- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Rittenhouse attorneys announced.
Posted on 8/28/20 at 4:50 pm to 50407Tiger
Posted on 8/28/20 at 4:50 pm to 50407Tiger
quote:
16 to 21 is a jump, smart guy.
What’s the significance of 21? It’s either 18 or 16 in Wisconsin...
Posted on 8/28/20 at 4:53 pm to efrad
quote:
I agreed that the laws are bad, yes.
The law allowed a kid who was attacked by convicted felons (one of which had a gun unlawfully) to defend himself. This is exactly what the second amendment is there for.
Posted on 8/28/20 at 4:55 pm to 50407Tiger
quote:
Yes, exactly why this country needs stricter gun laws.
We need common sense gun control laws in this country.
We can start by repealing the 1934 NFA.
This post was edited on 8/28/20 at 4:55 pm
Posted on 8/28/20 at 4:55 pm to upgrayedd
quote:Depends on if it appears that someone lit the advent candles a little too aggressively.
If you are in mass and Rittenhouse walked in looking exactly as he did that night, what would you reasonably assume?
Posted on 8/28/20 at 5:10 pm to Centinel
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/11/21 at 12:14 am
Posted on 8/28/20 at 5:12 pm to TBoy
quote:
While Rittenhouse may or may not have intended to kill people, he created a situation of intense danger by what he did.
And I’m certain I’ve seen combatants from the “other” side brandishing weapons in the streets as well. What were they carrying weapons for? Did they intend to hurt anyone or did they create a situation of “intense danger” by doing so?
Posted on 8/28/20 at 5:45 pm to ReauxlTide222
quote:
Why shouldn’t he have been there?
Cause he doesn’t live there? Can’t legally own an assault rifle that he killed people with?
The exact reasons a 17 shouldn’t own a gun...happened. Can’t legally make any important decisions in life
Posted on 8/28/20 at 5:45 pm to CharlesLSU
quote:
If you don’t think the kid was flexing, you’re naive.
If you don't think the "protestors" were there for confrontations you're naive. But according to Tboy, there would have been no confrontation had he not brought a rifle out there.
Posted on 8/28/20 at 5:48 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
Why shouldn’t he have been there?
Cause he doesn’t live there?
I bet a lot of the "protestors" don't live there either. So that's an irrelevant point.
quote:
Can’t legally make any important decisions in life
You're right to defend yourself from people assaulting you is not illegal.
I see y'all keep bringing up he was illegally possessing his firearm but haven't said a word about one of his attackers being a convicted felon in possession of a firearm, which is...you guessed it, illegal.
This post was edited on 8/28/20 at 5:56 pm
Posted on 8/28/20 at 5:50 pm to TBoy
You are so fricking stupid and full of shite
Posted on 8/28/20 at 6:00 pm to Lester Earl
quote:He’ll have to answer for his age and gun.
Cause he doesn’t live there? Can’t legally own an assault rifle that he killed people with?
The exact reasons a 17 shouldn’t own a gun...happened. Can’t legally make any important decisions in life
But he had just as much right to be there as anyone else. And he should have killed people who attacked him.
Why don’t you think he should have killed people who attacked him?
Posted on 8/28/20 at 6:00 pm to IAmNERD
quote:
bet a lot of the "protestors" don't live there either. So that's an irrelevant point.
None of them went there with the intent to kill people
You’d make a terrible frickin parent
Posted on 8/28/20 at 6:02 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
None of them went there with the intent to kill people
The Leftenent came with an illegally possessed firearm.
Those scumbags will kill if they think they can get away with it. That’s why they’ve killed 30 innocent people so far.
Posted on 8/28/20 at 6:03 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
None of them went there with the intent to kill people
almost nobody is buying what you are selling
Posted on 8/28/20 at 6:05 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
None of them went there with the intent to kill people
Yes they did. If you can make up bullshite reasons for Kyle being there, I can do the same for the rioters.
They obviously were there to try and kill anyone who didn't agree with them.
Posted on 8/28/20 at 6:06 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
None of them went there with the intent to kill people
Nah, there's no evidence over the past few months of these people out rioting in the streets have been assaulting and killing folks is there?
And way to jump right into attacking me personally when you have nothing to add.
This post was edited on 8/28/20 at 6:07 pm
Posted on 8/28/20 at 6:08 pm to Centinel
quote:
They obviously were there to try and kill anyone who didn't agree with them.
Yap, with the deadly skateboard lmao
Y’all are sick In the head
Posted on 8/28/20 at 6:08 pm to Lester Earl
quote:How did the kid come with any more intent to kill than the fricked arm guy?
None of them went there with the intent to kill people
Posted on 8/28/20 at 6:09 pm to Lester Earl
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/11/21 at 12:14 am
Posted on 8/28/20 at 6:09 pm to Ross
Is Lester a known troll?
It seems like all he does is troll.
It seems like all he does is troll.
Popular
Back to top


0










