 more years, he could double his money. Should be easy if he is suspended for a year. If he's smart, he'd do a Mia culpa, take a 2 year ban, and pay triple the fine. Shrink back from the spotlight, then sell in 3 years. It wouldn't be smart to get out now.

Bad thing right now is that there are Suns players (Booker) that might supposedly demand trades..
Posted by saintsfan22
baton rouge
Member since May 2006
79636 posts
Posted on 9/16/22 at 2:58 pm to
quote:

f he can hold on for 2 more years, he could double his money. Should be easy if he is suspended for a year. If he's smart, he'd do a Mia culpa, take a 2 year ban, and pay triple the fine. Shrink back from the spotlight, then sell in 3 years. It wouldn't be smart to get out now.


He won't have a choice
quote:

Bad thing right now

Is the sponsors
quote:

s that there are Suns players (Booker) that might supposedly demand trades..

That's Knicks fanfic
Posted by TigerAlumni2010
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2011
4768 posts
Posted on 9/16/22 at 3:07 pm to
So it looks like Sarver owns 35% of the team, based on the $1.8 Billion valuation of the team, that should be around $650M. If they are serious, buy him out for $1.0B.
Posted by saintsfan22
baton rouge
Member since May 2006
79636 posts
Posted on 9/16/22 at 4:10 pm to
quote:

Forget all of the race stuff, if it was just the sexual misconduct stuff he should be canned/resign


Reading the stuff he's done he seems like a real life Michael Scott except it's real life so none of it is endearing to his employees like it is on a sitcom.
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
103415 posts
Posted on 9/16/22 at 4:37 pm to
We counting the time that he turned the GM’s office into some kind of livestock yard?
Posted by saintsfan22
baton rouge
Member since May 2006
79636 posts
Posted on 9/16/22 at 4:49 pm to
That, pulling down someone's pants in front of everybody during the ice bucket challenge just like Michael pulling down Toby's pants before the raccoon fun run, asking a woman if she got her boobs done, showing bikini pics of his wife to employees just like Michael with Jan.
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
103415 posts
Posted on 9/17/22 at 10:11 am to
Sarver being an idiot isn’t necessarily against the law.

And I think the league will be VERY hesitant to push this simply because the bar to pushing an owner out needs to be so high that it is about a once in a lifetime issue.

Sarver isn’t it. Sterling is an easier argument.


If the Sarver precedent stands, then the league could have forced out George Shinn in the late 90s / early 2000s, which would have meant no NOLA team, no OKC team after Katrina, no Bobcats, etc.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112692 posts
Posted on 9/17/22 at 10:17 am to
quote:

Sarver isn’t it. Sterling is an easier argument.

I think because race is such a hot button topic today that is all we're focusing on with Sarver.

If you look at the totality of the shite and the sexual inappropriateness, I think you can argue that Sarver's allegations are every bit as bad as Sterling's.
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
103415 posts
Posted on 9/17/22 at 10:25 am to
Sterling had a well documented history in court of his issues including losing a federal discrimination suit and being sued by numerous team employees over a long time period.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112692 posts
Posted on 9/17/22 at 10:46 am to
quote:

Sterling had a well documented history in court of his issues including losing a federal discrimination suit and being sued by numerous team employees over a long time period.
But that all had zero to do with the case that eventually ended with the selling of the team.

Feels like 99% of the Sarver discussion is around race and some of the sexual stuff is arguably much worse.
Posted by saintsfan22
baton rouge
Member since May 2006
79636 posts
Posted on 9/17/22 at 11:28 am to
quote:

Sarver being an idiot isn’t necessarily against the law.

Not against the law in that he'll be jailed but very much against the law in the way that he'd get a company sued a bunch and get fired in a normal job. Pulling an employee's pants down in front of everybody, a big no no. Telling a pregnant employee that she's not going to be able to do her job because she will have to breast feed, a big no no. Saying the n word a bunch, a big no no.

quote:

If the Sarver precedent stands, then the league could have forced out George Shinn in the late 90s / early 2000s, which would have meant no NOLA team, no OKC team after Katrina, no Bobcats, etc.

The reason Shinn left Charlotte was because their attendance cratered after his scandal with a cheerleader. The league would've definitely leaned on him to sell rather than move nowadays.
This post was edited on 9/17/22 at 11:30 am
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
103415 posts
Posted on 9/17/22 at 12:12 pm to
Shinn had a lawsuit of some kind which got ugly outside of the cheerleader incident IIRC.

Either way, he was a pariah in Charlotte and looked to move in order to keep the team. The league forcing a sale rather than allowing the move would have major effects on the whole league between players and other things involved.


Baron Davis, CP3, AD, and Zion clearly have altered careers at a least. All of those guys are or were superstars who were highly drafted, so their movements would have impacted competitiveness in the league for various teams.

OKC doesn’t end up with a team due to Katrina proving they could pull it off, which potentially impacts the careers of Durant, Westbrook, Harden, and others. It also means Seattle likely doesn’t lose the Sonics, though not guaranteed if the ownership situation were still in flux.

Charlotte keeping the Hornets means no reason to expand with the Bobcats, which means likely no opportunity for Michael Jordan to buy the team. If the Hornets ownership were stable after about 2000 or so and MJ didn’t have the money yet, he doesn’t have an opportunity to buy the team when Robert Johnson sells.
Posted by Stamps74
Member since Nov 2017
1450 posts
Posted on 9/18/22 at 7:18 am to
The league didn’t force the clippers owner to sell
Posted by BRich
Old Metairie
Member since Aug 2017
2890 posts
Posted on 9/20/22 at 8:31 pm to
quote:

such weird wording for an owner

Can you resign from owning a house


I agree with your general premise, but there are significant differences re: thsi analogy:

1. As per a couple of years ago, there are no longer "owners" in the NBA, after statements by black players saying "owners" were too akin to a slavery situation. League leadership caved; now calls them "governors".

2. You buy a house, you buy a business, and own it outright. You must be vetted and approved by other owners to purchase one of only 30 (thirty) FRANCHISES in the NBA. It is a limited and exclusive cabal or cartel.

3. The NBA, along with the other major leagues, have unionized talent, and have moved to more of a "partnership" model, often with pre-agreed sharing of profits. Players are far from being considered "employees" anymore.

4. Sarver does not own all of the team; he does not even own a majority of it (50%+). He is the largest shareholder, at about 35% and could be forced out by a coalition of the rest of the franchise's owners.
Posted by 50_Tiger
Arlington TX
Member since Jan 2016
43362 posts
Posted on 9/21/22 at 11:39 am to
Looks like it worked. Sarver is looking for buyers during his year hiatus.
Posted by Elleshoe
Wade’s World
Member since Jun 2004
143780 posts
Posted on 9/21/22 at 11:59 am to
quote:

owst him


Derp
Posted by Parrish
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2014
2242 posts
Posted on 9/21/22 at 12:02 pm to
His statement sounds so bitter. Suns fans are excited but I can see Sarver trying to torpedo the thing by selling to the least NBA acceptable new owner.

It may be difficult to find someone that wants to drop that much money and not be a majority owner. Seems like it'd suck to drop near $1B and not be able to call the shots.
Posted by cgrand
HAMMOND
Member since Oct 2009
47597 posts
Posted on 9/21/22 at 12:21 pm to
quote:

"As a man of faith, I believe in atonement and the path to forgiveness," Sarver said in a statement Wednesday. "I expected that the commissioner's one-year suspension would provide the time for me to focus, make amends and remove my personal controversy from the teams that I and so many fans love.

"But in our current unforgiving climate, it has become painfully clear that that is no longer possible -- that whatever good I have done, or could still do, is outweighed by things I have said in the past. For those reasons, I am beginning the process of seeking buyers for the Suns and Mercury."
Posted by whatiknowsofar
hm?
Member since Nov 2010
26839 posts
Posted on 9/21/22 at 12:42 pm to
quote:

by things I have said in the past.


And done. Like pantsing an employee in front of 60 of his peers
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram