Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us 40 hours a week ? No way! | Page 5 | Political Talk
Started By
Message

re: 40 hours a week ? No way!

Posted on 8/5/25 at 7:25 am to
Posted by lake chuck fan
Vinton
Member since Aug 2011
22178 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 7:25 am to
I have always wanted all the overtime I can get. That's the extra money I use to do the things I enjoy. 40 hrs just pays the bills.
Posted by Jorts R Us
Member since Aug 2013
17254 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 7:42 am to
quote:

Interesting name for your welfare/unemployment checks


Do you not invest? Or is there some personal history you have with that poster that prompted such a goofy post?
This post was edited on 8/5/25 at 7:50 am
Posted by Load Toad
Haughton, LA
Member since Aug 2008
2500 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 7:48 am to
I have be completely honest. I am against working 40 hrs per week during deer season. I still have to do it anyways.
Posted by Red_and_black
Atlanta
Member since Jun 2014
744 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 7:52 am to
quote:

How is this political?


The fact that you ask this idiotic question explains your insane posting history. Labor and economic issues are obviously very political. If enough idiots adopt the 'reasoning' of this lazy of this moron that will absolutely affect taxation and income distribution even moreso that it already is- Nothing political about that right ?

Wow how willfully dumb can someone be.
Posted by oklahogjr
Gold Membership
Member since Jan 2010
40237 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 8:21 am to
quote:

pussy

40 is not shite. many of us here have worked 50, 60 and 70 hour weeks most our lives. many times 84 and 98 hour work weeks.

you must be on disability and have no clue what real hard work is


Don't you have hurricane victims to price gouge somewhere?

Anyways. My goal in life isn't to work it away. I make plenty of money and am lucky enough to have a job I'm not strapped to my computer with. The only reason I work is to afford me the lifestyle I want. I will continue to negotiate for less work and more money as much as I can.
Posted by lowhound
Effie
Member since Aug 2014
9918 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 8:39 am to
Bitch, talk to me after you've worked a couple months of 7/12's
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
60119 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 8:39 am to
quote:

You think people work long hours because they want to work long hours? They have the choice between long or short hours for the same amount of money and they choose long hours?



Have you read this thread? People are patting themselves and each other on the back for working insane hours as if their human worth is increased from working more than 8 hours a day.

quote:

And who in those businesses is actually moving things forward?



It's usually the boots on the ground who are actually doing the work as opposed to the c-suite types.


quote:

I just keep a piss bucket under my desk and have the cleaning staff empty it.
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
60119 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 8:41 am to
quote:

The fact that you ask this idiotic question explains your insane posting history. Labor and economic issues are obviously very political. If enough idiots adopt the 'reasoning' of this lazy of this moron that will absolutely affect taxation and income distribution even moreso that it already is- Nothing political about that right ?

Wow how willfully dumb can someone be.


no one is discussing policy in this thread. people are bragging about working free overtime and mocking someone who doesn't want to work.

your sanctimony tracks beautifully with the rest of this thread.
Posted by oklahogjr
Gold Membership
Member since Jan 2010
40237 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 8:44 am to
quote:

Have you read this thread? People are patting themselves and each other on the back for working insane hours as if their human worth is increased from working more than 8 hours a day.



It's insane. I was very career focused when I was younger and it's paid dividend nows. The entire point though was to work hard then so I didn't have to later. My days success now is based on how many times I can sneak out a my home office and play games with my kid for a bit while still getting my work done.

Two parents working 40 hours a week would be very difficult to get in all the great family time and fun
This post was edited on 8/5/25 at 8:46 am
Posted by Crimson Wraith
Member since Jan 2014
29618 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 8:46 am to
Most people don't work 40 hrs when you deduct lunch, breaks, screwing off, ...
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
60119 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 8:56 am to
It's just this obsession with comparing oneself with strangers that baffles me. Who cares what some random person in some random state does or doesn't want to do? Why does that matter to us?

quote:

Two parents working 40 hours a week would be very difficult to get in all the great family time and fun



100%

My husband and I are lucky that we have jobs that are flexible. I can step out for hours to attend conferences, school performances, etc or bring my kids to work with me a lot of the time if I need to. My husband can work from home or have the kids tag along with him on the road if he needs to.

I don't care about impressing people on the poli board with the number of hours I work or anything else.
This post was edited on 8/5/25 at 8:57 am
Posted by Jrv2damac
KS (mountain time)
Member since Mar 2004
72653 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 9:22 am to
Nobody cares, you stupid bitch.
Posted by DocYatesVA
Yukon, OK
Member since Oct 2022
303 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 9:29 am to
Her forty hour work week basically equates to four day work week, with that math. yet, during a three week period she can't find time to wash her filthy body? She has got issues way beyond the fact that she is a lazy beast. I got news for her, unless the gravy train that she is waiting on arrives, she ain't gonna see any relief. Welcome to adulthood princess!
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
11741 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 9:34 am to
quote:

I didn’t watch it but I’m sure you understand that people monetize their social media accounts by gaining followers and garnering engagement.


The problem with that analysis is that what she posted dovetails with actual widely observed trends in society. The attitudes regarding work in 2025 are very different than they were even 20 or 30 years ago and that trend has been widely documented by plenty of mainstream sources.

That's what you always ignore when you knee jerk respond that something isn't true just because a social media influencer posted it. Posting it on social media doesn't make it true or accurately reflect a trend—that's accurate, of course. But you tend to take that premise and over apply it such that you deny anything is true or reflective of a trend in thought that anyone posts on social media. It's the same thing posters do here when some news outlet they don't like prints something they don't find to be convenient. They just dismiss the information because of the source.

quote:

If this person can post this and she has men she doesn’t know all over the country driving traffic to her social media… who is the moron?


As if only one of those two are allowed to be a moron? Two things can be true at the same time. Acting like it has to be one or the other is a false dilemma.

You're also implying that this woman is necessarily trolling, which is to say that she doesn't really mean what she's saying, she's only putting it out there as clickbait. The rest of the context in this case makes that very unlikely.

This post was edited on 8/5/25 at 9:35 am
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
11741 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 9:36 am to
quote:

I don't care about impressing people on the poli board with the number of hours I work or anything else.


Balderdash.

You give the distinct impression of caring very much about presenting yourself as someone who is "above it all," just like you did right here.

It's part of just about everything you post.
Posted by Champagne
Sabine Free State.
Member since Oct 2007
54219 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 9:46 am to
There are so many ways to manipulate the system to get enough govt free money - working a full time job makes no sense for them.
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
11741 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 9:53 am to
quote:

I’m a work to live person, not a live to work person.


Well, you're a woman.

And before someone spurges out over that comment, there is plenty of academic information detailing distinct differences between the trends of attitudes of men and women about being in the workforce.

And one of the things that the studies show is that men are more likely to pursue higher levels of achievement even when those higher levels require more investment of time and effort than women are. Women are more likely to say, "Nah, I'm good where I am," rather than seeking to climb higher on whatever ladder they have available to them to avoid the commitment of more time/energy.

Which is basically what you just said...you don't understand all the men on the thread bragging about working longer hours and instead bragging that your goal is to work as little as possible. All you did is articulate on an individual level what the academics tell us on a corporate level.

This is why there's a "gender pay gap."

It's also why the more women attempt to act like men, the more depressed and mentally dysfunctional they become (we're up to what? 2/3s of the female population having been diagnosed with some mental disorder at this point).

Another highly researched conclusion is that men care more about things than women do and women care more about people than men do. Which is why even in the most egalitarian countries on planet Earth, when left entirely to their own devices, women choose helping professions (nursing, teaching, etc.) at even higher rates than they do in America.

Here the feminist agenda artificially pushes women into roles they aren't as well suited for mentally/emotionally just to prove that "women can do anything men can."

Maybe they can, but that doesn't mean it's good for them.

Anyway, the reason the woman in the video gets so much derision isn't just because she doesn't want to work outside the home. It's that she doesn't want to work outside the home but gives no context that she's willing to work inside the home instead.

I don't think people here would object to a trad-wife situation. But you got to do contribute to society in some way. Either put on some man-pants and do your 40 hours a week acting like a man and hate it, or be a wife and a mother and take care of the household.

But do something productive.
Posted by pitchandcatch27
Huntsville,AL
Member since Jul 2018
4239 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 9:55 am to
She needs to work to fix that gap in her teeth. I can work 40 a week standing on my head... one word for her is. LAZY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
This post was edited on 8/5/25 at 9:55 am
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
60119 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 9:57 am to
quote:

You give the distinct impression of caring very much about presenting yourself as someone who is "above it all," just like you did right here.



Really? Perception is reality so I'll take your word for it.
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
60119 posts
Posted on 8/5/25 at 10:01 am to
quote:

Well, you're a woman.



I'm a parent of small children.


quote:

Women are more likely to say, "Nah, I'm good where I am," rather than seeking to climb higher on whatever ladder they have available to them to avoid the commitment of more time/energy.
Mothers are the primary caregivers of their children (and husbands).

quote:

Either put on some man-pants and do your 40 hours a week acting like a man and hate it, or be a wife and a mother and take care of the household.



Thanks to the men who have ruled our government and economy for hundreds of years, most women now have to do both.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram