- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 12/4/18 at 10:49 am to goofball
quote:
910 LB-FT of Torque
Wow!
That is boxy as hell.
Posted on 12/4/18 at 10:54 am to PillageUrVillage
quote:
That is boxy as hell.
When they cam out with this people bitched OMG too many curves!!!
Posted on 12/4/18 at 10:55 am to Bolivar Shagnasty
GM had a 1500HD for a couple of years. Didn't sell well at all. The people who wanted 1500s, didn't want to pay for the HD stuff, suffer HD ride, and have HD fuel mileage. They also had a non-HD 2500 around that time. No idea why, because those didn't sell well either
Posted on 12/4/18 at 11:11 am to goofball
I mean, how much bigger can they keep making trucks?
I think we've reached (or exceeded) the ideal balance between interior and cargo space and functionality. I certainly don't think I would ever need more room inside than my f150 has.
I think we've reached (or exceeded) the ideal balance between interior and cargo space and functionality. I certainly don't think I would ever need more room inside than my f150 has.
Posted on 12/4/18 at 12:17 pm to PillageUrVillage
I change what I said from the side view, full on from the front, that is an ugly front end.
Posted on 12/4/18 at 4:14 pm to goofball
Beautiful truck, but I can only imagine that beast is going to cost a pretty penny!
Posted on 12/4/18 at 4:31 pm to White Bear
quote:
Chevy loves some tight wheel wells.
Being a honkey and all, I didn’t even notice
Posted on 12/4/18 at 7:57 pm to auggie
quote:
6.6 liter would be a 400 ci. ?
That was a small block engine.
Maybe they will offer a big block later though.
Displacement doesn't determine big block vs. small block.
Posted on 12/4/18 at 8:04 pm to goofball
I like it
Posted on 12/4/18 at 8:41 pm to PillageUrVillage
Boxy doesn’t bother me. My favorite trucks of all time are the 70’s and 80’s chevys. Those trucks were also the squarest ever made.
But still, these new trucks are ugly.
But still, these new trucks are ugly.
Posted on 12/4/18 at 8:43 pm to NewIberiaHaircut
If I recall correctly, they had a 366ci Big Block for medium duty trucks 20 years ago. That’s around a 6.0L V8 in displacement.
The Vortec 6.0L V8 in the current HD trucks is an entirely different engine with a small block.
The new 6.6L gas engine is primarily for their medium duty trucks. It’s alreafy being tested by GM and Navistar in class 4, 5, and 6 trucks.
It’s likely a big block with iron construction, high capacity cooling, and direct injection.
The Vortec 6.0L V8 in the current HD trucks is an entirely different engine with a small block.
The new 6.6L gas engine is primarily for their medium duty trucks. It’s alreafy being tested by GM and Navistar in class 4, 5, and 6 trucks.
It’s likely a big block with iron construction, high capacity cooling, and direct injection.
Posted on 12/4/18 at 9:15 pm to Four Leaf Tayback
shite holmes, a man cant run a 285 w/o body rub.
Posted on 12/4/18 at 10:09 pm to goofball
It's amazing how ugly the Silverado is compared to the F150
Posted on 12/4/18 at 10:29 pm to PillageUrVillage
If they dropped the silver Chevrolet bar down to the center of the grill and moved the middle headlight above that bar I feel like it would look much better. here's my quick and dirtyphotoshop job, although not sure if I like it now that I have seen it. maybe stick with body color on the vertical chrome piece?
This post was edited on 12/4/18 at 11:05 pm
Posted on 12/5/18 at 5:59 am to Hermit Crab
I like your version much better 
Posted on 12/5/18 at 9:34 am to PillageUrVillage
If this is the front end design Chevrolet is going with just think what the other prototype designs looked like... woof.
Looks like Im looking down into a bread toaster.
Sardine can with braces
I dunno even know what this looks like but it aint good.
Looks like Im looking down into a bread toaster.
Sardine can with braces
I dunno even know what this looks like but it aint good.
Posted on 12/5/18 at 9:58 am to GEAUXT
quote:
I think we've reached (or exceeded) the ideal balance between interior and cargo space and functionality. I certainly don't think I would ever need more room inside than my f150 h
I don’t know how many posts I’ve read on this board praised the F150 because it’s back seat had more room than chevys did. Now that Chevy has more it’s a negative thing?
Posted on 12/5/18 at 10:10 am to upgrade
quote:the 150 figs are figs. They can see no wrong in 150s no matter what. Same with Tundra figs. I have always been partial to Sierra's and have had 3 ('95, '03', '07). I now Drive a raptor('14), while i do love it i do miss how the GM's drive. And when my rapter kicks the bucket, I want to see what the new raptors would be like then and if i dont like them, i will go back to GM.
I don’t know how many posts I’ve read on this board praised the F150 because it’s back seat had more room than chevys did. Now that Chevy has more it’s a negative thing?
I also have always had the idea to buy a old 90's GM and get a crate diesel installed and a new interior. I wonder how much you could save, if any, doing that, basically putting new everything on there.
Posted on 12/5/18 at 10:18 am to Mr.Perfect
F150s just look cheap to me. They scream fleet truck.
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News