- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: ICE shooting
Posted on 1/9/26 at 4:49 pm to LSU1SLU
Posted on 1/9/26 at 4:49 pm to LSU1SLU
Whether she "turned the wheel" or not. Whether he shouldn't have gotten in front of the vehicle and drawn his weapon or not. Whether she was a "leftist" and FAFO or not really isn't really the crux of this unfortunate incident.
Setting aside political considerations, there's really only one main point here: Compliance with commands from law enforcement officers. It is generally accepted that law enforcement officers—whether police, sheriffs, or federal agents—must have their commands followed promptly when approaching a vehicle. In high-pressure situations involving firearms, decisions are made within moments, and moving a vehicle in any direction toward officers can result in serious and potentially tragic consequences.
When instructed to stop by ICE or any armed law enforcement agency, compliance is critical to ensuring the safety of all parties involved. This remains an unfortunate situation for everyone affected.
Nevertheless, adherence to commands given at the scene may have prevented this outcome.
Setting aside political considerations, there's really only one main point here: Compliance with commands from law enforcement officers. It is generally accepted that law enforcement officers—whether police, sheriffs, or federal agents—must have their commands followed promptly when approaching a vehicle. In high-pressure situations involving firearms, decisions are made within moments, and moving a vehicle in any direction toward officers can result in serious and potentially tragic consequences.
When instructed to stop by ICE or any armed law enforcement agency, compliance is critical to ensuring the safety of all parties involved. This remains an unfortunate situation for everyone affected.
Nevertheless, adherence to commands given at the scene may have prevented this outcome.
1
Posted on 1/9/26 at 4:53 pm to LSU1SLU
You’re right he should have just done nothing and let her get away with hitting him with deadly weapon.
Posted on 1/9/26 at 4:55 pm to Nole Man
Correct, but the left doesn't recognize the authority, so this happens.
And train people like her to obstruct.
And train people like her to obstruct.
This post was edited on 1/9/26 at 4:58 pm
Posted on 1/9/26 at 4:57 pm to LSU1SLU
quote:
Did the gun change the trajectory of the bullet?
Posted on 1/9/26 at 4:58 pm to LSU1SLU
ICE doesn’t even have jurisdiction over US citizens. The fact that she got killed by one is extremely problematic.
Posted on 1/9/26 at 4:58 pm to LSU1SLU
quote:
Did the gun change the trajectory of the bullet?
Wait... what?
Posted on 1/9/26 at 5:01 pm to LSU1SLU
Honestly he was in his right to shoot the car moving at him but it wasn't the right choice. He was holding a cell phone and stepped in front the car and was pulling his gun already. He's she should have got out the car. But i also think she was scared.
He could have just as easily stepped aside let her go then using her licensec plate went and got her later.
But he chose to kill her. He put more people at risk as officers are trained not to shoot into cars. But this is not about the shooting. It's a right vs left issue now.
He could have just as easily stepped aside let her go then using her licensec plate went and got her later.
But he chose to kill her. He put more people at risk as officers are trained not to shoot into cars. But this is not about the shooting. It's a right vs left issue now.
Posted on 1/9/26 at 5:04 pm to c on z
quote:
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has powers to identify, arrest, detain, and remove individuals in the U.S. without legal status, enforce over 400 federal laws (like human trafficking), conduct investigations, and use force when necessary, with distinct divisions like Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) (apprehension/removal) and Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) (transnational crime) handling different aspects of its mission.
Their authority includes stopping people on reasonable suspicion, arresting suspected undocumented immigrants, and managing detention facilities.
Key Enforcement Powers
Identification & Arrest: Agents can initiate encounters, detain individuals with reasonable suspicion of unlawful presence, and arrest them.
Detention & Removal: Manage detention facilities and carry out deportations for those ordered removed.
Investigations: Conduct investigations into various criminal activities, including those related to immigration, human trafficking, and child exploitation, enforcing hundreds of laws.
Warrants: Can obtain warrants, though these differ from typical criminal warrants and require probable cause of removability.
Use of Force: Authorized to use force when they have reasonable grounds to believe it's necessary for an arrest or to protect themselves or others, according to DHS policy.
Workplace Enforcement: Can audit employers for Form I-9 compliance and impose fines.
you were saying?
Posted on 1/9/26 at 5:05 pm to c on z
quote:
ICE doesn’t even have jurisdiction over US citizen
quote:
does ice have jurisdiction over US citizens?
Yes—but only in limited ways. ICE does not have general immigration jurisdiction over U.S. citizens.
Here’s the clear breakdown:
What ICE does NOT have authority to do to U.S. citizens
? Detain, arrest, or deport someone for immigration violations if they are a U.S. citizen
? Treat a U.S. citizen as “removable” under immigration law
? Hold a citizen on a civil immigration warrant or detainer
If ICE knowingly holds a U.S. citizen solely for civil immigration purposes, that is unlawful.
What ICE can do involving U.S. citizens
ICE agents are still federal law enforcement officers, so they may:
? Investigate and arrest U.S. citizens for federal crimes (e.g., assault on a federal officer, harboring, fraud, obstruction)
? Question someone to determine identity or citizenship status (briefly and reasonably)
? Detain temporarily if they have reasonable suspicion the person is not a citizen—but they must release the person once citizenship is established
Posted on 1/9/26 at 5:10 pm to LSU1SLU
The mental infancy of the left is on full display these days. Good job
Posted on 1/9/26 at 5:16 pm to wadewilson
quote:
The body cam footage is out. Anyone with a brain can see that it was a justified shooting.
At least one person will read your post and change their mind and realize that it was definitely a justified shooting, because that's how message boards work.
Posted on 1/9/26 at 5:17 pm to Violent Hip Swivel
Was it not a justified shooting?
Posted on 1/9/26 at 5:24 pm to c on z
quote:
ICE doesn’t even have jurisdiction over US citizens. The fact that she got killed by one is extremely problematic.
Oh for fricks sake. Try driving at any sworn officer at any level, state or local, and youre Justifiably going to die.
Posted on 1/9/26 at 5:26 pm to LSU1SLU
Downvote 101 and my only regret is a hundred people beat me to it.
And that you have access to the internet.
And that you have access to the internet.
Posted on 1/9/26 at 5:27 pm to LSU1SLU
The justification for use of deadly force is if you feel the perpetrator represents a threat of serious bodily harm to yourself or others nearby.
While the vehicle was too close to the officer to keep him from getting hit, his justification was to protect others - such as the officer who was reaching into the vehicle, other officers in the scene, or bystanders who could be injured by an SUV accelerating rapidly on an icy street.
While the vehicle was too close to the officer to keep him from getting hit, his justification was to protect others - such as the officer who was reaching into the vehicle, other officers in the scene, or bystanders who could be injured by an SUV accelerating rapidly on an icy street.
Posted on 1/9/26 at 5:28 pm to Sun God
quote:
Was it not a justified shooting?
I'm leaning towards yes it was a justified shooting, but I can't say for sure. Hopefully more data and evidence will emerge.
In my opinion, if anyone has a strong opinion, they are just being guided by their biases and what they want to see and hope that happens.
Posted on 1/9/26 at 5:31 pm to Mingo Was His NameO
quote:
Yall being obsessed over an objectively sad situation is what’s wrong with America
within milliseconds of anything bad happening everyone runs to their corner where they can come up with an explanation about why its the other sides fault and the person deserved it. Every time, it's the knee jerk reaction. Its sickening. Everyone in this country fricking hates each other.
Posted on 1/9/26 at 5:37 pm to LSU1SLU
He didn't shoot to protect himself. His position was intentional. He had put his life on the line, knowing that he could be run over but that he might be able to stop her. That is what he is trained to do. He reacted when she escalated by weaponizing her vehicle. He shot her in order to prevent her from harming others. His survival is a priority but protecting innocent bystanders and other law enforcement personnel is the primary goal.
Posted on 1/9/26 at 5:40 pm to LSU1SLU
Correct if aim wrong, but weren’t you the leaking vagina earlier who asked, “how would you feel if it was your Mom who got murdered?1?1”
Is this your latest attempt to move the goal posts while defending your fellow comrade?
Is this your latest attempt to move the goal posts while defending your fellow comrade?
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News