Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Roe v Wade officially overturned | Page 20 | O-T Lounge
Started By
Message

re: Roe v Wade officially overturned

Posted on 6/24/22 at 11:57 am to
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
85737 posts
Posted on 6/24/22 at 11:57 am to
quote:

Do you want me to post multiple articles on medical professionals that disagree with you in general and on the medical issue specifically?



Yes.

And then list all the states they don't have some sort of carved out exceptions for health of the mother.

Thanks.
Posted by Abstract Queso Dip
Member since Mar 2021
5878 posts
Posted on 6/24/22 at 11:57 am to
From a legal aspect this involves more than abortion. What other items/areas does this impact in the legal system? Educate me I'm ignorant.
This post was edited on 6/24/22 at 11:58 am
Posted by Sao
East Texas Piney Woods
Member since Jun 2009
68469 posts
Posted on 6/24/22 at 11:58 am to

This is a very complicated slippery slope. Hope you guys clutching the good book know what you're doing.
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
72892 posts
Posted on 6/24/22 at 11:59 am to
quote:

People are going to be really outraged for a couple of weeks and then they'll move on to the "next thing" to be outraged about.


quote:

Um, no. Not this issue, Kemosabe.


I know leftists have fevered wet dreams about every women in the country rising up in righteous indignation over this. But that’s not going to happen. First of all, the dirty little secret leftists can’t say out loud is the majority of pro-life supporters are in fact women.

Fifty-one percent of women consider themselves pro-life, according to the poll, while 46 percent of men do. Meanwhile, 43 percent of women and 48 percent of men call themselves pro-choice.

And even those who are pro-choice, the abortion issue is far from the top of the list of issues they care about…

New poll: Only 15% of voters view abortion as most important midterm election issue, economy still top concern

Just 23% of voters viewed abortion as a more important election issue than the state of the economy, which 66% said was most important to their vote, according to the poll.


And this poll came out after the leaked draft broke. Yeah, there will be the expected rage from the usual leftist sources. But if anyone is waiting for some sort of mass grassroots groundswell of outrage, it ain’t happening.
This post was edited on 6/24/22 at 12:01 pm
Posted by Packer
IE, California
Member since May 2017
8699 posts
Posted on 6/24/22 at 11:59 am to
quote:

quote:
Nah I was just moreso responding to understanding rape victims being facked up mentally and a shitload of them never reporting it out of fear/embarrassment etc.


which is why I said they could always just go to another state if they didn't want to report the rape


Or give up their child for adoption. Plenty of foster parents would jump at the chance of getting a new born baby.
Posted by SoonerK
Member since Nov 2021
1014 posts
Posted on 6/24/22 at 12:00 pm to
quote:

Do you want me to post multiple articles on medical professionals that disagree with you in general and on the specific medical issue specifically?


Yes

On the specific medical issue specifically


https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-abortion-false/fact-check-termination-of-pregnancy-can-be-necessary-to-save-a-womans-life-experts-say-idUSL1N2TC0VD

Posted by WaWaWeeWa
Member since Oct 2015
15714 posts
Posted on 6/24/22 at 12:00 pm to
quote:

This is a very complicated slippery slope.


Less federal government control and more states rights is the anti slippery slope. Jesus some of y’all are unhinged
Posted by SoFla Tideroller
South Florida
Member since Apr 2010
40019 posts
Posted on 6/24/22 at 12:02 pm to
I'm sure there will be some Leftist funded NPOs that will transport women across state lines who are hell-bent on murdering their babies.
Posted by SoonerK
Member since Nov 2021
1014 posts
Posted on 6/24/22 at 12:02 pm to
quote:

Yes.

And then list all the states they don't have some sort of carved out exceptions for health of the mother.

Thanks.



That is my point. Why would states carve out an exception for something that would never need to happen?
Posted by Antonio Moss
The South
Member since Mar 2006
49356 posts
Posted on 6/24/22 at 12:02 pm to
quote:

You missed my point.


Your point has no substance.

That was my point that you clearly missed.
Posted by beebefootballfan
Member since Mar 2011
20676 posts
Posted on 6/24/22 at 12:02 pm to
quote:

Less federal government control and more states rights is the anti slippery slope. Jesus some of y’all are unhinged


Most of the voting populace are idiots who’ve never read the constitution and don’t know how this is supposed to work.
Posted by UpToPar
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
22935 posts
Posted on 6/24/22 at 12:03 pm to
quote:

but I would argue it’s a non viable pregnancy to begin with so not necessarily an abortion


This is going to be interesting and will be an issue the courts have to face soon.
This post was edited on 6/24/22 at 12:03 pm
Posted by SoonerK
Member since Nov 2021
1014 posts
Posted on 6/24/22 at 12:04 pm to
quote:

Your point has no substance.

That was my point that you clearly missed.


That Thomas brought up Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell and somehow failed to lump in Loving?
Posted by GAFF
Georgia
Member since Aug 2010
2737 posts
Posted on 6/24/22 at 12:04 pm to
I wonder how many of those outraged would be for a law stating that abortions are only available if the mother’s life is in danger or the pregnancy is a result of rape or incest. Basically, if you want an abortion simply because you fricked a dude and don’t want the baby it’s illegal. Way too many people hiding behind the veil of “how many mothers will die!?” when in reality they just don’t want the consequence of their actions.
Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
41902 posts
Posted on 6/24/22 at 12:04 pm to
quote:

Cool, hope you’re ready to raise funding for things like WIC.


Why can’t people that can’t afford to feed their babies have less kids?
Posted by WaWaWeeWa
Member since Oct 2015
15714 posts
Posted on 6/24/22 at 12:05 pm to
A Reuters fact check! Look out

quote:

In a “small percentage of abruptions,” Beck said, if a woman is bleeding so heavily that she can go into hemorrhagic shock, “then we would also recommend a very urgent termination of pregnancy or abortion as a life saving measure for the mom, in order to prevent her bleeding to death.”


They are conflating early delivery with abortion

Abortion is intentionally terminating the life of the baby. That is the goal.

Early delivery is ending the pregnancy early and then doing everything you can to save the baby

I want to know, and be specific, why the baby can’t be delivered and saved? How does the act of killing the baby save the mother?

Posted by Klark Kent
Houston via BR
Member since Jan 2008
74243 posts
Posted on 6/24/22 at 12:05 pm to
truth
Posted by Impotent Waffle
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2007
10116 posts
Posted on 6/24/22 at 12:06 pm to
quote:

Is that not what happened Jan 6?


I hate both parties equally.

With that being said,

A group of individuals stormed our nation's capitol took down our flag and raised a Trump flag while claiming to be doing it for America..

As someone who served my country, once you take my nation's flag and replace it with yours. I am done with you
This post was edited on 6/24/22 at 12:14 pm
Posted by Klark Kent
Houston via BR
Member since Jan 2008
74243 posts
Posted on 6/24/22 at 12:06 pm to
is this where i play the “acktually, it’s both sides” card?
Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
41902 posts
Posted on 6/24/22 at 12:07 pm to
quote:

People act like pregnancy is a virus you somehow catch."


In well over 99.99% of cases pregnancy is 100% preventable
Jump to page
Page First 18 19 20 21 22 ... 64
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 20 of 64Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram