Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Madison Brooks' Dad Lawsuit | Page 14 | O-T Lounge
Started By
Message

re: Madison Brooks' Dad Lawsuit

Posted on 9/19/23 at 10:26 pm to
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
87572 posts
Posted on 9/19/23 at 10:26 pm to
By saying he didn’t rape her.
Posted by danilo
Member since Nov 2008
25256 posts
Posted on 9/19/23 at 10:47 pm to
You baws donate to Madison Brooks Foundation? Looks like mom started it one month after her daughter was raped and died
LINK
Posted by Oneforthemoney
A town near you, la
Member since Dec 2013
2475 posts
Posted on 9/19/23 at 11:32 pm to
quote:

It's not about the money, it's about sending a message


Maybe the message should be, young adults shouldn't try to drink and break the law when they are not old enough to drink.

It's like blaming McDonald's for someone's obesity while they inhale a 200 piece chicken nuggets and 50 quarter pounders.
Posted by dallastigers
Member since Dec 2003
10116 posts
Posted on 9/20/23 at 12:25 am to
quote:

from what someone that knows the dad - he and mom were not on good terms and is kinda surprised mom didn't file suit first.


They have a year to file I think. When criminal trials are involved it’s not uncommon to file towards the end.

I had been thinking Scott was the father. I mentioned earlier that John may just not seek attention in press or social media, but until filing he has been mostly silent and maybe mostly in Florida while other family pushed for charges, answers questions, and hired an attorney to help address media, leaks, and other crap defense attorneys have put out about Madison and that night. Being surprised that the mother has not filed yet and filing first months before deadline against everyone possible including the kitchen sink also doesn’t really wash with not wanting attention in press. It comes across as spite towards mother and seeking money. Hopefully that’s not true, but it’s fair for anyone to think that based on his own actions or inactions.

It sucks he lost his daughter, but it also sucks he hadn’t been that involved with his daughter for awhile (based on ages of half-siblings and living in different states) and didn’t take the lead after her death.
This post was edited on 9/20/23 at 2:22 am
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
88782 posts
Posted on 9/20/23 at 6:18 am to
quote:

What percentage of you douche nozzles railing against lawsuits and lawyers would be the first to sue if you or your loved one was injured in an accident or worse, the victim of a crime caused by someone else's fault? 90%? Y'all virtue warriors are so self-righteously fake.


I don't think anyone has made the claim he should sue no one, but sweet melt anyway.
Posted by Ribbed
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2023
2745 posts
Posted on 9/20/23 at 6:26 am to
quote:

tgrbaitn08

I don't disagree with anything quatrepot said.
Posted by Knuckle Checker
Member since Jan 2019
632 posts
Posted on 9/20/23 at 6:29 am to
quote:

What percentage of you douche nozzles railing against lawsuits and lawyers would be the first to sue if you or your loved one was injured in an accident or worse, the victim of a crime caused by someone else's fault?


They just want to repeat a common popular meme to get upvotes

“This is why insurance rates are so high”

What insurance? Auto? Home?

This case doesn’t even have anything to do with auto insurance or home insurance.

Auto insurance is high because of the thousands of frivolous back and neck pain lawsuits. Not grieving fathers.

Home insurance is high because of building homes in flood areas of a costal state.

This case has zero to do with the average persons insurance rates.
Posted by TeddyPadillac
Member since Dec 2010
30084 posts
Posted on 9/20/23 at 7:16 am to
quote:

This case has zero to do with the average persons insurance rates.


So when Lyfts insurance just gives them $100k to settle and not go to court, even though they have zero fault but they don’t want to actually have to go to trial b/c that’ll cost too much, that will have nothing to do with auto insurance?

That’s how every auto insurance in this state works during stupid frivolous lawsuits. They just settle with the $25k or $50k instead of going to court, even though they know they would win in court, it still costs them money to go to court so they just settle.
Insurance companies get rich, lawyers get rich, shitty chiropractors get rich, shitty citizens get a small check, the rest of us pay out the arse for insurance. frick anyone and everyone involved with frivolous car accident lawsuits.
Posted by Alt26
Member since Mar 2010
34901 posts
Posted on 9/20/23 at 7:21 am to
quote:

You're what's wrong with society today


Thank you for the kind words.

I’m not saying the guys should or should not file a lawsuit. That’s his call. Just responding to the folks angry about the driver being sued to give an explanation as to WHY he has been named as a defendant.

If you are filing a lawsuit you are doing so with the intent to recover damages. And you have a higher chance of recovering damages from an insurance company (policy) than a guy making $30k a year. So in order to get the policy potentially on the hook the driver has to be named.
Posted by riverdiver
Summerville SC
Member since May 2022
2801 posts
Posted on 9/20/23 at 7:26 am to
quote:

I'm not advocating for anyone. Just telling you why the driver was sued...to get to the insurance policy. Not the actual driver. They won't try to collect anything directly from him.


Police cleared the driver.

Depends what the driver’s policy limits are. If he’s being sued for $10 million, his policy isn’t going to cover that.

And even if his policy is just sued successfully for whatever the limit is, the drivers insurance will go up drastically. Still going to cost the driver.
Posted by TeddyPadillac
Member since Dec 2010
30084 posts
Posted on 9/20/23 at 7:43 am to
quote:

And even if his policy is just sued successfully for whatever the limit is, the drivers insurance will go up drastically. Still going to cost the driver.



no it won't. That's not how that works.
my wife was in a 5 car pile up, the car in the middle, and was at no fault. our insurance paid the piece of shite first car who had but a scratch $50k. Our insurance did not go up.
Lawyers and insurance companies know how it works. Name eveyrone, insurance company just settles with what used to be $25k, but now $50k b/c that's the limit to not have a jury trial, or at least it was as i think they were trying to up it to $100k, and the insurance just settles for $50k instead of going to court even though they know they will win. They don't have the time to fight frivolous lawsuits and they cost money to fight, so they just settle.
So as i said, we all pay more money for insurance and they have a built in $50k settlement for whatever estimated drivers they'll have to pay out for in LA. They still get rich, lawyers get rich, chiropractors get rich, piece of shite citizen gets a check for like $8k out of the $50k, and we still live in a shitty state.
Posted by spslayto
Member since Feb 2004
21819 posts
Posted on 9/20/23 at 7:44 am to
quote:

I’m sure dad is looking to add to his lawsuit.


So you think this is dad and not the attorney?
Posted by Topwater Trout
Red Stick
Member since Oct 2010
69711 posts
Posted on 9/20/23 at 7:45 am to
quote:

What percentage of you douche nozzles railing against lawsuits and lawyers would be the first to sue if you or your loved one was injured in an accident or worse


I got hit by a drunk driver going 100 mph and hurt my back. I went to a lawyer to try to get my medical bills paid. he was all excited until he found out the DD had an insurance company that just went under. Then he started saying well we can sue the driver of the car i was in, her parents and your parents insurance. I said no way and ended up only getting my medical bills covered by the state.
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
84983 posts
Posted on 9/20/23 at 7:50 am to
quote:

I got hit by a drunk driver going 100 mph and hurt my back. I went to a lawyer to try to get my medical bills paid. he was all excited until he found out the DD had an insurance company that just went under. Then he started saying well we can sue the driver of the car i was in, her parents and your parents insurance. I said no way and ended up only getting my medical bills covered by the state.


The insurer of the car you were in, who may have been collecting premium to offer you coverage in this situation, surely appreciates your generosity.

quote:

only getting my medical bills covered by the state


You mean by John Q. Taxpayer. How is that better than the suing the for-profit company who collected premium to offer coverage?
Posted by Topwater Trout
Red Stick
Member since Oct 2010
69711 posts
Posted on 9/20/23 at 7:56 am to
quote:

You mean by John Q. Taxpayer. How is that better than the suing the for-profit company who collected premium to offer coverage?



The state stepped in and paid for this insurance companies claims. Point is I didn't gain anything I was just concerned with my medical bills. Sure if they had State Farnm I would have been compensated more than just medical bills. I assume you're a lawyer and would sue anyone without thinking that the settlements and awards aren't eventually passed on to the consumers...who are tax payers correct?
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
86856 posts
Posted on 9/20/23 at 8:54 am to
quote:

Thank you for the kind words.

If I came across as kind, I apologize. I did not mean to.
quote:

I’m not saying the guys should or should not file a lawsuit. That’s his call
I agree.

quote:

If you are filing a lawsuit you are doing so with the intent to recover damages. And you have a higher chance of recovering damages from an insurance company (policy) than a guy making $30k a year. So in order to get the policy potentially on the hook the driver has to be named.

This is what my comment was directed to. So, you basically extort the insurer for damages knowing their insured was not negligent. If you can't see how wrong this is, then you really should re-examine your life.
Posted by Demshoes
Up in here
Member since Aug 2015
10700 posts
Posted on 9/20/23 at 9:53 am to
hah
Posted by Dizz
Member since May 2008
16033 posts
Posted on 9/20/23 at 10:06 am to
quote:

Police cleared the driver.



He was cleared criminally which is not the same thing as being cleared from civil liability.
Posted by BilbeauTBaggins
probably stuck in traffic
Member since May 2021
7668 posts
Posted on 9/20/23 at 10:08 am to
This is pretty standard for civil suits. Sue everyone and see if something sticks. Less burden of proof.
Posted by Godfather1
What WAS St George, Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
88265 posts
Posted on 9/20/23 at 10:11 am to
quote:

the suspects who allegedly raped her


Good luck getting anything out of that motley crew.
Jump to page
Page First 12 13 14 15 16 ... 22
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 14 of 22Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram