- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Boasberg plans to move quickly on Trump contempt inquiry in major immigration case
Posted on 11/25/25 at 4:24 pm to I20goon
Posted on 11/25/25 at 4:24 pm to I20goon
quote:If officials of an executive branch department violate the law, the "only" solution is to impeach the sitting president?
The constitution provides for one solution and one solution only to a President acting "unlawfully" ... impeachment
Dude, put down the pipe.
1
Posted on 11/25/25 at 4:31 pm to loogaroo
No jurisdiction. No members of the administration were served.
Posted on 11/25/25 at 4:45 pm to CR4090
quote:Yes, and that process has gone exactly nowhere. It was political grandstanding, taken seriously by no one.
I thought articles of impeachment were filed against this clown?
This post was edited on 11/25/25 at 4:51 pm
Posted on 11/25/25 at 5:18 pm to Decatur
quote:Just not a good look.
hasn’t been adjudicated.
I get it.
It's lawyer-think,
and you are good at it.
But come on!
At times like this, it's easy to get lost in the forest by focusing on individual trees. You need to step away from efforts at magnificent legal genius on a non-lawyer board, and drift back to actual pragmatism. Whatever your effort or various motivations here, you will do better with that approach.
Posted on 11/25/25 at 5:38 pm to Decatur
Bet you’re okay with the military being told not to obey orders, amirite?
Posted on 11/25/25 at 5:39 pm to Decatur
quote:
For disobeying a court order? What line of cases is this?
Before I post them. Will you admit you were ignorant to the fact they exist?
Posted on 11/25/25 at 5:40 pm to BBONDS25
I’ve never had the opportunity to research ways to violate a court order. Please post.
Posted on 11/25/25 at 5:42 pm to Decatur
quote:
I’ve never had the opportunity to research ways to violate a court order. Please post.
Andrew Jackson wants you to hold his beer.
Posted on 11/25/25 at 5:49 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
Yes, and that process has gone exactly nowhere. It was political grandstanding, taken seriously by no one.
Just like the impeachments of trump? That was political grandstanding, taken seriously by no one other than idiots like you. The difference is that the impeachments were brought by a made up Russia collusion that has been proven to be part of a coup. The impeachment of this judge are built upon facts. Enjoy the show as the plot thickens. Your side will not like the ending.
This post was edited on 11/25/25 at 5:55 pm
Posted on 11/25/25 at 5:59 pm to Decatur
quote:
I’ve never had the opportunity to research ways to violate a court order. Please post.
So you admit you’re ignorant to their existence?
Posted on 11/25/25 at 6:05 pm to BBONDS25
My man I have been asking for hours. 
Posted on 11/25/25 at 6:19 pm to Decatur
quote:
My man I have been asking for hours.
Just want to know if I list one if you will acknowledge your ignorance. Yes or no? Walk right into my trap.
This post was edited on 11/25/25 at 6:19 pm
Posted on 11/25/25 at 6:22 pm to Decatur
quote:
You can’t ignore court orders.
As usual, you're in here clapping like a seal for corruption, you fricking muppet.
Posted on 11/25/25 at 6:22 pm to BBONDS25
Spring the trap, daddy
This post was edited on 11/25/25 at 6:23 pm
Posted on 11/25/25 at 6:29 pm to Decatur
quote:
Spring the trap, daddy
You didn’t answer my question. As predicted.
Appreciate youre admitting your ignorance.
This post was edited on 11/25/25 at 6:32 pm
Posted on 11/25/25 at 6:41 pm to BBONDS25
At least you can give me a case name I can follow up on. Help a brother out.
Posted on 11/25/25 at 6:45 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
if I list one
So far you have listed zero.
You seemed so confident a few hours ago.....now, not so much.
Posted on 11/25/25 at 6:52 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
If officials of an executive branch department violate the law, the "only" solution is to impeach the sitting president? Dude, put down the pipe.
They didn't violate law. They gave the finger to an unconstitutional ruling from Obama's boyfriend.
quote:
The constitution provides for one solution and one solution only to a President acting "unlawfully" ... impeachment
This is regarding the president & not "officials"
Posted on 11/25/25 at 7:08 pm to Bama Mountain
quote:
So far you have listed zero. You seemed so confident a few hours ago.....now, not so much.
STFU and stay out of this. Let these two figure it out.
Posted on 11/25/25 at 7:31 pm to Warboo
quote:Very similar, yes. Zero chance of a "conviction" in either case..
Yes, and that process has gone exactly nowhere. It was political grandstanding, taken seriously by no one.quote:
Just like the impeachments of trump? That was political grandstanding
quote:Whatever you say, friend.
taken seriously by no one other than idiots like you
quote:Again, whatever you say.
The impeachment of this judge are built upon facts.
The Dems impeached Trump for little more reason than the fact that they did not like him. Trump is encouraging the impeachment of Boasberg because he doesn't like the judge's rulings.
Page 6 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News