- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 25 years after OJ killed Nicole
Posted on 6/18/19 at 10:58 pm to OMLandshark
Posted on 6/18/19 at 10:58 pm to OMLandshark
I know. But you are correct. The trial location was also a factor.
Yes, the DA fricked some things, but Rodney King made it to where OJ would NEVER be found guilty.
Yes, the DA fricked some things, but Rodney King made it to where OJ would NEVER be found guilty.
0
Posted on 6/18/19 at 10:59 pm to DyeHardDylan
OJ was one lucky son of a bitch. Perfect locale for him to be tried along with a team of bumbling fools on the prosecution.
Posted on 6/18/19 at 11:01 pm to Loserman
True, but the transcripts from Fuhrman should have never been played to the public or released because they had nothing to do with the case. Only a part demonstrating his perjury was pertinent. And it should have been a mistrial anyway because Ito’s wife was mentioned in the transcripts.
Posted on 6/18/19 at 11:01 pm to Hickok
quote:
OJ's son did it,
I worked for one of OJ’s golfing buddies mentioned in his suicide letter. I mentioned this theory to him, and trust me, Jason didn’t kill Ron and Nicole. It was OJ. He lit up my ear on fricked up OJ stories. He told him that he wanted to kill her. He bragged to him that he beat his wife (which he said he underplayed it by “smacking her around”) after a homosexual kissed his kid. But every time something happened, he blamed it on Nicole. There are some stories he told me I haven’t seen reported. He said that the month before the murders OJ was weird and psychotic as frick. He fricking killed her.
Posted on 6/18/19 at 11:06 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
and trust me, Jason didn’t kill Ron and Nicole.
Meh, I'm putting it on the son, if I'm wrong OJ should feel worse about his decisions and letting it hang out there like that and not confessing.
Posted on 6/18/19 at 11:10 pm to Hickok
quote:
Meh, I'm putting it on the son, if I'm wrong OJ should feel worse about his decisions and letting it hang out there like that and not confessing.
Have you ever met a sociopath? Yes, this is a reasonable expectation from an average human, but sociopaths don’t feel bad about their actions and think they’re all justified.
This post was edited on 6/19/19 at 4:19 pm
Posted on 6/18/19 at 11:11 pm to DyeHardDylan
The most obvious faked evidence was the bloody sock found inside OJ's home.
The applied blood had soaked through one side and left an impossible to achieve spot of blood on the opposite side of the sock.
Impossible spot if a leg was actually in the sock. It was covered heavily in the trial.
The applied blood had soaked through one side and left an impossible to achieve spot of blood on the opposite side of the sock.
Impossible spot if a leg was actually in the sock. It was covered heavily in the trial.
Posted on 6/18/19 at 11:16 pm to DyeHardDylan
The prosecuting team was arse, and that racist Rodney King.
Posted on 6/18/19 at 11:16 pm to DyeHardDylan
quote:The gloves. They didnt fit so they jury had to acquit
What do you think was most responsible for the verdict?
Posted on 6/18/19 at 11:16 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
Have you ever met a sociopath? Yes, this is a reasonable expectation from an average human, but sociopaths don’t feel bad about their actions and think they’re all justified
I've met a few, but are you arguing OJ was a sociopath and his son was normal? That Jason didn't have a history of assaulting people?
Posted on 6/18/19 at 11:18 pm to DyeHardDylan
The Rodney King incident
The incompetent police department
The arrogant prosecution
It was the perfect storm
The incompetent police department
The arrogant prosecution
It was the perfect storm
Posted on 6/18/19 at 11:18 pm to Hickok
quote:
I've met a few, but are you arguing OJ was a sociopath and his son was normal? That Jason didn't have a history of assaulting people?
I’m arguing that OJ had an extensive history of brutally assaulting and raping Nicole among other women. OJ’s blood was at the scene, and no Jason wasn’t there. Nicole’s head was basically cut off. Jason didn’t do that, it was OJ.
Posted on 6/18/19 at 11:23 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
I’m arguing that OJ had an extensive history of brutally assaulting and raping Nicole among other women. OJ’s blood was at the scene, and no Jason wasn’t there. Nicole’s head was basically cut off. Jason didn’t do that, it was OJ
Jesus man, you should've taken the stand if you knew that. Honestly I'm just pushing buttons, it's fun to think that a knife crazed, previous abusive, son of OJ could've done it. But since you know golf buddies and all, I'd suggest you testify next time you have definitive evidence of a murder.
Posted on 6/18/19 at 11:23 pm to OMLandshark
I mean, OJ’s subsequent behavior and the car chase wasn’t exactly indicative of someone who was innocent.
Posted on 6/18/19 at 11:31 pm to DyeHardDylan
Could have been the juror who gave OJ the black power fist.
Posted on 6/18/19 at 11:39 pm to DyeHardDylan
Bronx juries.
Posted on 6/18/19 at 11:44 pm to Hickok
quote:
OJ had no defensive wounds
OJ had a deep cut on his finger.
Posted on 6/19/19 at 1:06 am to DyeHardDylan
quote:
What do you think was most responsible for the verdict? Po
Barry Scheck for the defense, he picked apart the so-called mountain of evidence that Marsha Clarke promised and never materialized.
And Scheck's not scum...he founded and runs the innocence project which has freed wrongfully convicted people based on DNA evidence...for years.
Prosecutions case was...husband, glove behind his house and pin prick glove marks on his socks on his floor after he had given blood samples to the police...and after VanAdder had those vials personally for over 24 hours.
I think Marcia Clarke lost it and Barry Scheck won it.
She promised a mountain of evidence that never happened...people expected, jurors expected a guy who just butchered two people and the blood at Bundy was like a horror film would have mountains of blood in his Bronco.
And yet all was presented was just pin-prick book stains one or two...just like his socks. People asked, did OJ wear a Hazmat suit?
If Marcia Clarke hadn't oversold it and tried to tell a story why a guy who just butchered two people has almost no blood on him and drives home...it might have sold.
But they never presented what they promised, just a glove behind a house which is totally suspect, two pin-pricks on the gate, two or three drops in his car and two drops on socks he apparently was dumb enough to leave on the floor just right in front of his bed but apparently carried away blood soaked clothes to Chicago.
Barry Scheck showed to the jury that all the blood evidence the State had could easily come from one vial of OJ's blood of which they took right away...and then made the case against him.
That's what won the case. Prosecution relied on dog barkings and domestic abuse, etc. They should have explained to the jurors or tried to explain how someone could decapitate two people and leave so little blood. They never did that...they thought any blood in the Bronco would convict.
Posted on 6/19/19 at 4:27 am to DyeHardDylan
Why not both?
Posted on 6/19/19 at 6:34 am to OMLandshark
Didn't one of the black females jurors on the OJ documentary admit that if he killed his first wife (who was black) instead of Nicole that he'd be doing life in prison?
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News