- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Boston 2024 Election turnout
Posted on 11/23/24 at 5:07 am to Big4SALTbro
Posted on 11/23/24 at 5:07 am to Big4SALTbro
about 2/3rds of the people eligible to vote actually register and vote.
what I dont understand, how can you have more than 100% registered to vote, they arent even registered so how can they place a vote?
what I dont understand, how can you have more than 100% registered to vote, they arent even registered so how can they place a vote?
3
Posted on 11/23/24 at 5:20 am to trinidadtiger
What you need to do is compare those states with 100% or better with whether they have same day voter registration. Same day voter registration is an open invitation to fraud.
Posted on 11/23/24 at 5:29 am to trinidadtiger
Yea it’s hard to come up with a legit excuse for it. You either have illegals voting, non registered people voting or you are double counting votes.
Its just odd this isn’t happening in Forsyth county GA which is full of all ruby red precincts but is happening in strictly blue cities.
I would love to see their defense of why you can have over 100 percent in a precinct.
That leads to the next question why is no one in the RNC making noise about this? It’s either not happening or it is and they ignoring it to keep tight races and fraud.
Fraud isn’t helping the right at all because they aren’t in the game like the Dems. The Dems have the cheating game down and the right lets it happen. It’s either they want to continue to be the Washington generals or they are scared of the left media labeling them a election denier despite evidence that says the election is fraud.
Its just odd this isn’t happening in Forsyth county GA which is full of all ruby red precincts but is happening in strictly blue cities.
I would love to see their defense of why you can have over 100 percent in a precinct.
That leads to the next question why is no one in the RNC making noise about this? It’s either not happening or it is and they ignoring it to keep tight races and fraud.
Fraud isn’t helping the right at all because they aren’t in the game like the Dems. The Dems have the cheating game down and the right lets it happen. It’s either they want to continue to be the Washington generals or they are scared of the left media labeling them a election denier despite evidence that says the election is fraud.
Posted on 11/23/24 at 5:31 am to NewbombII
Pretty much everything the Dems push for election is for them to enable fraud.
No ID- why else would you have that other than fraud.
Same day registration, sending everyone mail in ballots, wanting no cameras on ballot drop spots.
No ID- why else would you have that other than fraud.
Same day registration, sending everyone mail in ballots, wanting no cameras on ballot drop spots.
Posted on 11/23/24 at 6:01 am to John Barron
That’s like that for many urban areas, shows depth of corruption
Posted on 11/23/24 at 6:22 am to OWLFAN86
Good grief you sound like a pussy
Posted on 11/23/24 at 6:25 am to John Barron
All deep blue states are rigged
Posted on 11/23/24 at 6:35 am to Rebel
Lake Charles litigator will have no comment on this thread.
Posted on 11/23/24 at 6:54 am to John Barron
For those interested in where the data comes from: boston.gov That's right, for any fraud deniers out there, the city's own website published this.
To be fair, these are the "unofficial" numbers, not sure what the technical difference is between "official" and "unofficial" other than "we have to adjust for the extra votes". Michelle Wu would be furious if she knew, but she's too busy protecting illegal immigrants.
To be fair, these are the "unofficial" numbers, not sure what the technical difference is between "official" and "unofficial" other than "we have to adjust for the extra votes". Michelle Wu would be furious if she knew, but she's too busy protecting illegal immigrants.
Posted on 11/23/24 at 6:56 am to John Barron
The source of those numbers prefaces with this, which is not clear to me...
City of Boston website
Click on "unofficial ward and precinct results for state election (November 5 2024)" for the source of the numbers.
quote:The numbers were last updated the day after the election.
Note: Percentages are based on a two-card per voter scan, therefore the percentage is not accurate if divided in half. It's just an estimated turnout
City of Boston website
Click on "unofficial ward and precinct results for state election (November 5 2024)" for the source of the numbers.
Posted on 11/23/24 at 7:04 am to crossfire
i felt like Trump would win despite all this, and long planned to ignore all the overcounting that is done in these precincts with so many double and "nonstandard" votes being counted.
Posted on 11/23/24 at 7:15 am to John Barron
If there is one place the DEMs need to cheat to win, it's Boston/Massachusetts 
Posted on 11/23/24 at 7:17 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
If there is one place the DEMs need to cheat to win, it's Boston/Massachusetts
The evidence suggest that you are correct.
Posted on 11/23/24 at 7:24 am to LSUSkip
quote:
Saw a voting map of Cali in 2020 vs 2024 and it is hardly blue. LA carries that state, but 90% of the other counties were red in 2024.
People vote. Land doesn't.
Now, Kamala did worse with DEMs than Biden in 2020, especially in super blue areas, but she still dominated California in total.
9.17M to 5.97M
Posted on 11/23/24 at 7:25 am to Warboo
quote:
The evidence suggest that you are correct.
Or, to a logical person, the evidence you're using doesn't confirm your pre-existing beliefs. There is no reason the DEMs would invest resources in cheating in a place like Massachussets or Boston.
MA is more Democrat-leaning than CA
This post was edited on 11/23/24 at 7:26 am
Posted on 11/23/24 at 7:29 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Or, to a logical person, the evidence you're using doesn't confirm your pre-existing beliefs. There is no reason the DEMs would invest resources in cheating in a place like Massachussets or Boston.
Well then why did they cheat? The numbers are impossible without fraud but yet here we are.
Posted on 11/23/24 at 7:30 am to Warboo
quote:
Well then why did they cheat?
An assumption without evidence.
You're "connecting dots" but not really proving/arguing anything of substance.
quote:
The numbers are impossible without fraud
Turning your assumption into a point of authority, without any backing.
A logical person would figure out how these numbers are possible without fraud. It's probably not that complicated.
Posted on 11/23/24 at 7:32 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
A logical person would figure out how these numbers are possible without fraud. It's probably not that complicated.
Well Mr Logical, give it your best shot. Lay it out there.
Posted on 11/23/24 at 7:36 am to Warboo
quote:
Well Mr Logical, give it your best shot. Lay it out there.
Typically, people are just reading the charts wrong and misrepresenting the data.
I did a google search and found this story
quote:
Boston officials blamed a “miscalculation” for multiple polling locations running out of ballots Tuesday, an issue that prompted Massachusetts' top elections official to consider a temporary state takeover of the city’s elections division.
At voting sites in multiple Boston neighborhoods, ballots ran short and election workers were unable to reach City Hall to request more, officials said. As voters waited, Secretary of State William Galvin’s office instructed city officials to have police rush additional ballots to the polls with their blue lights flashing and sirens blaring.
That isn't likely an explanation of the problem but just a funny muh steal meme, but in one of the most blue areas of the country.
Typically followed with the "it's funny how this only happens one way" lines, which, turns out, aren't true.
Posted on 11/23/24 at 7:42 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Kamala did worse with DEMs than Biden in 2020, especially in super blue areas, but she still dominated California in total. 9.17M to 5.97M
Sure…if you trust the numbers.
Why should I?
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News