- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 4/26/18 at 9:47 pm to sunnydaze
quote:
So trading 2 picks for 4-6 sacks is a win?
how many sacks would you think this would garner?
Posted on 4/26/18 at 9:48 pm to lsupride87
quote:If you did this same hypo with the Kamara pick last season, you'd come out saying you'd prefer the 49ers scenario.
Team a has 2018 14th pick
Team b has 2018 27th pick, and two first round picks in 2019 and an additional 5th round pick
I like team bs scenario better
All that matters is how good Davenport will be, all the good trade/bad trade stuff is just silly, nobody knows, we'll find out later.
Posted on 4/26/18 at 9:48 pm to sunnydaze
quote:The difference between an 8 sack player and 14 is huge.
So trading 2 picks for 4-6 sacks is a win?
Posted on 4/26/18 at 9:50 pm to shel311
quote:
All that matters is how good Davenport will be
*in 2018
quote:
If you did this same hypo with the Kamara pick last season,
more leeway b/c of the decreased value of the future picks and the increased value in the acquisition costs for the falling stud
Posted on 4/26/18 at 9:51 pm to SlowFlowPro
Right because his legs will fall off and the only year he will ever play is 2018.
Posted on 4/26/18 at 9:52 pm to infantry1026
Why do people keep saying we gahe up two firsts?
Posted on 4/26/18 at 9:52 pm to shel311
quote:I agree
If you did this same hypo with the Kamara pick last season, you'd come out saying you'd prefer the 49ers scenario.
I’m not even saying this actual trade won’t work in our favor
I am saying I think statistically, team b in my scenario has the better chance of ending up with a good player/players
You feel me?
Posted on 4/26/18 at 9:52 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
Right because his legs will fall off and the only year he will ever play is 2018.
we have a closing window with Brees
we leveraged our future because of this closing window
he has to immediately produce to justify the cost
Posted on 4/26/18 at 9:53 pm to LouBega
quote:
Why do people keep saying we gahe up two firsts?
because they are stupid.
Posted on 4/26/18 at 9:53 pm to SlowFlowPro
I think the window goes through 2019. I said 3 yrs left last year, this year I'm sticking to my guns, 2 years left.
Posted on 4/26/18 at 9:53 pm to Fun Bunch
We going to da ship baws
Posted on 4/26/18 at 9:54 pm to SlowFlowPro
No he doesn't. He has to turn out to be a good player and have a good career.
Posted on 4/26/18 at 9:54 pm to LouBega
quote:Technically we did, but the net is 1 pick, but we gave up 2.
Why do people keep saying we gahe up two firsts?
Posted on 4/26/18 at 9:57 pm to Pendulum
2 years is all we can expect. either get it done this year or next
Posted on 4/26/18 at 10:09 pm to sunnydaze
They gave up more than Tampa received for a top ten pick. Also means no Brees replacement in the 2019 draft.
This post was edited on 4/26/18 at 10:10 pm
Posted on 4/27/18 at 12:32 am to sunnydaze
quote:
So trading 2 picks for 4-6 sacks is a win?
If it's a "win now" move like some are saying then we need more than 4 sacks
Ya that’s a win. Situational pass rusher is needed. That is valuable to an already decent defense.
Posted on 4/27/18 at 12:47 am to Mr. Hangover
The only way this trade favors the Saints is if they make a deep playoff run and Davenport has at least an average season
Posted on 4/27/18 at 12:57 am to Vlatket
If we traded the 32 pick and a late 5th rounder for a perennial pro bowl pass rusher then it’s a great trade. If Brees gets hurt and we go 4-12 and give GB a top ten pick and Davenport is a bust then it’s a disaster.
No way to know until next year. It’s a lot to give up, but I think it shows we aren’t afraid to hit reset for a couple of years and restock on talent once this last mini window with Brees is over.
No way to know until next year. It’s a lot to give up, but I think it shows we aren’t afraid to hit reset for a couple of years and restock on talent once this last mini window with Brees is over.
Page 5 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News