Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Is Blocking A Site From Providing Escort Ads Unconstitutional? | Page 2 | O-T Lounge
Started By
Message

re: Is Blocking A Site From Providing Escort Ads Unconstitutional?

Posted on 1/16/17 at 2:14 pm to
Posted by timbo
Red Stick, La.
Member since Dec 2011
7900 posts
Posted on 1/16/17 at 2:14 pm to
I wish people knew what the First Amendment actually meant. A private business deciding not to run ads that promote illegal activity isn't a violation of the First Amendment. Just like the First Amendment doesn't keep Twitter from banning your arse if you post super obnoxious shite and it doesn't keep your boss from canning your arse if you post super obnoxious shite on Twitter.
Posted by theenemy
Member since Oct 2006
13078 posts
Posted on 1/16/17 at 2:25 pm to
You could make the argument by knowingly allowing prostitutes to place ads they were part of a conspiracy to commit an illegal act.

Just like if you knowingly provided a service for people to post ads for murder for hire...you could be arrested as part of that conspiracy.

This post was edited on 1/16/17 at 2:26 pm
Posted by colorchangintiger
Dan Carlin
Member since Nov 2005
30979 posts
Posted on 1/16/17 at 2:36 pm to
quote:

I wish people knew what the First Amendment actually meant. A private business deciding not to run ads that promote illegal activity isn't a violation of the First Amendment.


Backpage.com shuts down adult services ads after relentless pressure from authorities
Posted by jmarto1
Houma, LA/ Las Vegas, NV
Member since Mar 2008
38357 posts
Posted on 1/16/17 at 2:36 pm to
I honestly think it was less anout prostitution than it was human traffickiing. I'm probably legalized prostitution but shut that human trafficking shite down. I'd love for them to legalize and use the tax money to increase sex ed in schools and fight trafficking.
Posted by Brosef Stalin
Member since Dec 2011
41915 posts
Posted on 1/16/17 at 2:37 pm to
Nothing illegal about providing a donation to a woman for a date. What she chooses to do with you on that date is up to her.
Posted by theenemy
Member since Oct 2006
13078 posts
Posted on 1/16/17 at 2:42 pm to
quote:

Nothing illegal about providing a donation to a woman for a date. What she chooses to do with you on that date is up to her.


Go ahead and try to argue that in court.

You are going to be sadly disappointed.
Posted by Cole Beer
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2008
4842 posts
Posted on 1/16/17 at 2:42 pm to
You're donating "roses". Just make sure you know how many roses she likes or it won't go well for you.
Posted by Zanzibaw
BR
Member since Jun 2016
2954 posts
Posted on 1/16/17 at 2:43 pm to
quote:

If you want a hooker go to the dating section, they all moved there


Y'all mothafrickas need Jesus
Posted by theenemy
Member since Oct 2006
13078 posts
Posted on 1/16/17 at 2:44 pm to
Ya'll nasty.
Posted by Brosef Stalin
Member since Dec 2011
41915 posts
Posted on 1/16/17 at 2:46 pm to
Also completely legal to pay someone for adult modeling. Or just film it and call it a porno.
Posted by SidewalkDawg
Chair
Member since Nov 2012
10248 posts
Posted on 1/16/17 at 2:47 pm to
quote:

Also completely legal to pay someone for adult modeling. Or just film it and call it a porno.


I just say "I'd like to take you out to dinner and a movie. First you have to blow me though, and then you can go by yourself"
Posted by DAbully
Syria
Member since Dec 2016
1028 posts
Posted on 1/16/17 at 2:48 pm to
Trafficking in minors and foreigners for any labor is terrible and wrong. Having said that, a consenting adult not being able to offer sex acts for a price is beyond comprehension. Especially in a country where porn is legal.
Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 1/16/17 at 3:01 pm to
quote:

Trafficking in minors and foreigners for any labor is terrible and wrong. Having said that, a consenting adult not being able to offer sex acts for a price is beyond comprehension. Especially in a country where porn is legal.


This.
Posted by Tiger Prawn
Member since Dec 2016
25468 posts
Posted on 1/16/17 at 3:31 pm to
Because they're allowing ads for blatantly illegal services and basically had an entire section of the site dedicated to ads for an illegal service. I don't know how they got away with posting those ads for as long as they did. Government is probably threatening Backpage with being charged as an accessory to prostitution or human trafficking for hosting the ads.
Posted by DAbully
Syria
Member since Dec 2016
1028 posts
Posted on 1/16/17 at 3:42 pm to
quote:

Government is probably threatening Backpage with being charged as an accessory to prostitution or human trafficking for hosting the ads.




I don't know if all of what they say is true but supposedly this was an invaluable tool for law enforcement to catch child predators and traffickers all the while letting lonely men get their jollies off with the consenting adults. Seemed like a win win.

And for anyone thinking this could stop illegal activity has no sense of supply and demand. If there is a demand for it, there will always be someone supplying it. So shutting it down just sends it deeper underground and harder for authorities to catch up.

Does anyone honestly think pedophile Pete gives up looking for kiddie escorts bc big brother blocked his favorite site?
Posted by Armymann50
Playing with my
Member since Sep 2011
22231 posts
Posted on 1/16/17 at 3:44 pm to
Plank is not what it used to be.
Posted by Breesus
Unplug
Member since Jan 2010
69549 posts
Posted on 1/16/17 at 3:46 pm to
quote:

Is Blocking A Site From Providing Escort Ads Unconstitutional


I suppose you could try to are an argument if that website is run and operated by the US Government and it places an undue burden or discrimination on prostitution which you would also have to prove is a protected industry.

However a private site can pretty much do whatever it wants.
Posted by Mitcher8
Hopefully St. George soon
Member since Dec 2016
54 posts
Posted on 1/16/17 at 3:46 pm to
What is the difference between these adds and the ones in marijuana magenzines? They have advertisements for seeds that are illegal in most states. I can go to any book store in Louisiana and find 15 marijuana magazines with hundreds of "illegal" advertisements in each.
Posted by Tiger Prawn
Member since Dec 2016
25468 posts
Posted on 1/16/17 at 4:00 pm to
quote:

What is the difference between these adds and the ones in marijuana magenzines? They have advertisements for seeds that are illegal in most states. I can go to any book store in Louisiana and find 15 marijuana magazines with hundreds of "illegal" advertisements in each.


Never picked up a marijuana magazine, so not really sure what ads they have. But if someone posted an ad in the For Sale section of Craigslist for an ounce of weed, it wouldn't be up there long before CL removed it.
Posted by theenemy
Member since Oct 2006
13078 posts
Posted on 1/16/17 at 4:14 pm to
quote:

What is the difference between these adds and the ones in marijuana magenzines? They have advertisements for seeds that are illegal in most states. I can go to any book store in Louisiana and find 15 marijuana magazines with hundreds of "illegal" advertisements in each.


I believe with the magazine they can argue that the magazine is sold in places where marijuana is legal and that their ads are targeted to those geographics and only sales in those areas are permitted.

Whereas, Backpage is facilitating illegal activities in areas that it is expressly forbidden by law.
This post was edited on 1/16/17 at 4:14 pm
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram