- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 1/6/26 at 6:53 pm to AUstar
quote:
And they never will because Trump is the one proposing it. You will always have the 3 or 4 libertarian Repubs reject it, and of course 100% of Democrats. We simply don't have the votes in Congress and likely never will. This is why Congress is absolutely worthless.
You are correct more than likely. Let us hope that we can shove through election reforms and then it is very much possible. Until then probably not.
Posted on 1/6/26 at 7:14 pm to tigersbh
Democrats did not bring this before the courts. It was two family owned toy manufacturers who have their products made in China. The two companies are Hand2Mind and learning Resources. They had to raise their retail prices by about 70% to make up for the new tariffs that they were being charged.
Posted on 1/6/26 at 8:40 pm to hogcard1964
quote:
He has the right to regulate importation. It all falls under IEEPAA - International Emergency Economic Powers Act. Can the result affect taxes? Sure, but is it technically a tax? No
You might be right. We'll see soon.
Posted on 1/6/26 at 9:03 pm to tigersbh
quote:
Why are Democrats even taking this to court in the first place?
Because it’s good for America.
WTF?
Posted on 1/6/26 at 10:01 pm to hawgfaninc
quote:
77% chance the SC rules tariffs are illegal, possible ruling this Friday
Seriously? Come on.
Posted on 1/6/26 at 10:34 pm to hawgfaninc
How many tariffs are instituted via IEEPA?
I know all the tariffs are not. Some are through the trade expansion act.
I know all the tariffs are not. Some are through the trade expansion act.
Posted on 1/6/26 at 11:30 pm to Trevaylin
quote:
congress hasn't negotiated a budget with itself in 30 years.
congress set up medicade rules that allowed billions of dollars of Somali theft
congress was able to pas 3 bills last year
congess will not outlaw congress inside trading
congress can't function
congress just f.cks around and SFP wants them to do work?
Look the way the system works is you gotta to get enough people to get angry and vote out almost all of Congress. Then you tell them to prohibit lobbyist in DC
Its been a cesspool for a very long time and many of the issues we currently have are because of a historically weak Congress (i.e. Last 30 years or so)
This post was edited on 1/6/26 at 11:31 pm
Posted on 1/7/26 at 10:21 am to Pfft
quote:
So all tarriffs that other countries impose are illegal as well?
Posted on 1/7/26 at 10:22 am to tigersbh
quote:
Why are Democrats even taking this to court in the first place?
TDS and get OMB.
Posted on 1/7/26 at 10:25 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The thing that's infuriating is there are so many dumb questions and comments
The irony...
Posted on 1/7/26 at 10:26 am to PsychTiger
quote:
The sheer amount of folks you’re triggering has really increased in the last year. You must be really happy about your success
They're not nearly as triggered as that nerd is over Trump and MAGA. His TDS is off the charts.
Posted on 1/7/26 at 10:27 am to BTROleMisser
Thanks for the laugh 
Especially after this post
As I said, dumb questions and comments
Especially after this post
As I said, dumb questions and comments
Posted on 1/7/26 at 10:27 am to hogcard1964
quote:
I expect it to be 6-3 with the usual whack jobs dissenting. Maybe 5-4 with Roberts being a turncoat again.
If they rule in favor of the Trump admin, I would bet a 5-4 decision on this one.
Posted on 1/7/26 at 10:29 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
quote:
. You must be really happy about your success.
It's incredibly annoying, actually.
You are incredibly annoying, ackshully.
Posted on 1/7/26 at 10:31 am to hogcard1964
quote:
He has the right to regulate importation. It all falls under IEEPAA - International Emergency Economic Powers Act. Can the result affect taxes? Sure, but is it technically a tax? No
This.
Posted on 1/7/26 at 10:33 am to nealnan8
quote:
Democrats did not bring this before the courts. It was two family owned toy manufacturers who have their products made in China. The two companies are Hand2Mind and learning Resources. They had to raise their retail prices by about 70% to make up for the new tariffs that they were being charged.
I'm sure they had plenty of encouragement from Democrats to bring these suits.
Posted on 1/7/26 at 10:38 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
As I said, dumb questions and comments
You're not NEARLY the genius you believe you are in your own mind there, guy. I promise you. Your holier than thou, know it all (while simultaneously knowing nothing) bloviating on here day in and day out is about insufferable.
Posted on 1/7/26 at 10:44 am to Pfft
quote:
So all tarriffs that other countries impose are illegal as well?
I'm not an expert, but it sounds like what's being argued isn't the constitutionality of tariffs themselves, but whether the President has the authority to institute them unilaterally.
Posted on 1/7/26 at 11:52 am to hawgfaninc
Congress did give the President authority to charge tariffs including the following situation:
Section 301 (Trade Act of 1974): Grants authority to retaliate against "unfair" foreign trade practices, investigated by the USTR.
It seems like this could be applied to most situations. However, I don't think the President has the authority to make blanket worldwide changes to the tariffs. So you can't change it worldwide but you can on an individual basis. That's how I read it anyway. If I'm right then Trump must get the USTR to agree that a country is trading unfairly.
Section 301 (Trade Act of 1974): Grants authority to retaliate against "unfair" foreign trade practices, investigated by the USTR.
It seems like this could be applied to most situations. However, I don't think the President has the authority to make blanket worldwide changes to the tariffs. So you can't change it worldwide but you can on an individual basis. That's how I read it anyway. If I'm right then Trump must get the USTR to agree that a country is trading unfairly.
Page 5 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News