- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Another Federal judge trying to frick up the country once again.
Posted on 1/17/26 at 6:10 am
Posted on 1/17/26 at 6:10 am
quote:
Judge limits ICE’s crowd control tactics following Minneapolis shooting
LINK
This single biggest lie in this article is this……
“Peaceful observers and protesters turned out again today, they will turn out again tomorrow, and they will continue turning out every day until Operation Metro Surge is over,”
Peacefully arse.
3
Posted on 1/17/26 at 6:21 am to Geekboy
quote:How could anyone possibly disagree with that sentence?
“Peaceful observers and protesters turned out again today, they will turn out again tomorrow, and they will continue turning out every day until Operation Metro Surge is over,”
Peacefully arse
Every day there are peaceful protesters. And every day there are violent protesters. Peaceful ones need to be allowed to protest peacefully. Violent ones need to be thrown in prison. Because no shite.
fricking sock puppets here can’t imagine holding two thoughts in their head at the same time.
Posted on 1/17/26 at 6:27 am to funnystuff
quote:
How could anyone possibly disagree with that sentence? Every day there are peaceful protesters. And every day there are violent protesters. Peaceful ones need to be allowed to protest peacefully. Violent ones need to be thrown in prison. Because no shite.
They don’t support our Constitution.
Posted on 1/17/26 at 6:33 am to onmymedicalgrind
What a stupid fricking excuse.
Let peaceful protesters protest peacefully. Arrest and jail violent protesters. That’s how our system was built to work from day 1. You don’t like, you leave.
Let peaceful protesters protest peacefully. Arrest and jail violent protesters. That’s how our system was built to work from day 1. You don’t like, you leave.
Posted on 1/17/26 at 6:36 am to Geekboy
Trump needs to send in the military and tell that judge to pound sand.
Posted on 1/17/26 at 6:42 am to funnystuff
quote:
Violent ones need to be thrown in prison
did he make any reference to that truth?? = which happens to be 99.9999% of all ICE actions??
Posted on 1/17/26 at 6:44 am to funnystuff
quote:
fricking sock puppets here can’t imagine holding two thoughts in their head at the same time.
Look in the mirror, sock puppet.
You don’t seem to know that a half-truth is still a lie, a lie by omission. The weak minded fall so easily under the sway of propaganda.
Posted on 1/17/26 at 6:49 am to funnystuff
quote:
Let peaceful protesters protest peacefully. Arrest and jail violent protesters.
I’m willing to bet that your definition of ‘peaceful protest” is different than mine.
Furthermore, even protesting by bullhorn marches and making a general disturbance is fruitless unless your intention is to foment an angry action, both for and against.
Posted on 1/17/26 at 6:54 am to Jimbeaux
quote:
I’m willing to bet that your definition of ‘peaceful protest” is different than mine.
However you define it, do you agree that peaceful protesters should not be arrested?
quote:
Furthermore, even protesting by bullhorn marches and making a general disturbance is fruitless unless your intention is to foment an angry action, both for and against.
Your opinion of people’s “intention” is as irrelevant as the price of tea in China. All that matters is if their conduct is Constitutionally protected.
Posted on 1/17/26 at 6:59 am to Jimbeaux
You define peaceful protests first… demonstrate that there is a version of protesting in Minnesota that you would consider peaceful. Establish that limiting principle, and we can work backwards from there together to identify where our definitions differ.
Posted on 1/17/26 at 7:05 am to funnystuff
quote:
You define peaceful protests first… demonstrate that there is a version of protesting in Minnesota that you would consider peaceful. Establish that limiting principle, and we can work backwards from there together to identify where our definitions differ.
For me, the definition is unambiguous. Any activity that jeopardizes the function and safety of law enforcement officers in their performance of lawful police duties is not a peaceful protest.
Posted on 1/17/26 at 7:07 am to onmymedicalgrind
quote:
However you define it, do you agree that peaceful protesters should not be arrested?
Are peaceful protestors being arrested?
Posted on 1/17/26 at 7:12 am to ChineseBandit58
quote:Yes, the judge did. She clearly stated that law enforcement actions are justified when protesters generate an actual threat, obstruct, or interfere with an operation.
did he make any reference to that truth??
This was an 80 page ruling and y’all have looked at a grand total of 3 sentences in it.
Also…
quote:that’s fricking dumb.
which happens to be 99.9999% of all ICE actions??
Posted on 1/17/26 at 7:18 am to Jimbeaux
quote:
Any activity that jeopardizes the function and safety of law enforcement officers in their performance of lawful police duties is not a peaceful protest
Great. Looks like you agree that peacefully observing is A-OK in your book.
Posted on 1/17/26 at 7:20 am to onmymedicalgrind
quote:
Your opinion of people’s “intention” is as irrelevant as the price of tea in China. All that matters is if their conduct is Constitutionally protected.
There is a category of behavior that is both legal and allowed, but also can be harmful to society.
Lots of ‘dissenters’ to social behavior, government policy, corporate behavior, etc. can and do try to conduct conversations, interviews, engage in civil debate, set up Q&A tables, etc.
These activities aren’t in even in the generally accepted definition of protest, even though the speakers are speaking their protestations.
More and more, the left will “protest” these peaceful speakers with megaphones, public shaming, violence, and cancellations. They say things like “silence is violence”, or “don’t you dare ‘platform’ these ideas or else.
That is all to say that, yes, intentions matter in the realm of protest, whether or not the protester’s actions are technically legal (for now - look at Great Britain in 2025 for the dystopian future in store if the left continues on this trajectory.)
Posted on 1/17/26 at 7:24 am to onmymedicalgrind
quote:
Great. Looks like you agree that peacefully observing is A-OK in your book.
Yes of course. As long as the observing is taking place beyond the distance of a reasonable reactionary gap.
Shouting at the back of officers within 5 feet of the officers who are conducting an arrest is not peaceable.
Blowing whistles to warn illegals to run from arrest is obstruction. Do you consider that action to be peaceful protest?
Posted on 1/17/26 at 7:28 am to Geekboy
I believe this is the second judge trying to do this. It doesn’t mean anything.
Posted on 1/17/26 at 7:34 am to funnystuff
quote:
Every day there are peaceful protesters
Were the two dyke bitches protesting peacefully in your opinion?
Posted on 1/17/26 at 7:36 am to crimsonsaint
quote:
Are peaceful protestors being arrested?
Idk, I don’t have my boots on the ground following the circumstances behind every arrest. Do you?
I do know that, as someone who is a fan of our Constitution, I have no problem with a judge telling LEOs that peaceful protesters should not be arrested. It’s a kind of “water is wet” statement, so not sure why it’s rustling so many jimmies.
Posted on 1/17/26 at 7:38 am to onmymedicalgrind
quote:
However you define it, do you agree that peaceful protesters should not be arrested?
Peaceful protesters aren’t the ones being detained. The ones blocking streets, blocking buildings, bum rushing officers are.
That should solve any conundrum for you.
Page 1 of 2
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News