- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Accused Assassin Captured in Minnesota
Posted on 6/16/25 at 7:45 am to jimmy the leg
Posted on 6/16/25 at 7:45 am to jimmy the leg
quote:
According to you, JBE is further right than Cassidy.
He is not.
quote:
Eat your pretzels.
No pretzels. You left out the pertinent MAGA variables that I discussed in the post.
This post was edited on 6/16/25 at 7:46 am
Posted on 6/16/25 at 7:45 am to Wolfhound45
quote:
This unbiased observer has made it abundantly clear in his posts that the motivation of the accused is that he was an Evangelical Christian
You can't read, if that's your assessment.
quote:
He has provided no proof of this but that has not stopped him from making that assertion.
I've provided lots of proof
Posted on 6/16/25 at 7:47 am to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
If Minnesota were THAT radical and the guy were a leftist, don't you think they would have killed him rather than captured him to avoid risking exposure of Walz's diabolical plot?
They usually don’t kill the guy they are going after if they aren’t shooting at the cops.
Posted on 6/16/25 at 7:48 am to dupergreenie
quote:
rather the guy went after the person who voted against the democrats.
I agree with most of your post. But, the "voted against the democrats" as a motive is preposterous. Half of the legislators he shot voted WITH the Democrats.
This post was edited on 6/16/25 at 8:30 am
Posted on 6/16/25 at 7:49 am to I20goon
quote:
Not sure if "Tim Walz" associate is accurate; is more reaching or wishful thinking than anything. That working group is a very minor appointment and had no control, enforcement, or policy powers.
Correct
It's only being amplified because the argument that he was a Leftist is so barren of evidence. They have to contort 2 data points to keep the ruse going.
Just like the "he shot a DEM who didn't vote with the party" theory that is complete weak sauce.
But, that's literally all they have to hold onto to keep the echo chamber narrative going, and admitting they were taken by grifters again is a burden too hard to endure, apparently. They'd rather triple down on the lie.
Posted on 6/16/25 at 7:52 am to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
agree with most of your post. But, the "voted against the democrats" as a motive is preposterous. Half of the legislators she shot voted WITH the Democrats.
She literally cast the tie breaking vote to pass the budget.
Posted on 6/16/25 at 7:54 am to dupergreenie
quote:
She literally cast the tie breaking vote to pass the budget.
A vote that passed 68-65?
Posted on 6/16/25 at 7:54 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Just like the "he shot a DEM who didn't vote with the party" theory that is complete weak sauce.
Why did he start with these two specific people then?
Posted on 6/16/25 at 7:55 am to SlowFlowPro
I just read on CNN that they are reporting that she was on/also appointed to the same committee that waltz appointed him to
Posted on 6/16/25 at 7:55 am to SlowFlowPro
No, you have not. You have linked;
A Wired article
A Religion News Service article which cited the Wired article
An archived website that has no linked sub-pages
An archived website for a book that was not written
A sermon on YouTube
Which of them has any content which outlines his belief system or possible propensity for violence? The only evidence you have is his opposition to abortion and transgenderism found in the sermon.
A typical SFP series of posts.
Congrats.
A Wired article
A Religion News Service article which cited the Wired article
An archived website that has no linked sub-pages
An archived website for a book that was not written
A sermon on YouTube
Which of them has any content which outlines his belief system or possible propensity for violence? The only evidence you have is his opposition to abortion and transgenderism found in the sermon.
A typical SFP series of posts.
Congrats.
Posted on 6/16/25 at 7:56 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
My guess is the abortion issue is his motivation and that his personal politics of extreme social conservatism were motivators.
quote:
you seem to be confusing is the Evangelical Christian status and its place in the discussion. You keep creating a straw man that I'm using it as evidence of motivation for the shooting, when I am not.
quote:straw man?
My guess is the abortion issue is his motivation and that his personal politics of extreme social conservatism were motivators.
quote:It would seem I'm not the one confusing things.
the abortion issue is his motivation and that his personal politics of extreme social conservatism were motivators.
Posted on 6/16/25 at 7:57 am to Wolfhound45
quote:
No, you have not. You have linked;
A Wired article
A Religion News Service article which cited the Wired article
An archived website that has no linked sub-pages
An archived website for a book that was not written
A sermon on YouTube
Which of them has any content which outlines his belief system or possible propensity for violence? The only evidence you have is his opposition to abortion and transgenderism found in the sermon.
A typical SFP series of posts.
Congrats.
He will scour the internet to defend his far left loon ilk
Posted on 6/16/25 at 7:58 am to HailToTheChiz
quote:
Just like the "he shot a DEM who didn't vote with the party" theory that is complete weak sauce.
quote:correct me if I'm wrong, didn't only 1 of the 2 recently vote against party lines in the medicare for illegals vote?
Why did he start with these two specific people then?
Tim Walz, amongst many others, have been begging for war. Biden declared it on us. Many have picked up what Biden put down. This guy obliged.
Posted on 6/16/25 at 7:58 am to dgnx6
quote:
They usually don’t kill the guy they are going after if they aren’t shooting at the cops.
But the nut jobs are suggesting that none of this is usual. Despite two liberal Democrats being shot, one of whom voted with the Dems on the illegals health care bill, this was a Leftist plot to enforce party discipline. Why would they get squeamish about tying up a loose end?
Posted on 6/16/25 at 7:59 am to Old Sarge
quote:
I just read on CNN that they are reporting that she was on/also appointed to the same committee that waltz appointed him to
Hoffman was. I don't think Hortman was
Posted on 6/16/25 at 8:00 am to Wolfhound45
quote:
Which of them has any content which outlines his belief system or possible propensity for violence?
That's a pivot
Posted on 6/16/25 at 8:01 am to HailToTheChiz
quote:
Why did he start with these two specific people then?
We don't know yet.
Posted on 6/16/25 at 8:02 am to SDVTiger
quote:
He will scour the internet to defend his far left loon ilk
The belligerent glorification of ignorance gets tiresome. SFP actually did the work to bring in evidence. You might not accept it as PROOF, but what evidence are you bringing to the discussion other than insults or assumptions?
If someone has evidence of Boelter saying or doing Leftist things, I would appreciate seeing that.
This post was edited on 6/16/25 at 8:04 am
Popular
Back to top



1







