- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Fishing/boating on someone else’s property to remain illegal
Posted on 5/1/19 at 6:36 pm to lotik
Posted on 5/1/19 at 6:36 pm to lotik
quote:your question was how high could they prohibit people from flying above their property.
you kindly point me to the law that states you own 500 ft about your property?
I simply provided an altitude that is listed by the FAA as public airspace.
0
Posted on 5/1/19 at 7:11 pm to Wacker
You have more public area to fish in LA than Sabine and mobile deltas combined and Xs 3.
Posted on 5/1/19 at 7:39 pm to Clyde Tipton
joinLaSc.com
Posted on 5/1/19 at 8:43 pm to Capt ST
Not the point.... the point is Sabine and Mobile Deltas are very very similar to the Louisiana marsh and they have no restrictions.... We do have a good bit of public area to fish.... the problem is that we have lost some areas as well... the way the law is written we could lose a good bit more.... all major tournament trails will not come back here.... Also, as I have traveled the southeast fishing tournaments I have learned from my competitors from other states that they will never vacation here because of the laws.... I know that may make some of you happy, but I think it’s wrong and will fight to change it
Posted on 5/1/19 at 10:23 pm to Wacker
When you say "change" it, you realize you are asking the government to "take" someone's property and give it to you, right?
What about all the taxes and expenses paid by the private landowner over the years? Does none of that count?
What about all the taxes and expenses paid by the private landowner over the years? Does none of that count?
Posted on 5/1/19 at 10:58 pm to Contender54
Not asking to be given someone’s property... Just want to fish ..... just like all the other states..... Like I said in previous posts.... What goes on in Louisiana is way different than any other state..... Nobody is asking to hunt the land, mineral rights, etc.... just the opportunity to fish the water....
Posted on 5/1/19 at 11:38 pm to Wacker
quote:
just the opportunity to fish the water....
Just like in all 49 other states.
Posted on 5/2/19 at 2:57 am to Mr Wonderful
Courtesy of Media Bass.
All areas in Red are off limits to the public.
All areas in Green are still open to the public.
All areas in Red are off limits to the public.
All areas in Green are still open to the public.
Posted on 5/2/19 at 6:46 am to Mr Wonderful
I, for someone who is neither a marsh fisherman or marshowner, enjoy reading these threads with great amusement.
On one hand you have baws that think it should be public because they really like to fish da marsh and also other states have public waters rules so we should be able to fish anywhere a boat can be driven and also they really like to fish da marsh.
On the other hand you have alxtger dropping logic and actual law like firey balls of napalm amongst the circle jerk.
On one hand you have baws that think it should be public because they really like to fish da marsh and also other states have public waters rules so we should be able to fish anywhere a boat can be driven and also they really like to fish da marsh.
On the other hand you have alxtger dropping logic and actual law like firey balls of napalm amongst the circle jerk.
Posted on 5/2/19 at 7:09 am to AlxTgr
Alex, any updates on the Catahoula Lake situation?
Posted on 5/2/19 at 7:26 am to Chuker
You do realize this doesn’t only apply to “da marsh”?
Posted on 5/2/19 at 7:29 am to Clyde Tipton
quote:
Where exactly is the state rebuilding marsh on private land at the expense of tax payers?
Between Elmers Island and Fourchon. Considered private marsh but the state filled in all the holes from the marsh to the gulf to combat the erosion. I will say this though I know it's considered private but I see a lot of people fishing it every time I drive by and have not seen anybody getting ran off.
Posted on 5/2/19 at 7:37 am to MrLSU
Media Bass is wrong then.
All that green around the bayou decade area should be red unless its in the bayou.
All that green around the bayou decade area should be red unless its in the bayou.
Posted on 5/2/19 at 8:25 am to dwr353
quote:Writ app sitting at Supreme Court. Their site is not as user friendly, to me, as the Third Circuit, so I probably will not know the result as fast as before. We will all probably see a press release at some point. But, if granted, it will probably be for briefing and argument, so then there would be another delay.
Alex, any updates on the Catahoula Lake situation?
Posted on 5/2/19 at 9:06 am to Wacker
quote:
I know that may make some of you happy, but I think it’s wrong and will fight to change it
You should probably prepare yourself to lose, bud. The people who own these places very likely have too much stroke to ever let a law pass that changes it.
I also find the concept of “taking without reimbursement” distasteful. They had to buy this marsh at some point to be able to claim ownership of it. It has no surface value beyond fishing, so claiming “all I want is to fish it” defeats the purpose of owning it.
It honestly sounds like this should and will be treated like woods and hunting have been: you want a place to fish? Buy one. Otherwise fish the few public places and be thankful you have them. No ones owes you a place to fish.
This post was edited on 5/2/19 at 9:08 am
Posted on 5/2/19 at 9:11 am to Decisions
quote:
Decisions
Posted on 5/2/19 at 9:31 am to Decisions
quote:
It honestly sounds like this should and will be treated like woods
Any attempt to analogize water access with air, roads, forest, etc. is misguided and a strawman argument at best. Water is water and must be regulated uniquely as it presents unique circumstances that don't exist by land or by air.
Posted on 5/2/19 at 9:35 am to SpeckledTiger
quote:It's neither misguided nor a straw man. The best example of a straw man here is the rebuild with state money argument.
Any attempt to analogize water access with air, roads, forest, etc. is misguided and a strawman argument at best
quote:This isn't a water issue. That's where so many get off track. It is a land issue.
Water is water and must be regulated uniquely as it presents unique circumstances that don't exist by land or by air.
Posted on 5/2/19 at 9:44 am to SpeckledTiger
quote:
water access
You use this phrase but you don’t mean it. No one here wants these canals opened so that they can reach their own lakes or property.
That’s access. Needing to use a place as a transit to elsewhere.
Y’all just want to fish it, to use the place itself for its fish habitat value (which is JUST like woods and their hunting, FYI). For free. No thanks.
This post was edited on 5/2/19 at 9:51 am
Posted on 5/2/19 at 9:46 am to AlxTgr
quote:
The best example of a straw man here is the rebuild with state money argument.
I honestly have a hard time with this issue because I'm a strong supporter of property rights but I also don't think state money should be going to the restoration of private land. Do you think the state should be spending money on that?
Page 4 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News