- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Can we 'disappear the homeless' here too?
Posted on 8/22/25 at 7:31 am to 4cubbies
Posted on 8/22/25 at 7:31 am to 4cubbies
quote:
Another small government conservative who wants the federal government to rule every facet of society so he can roll the windows down in his car without being afraid.
another big government liberal that wallows in chaos and dysfunction there's a reason you poor cubbie.
1
Posted on 8/22/25 at 7:32 am to Smeg
lol... It is called a "spit hood". Every police department in the country uses them. They keep the fluids in, but the person can see and breathe fine.
Posted on 8/22/25 at 7:33 am to Smeg
The homeless should be executed and their organs harvested
Posted on 8/22/25 at 7:35 am to Smeg
quote:
Usually I drive around with the windows up and AC on. Last week I thought it might be nice to drive with the windows down and feel the breeze. Unfortunately it seems there are homeless bums begging with signs at almost every other intersection in the city of Dallas. I didn't want them approaching and talking to me, which is way more likely with the windows down. Finally I realized I can't even peacefully drive in the city with the windows down. They ruin the experience.
This post was edited on 8/22/25 at 7:38 am
Posted on 8/22/25 at 7:40 am to Smeg
Jesus. The fricking crazy loons strike again.
The bag over the bread is too prevent them from spitting on law enforcement.
Just FYI, they spit on police, they would definitely spit on you walking by them.
I can't understand why liberals feel that public property allows homeless people to claim it. That's not the way it works. They are for the public to share.
Homeless should not be allowed to live in large train stations. They do this because they don't want to stay in a shelter and follow the rules. No drinking and no drugs.
Trump is doing a great job.
The bag over the bread is too prevent them from spitting on law enforcement.
Just FYI, they spit on police, they would definitely spit on you walking by them.
I can't understand why liberals feel that public property allows homeless people to claim it. That's not the way it works. They are for the public to share.
Homeless should not be allowed to live in large train stations. They do this because they don't want to stay in a shelter and follow the rules. No drinking and no drugs.
Trump is doing a great job.
Posted on 8/22/25 at 7:45 am to Decatur
quote:
Decatur
Which of these city streets do you prefer?
Do you want your tax dollars spent on trying to be the top or bottom picture?
Explain your answer.
Posted on 8/22/25 at 7:47 am to Decatur
quote:
Decatur
a self-righteous crime supporting prick who doesn't have to live anywhere near the areas his policies befoul
frick you
Posted on 8/22/25 at 8:35 am to Smeg
Late 90s and early 2000s the progressives began their initial run at religious organizations. They started putting regulations and laws in the way of helping homeless and drug addicts. Many Catholic, Methodist and Baptist inner city missions had to shut down because of red tape. (as well as other religious groups)
Interestingly enough they pivoted to illegal aliens after that, but they helped manage the "homeless" insane and drug addict people in and around cities for decades. We should allow them to go back to that again.
Still, most homeless do not want to live by the rules of the shelter. For them there should be prison.
Interestingly enough they pivoted to illegal aliens after that, but they helped manage the "homeless" insane and drug addict people in and around cities for decades. We should allow them to go back to that again.
Still, most homeless do not want to live by the rules of the shelter. For them there should be prison.
Posted on 8/22/25 at 8:38 am to scottydoesntknow
quote:
Ok worst case scenario...federal troops stay indefinitely in the city...and the city just stays safe indefinitely? Youre really painting a bleak picture here
amazing how many of you want to live in East Berlin
Posted on 8/22/25 at 8:41 am to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
amazing how many of you want to live in East Berlin
Posted on 8/22/25 at 8:43 am to Breesus
True. The State Police partnership with NOPD has made a positive difference.
Federal troops and/or the National Guard amounts to overreach, and, in the end is counterproductive.
Federal troops and/or the National Guard amounts to overreach, and, in the end is counterproductive.
Posted on 8/22/25 at 8:44 am to Smeg
Remember all those FEMA coffins from years back, makes you wonder.
Posted on 8/22/25 at 8:44 am to Breesus
quote:
It is the state and local officials who need to clean up their parts of the country.
Exactly. If Baltimore, L.A., Oakland, St. Louis, etc, want to live in filth and squalor, that's between their residents and their local government. Someone in the 'burbs in Texas shouldn't have to pay the federal government to clean up the slums of San Francisco.
Posted on 8/22/25 at 8:45 am to Smeg
The god that made you made them to.
Posted on 8/22/25 at 8:50 am to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
amazing how many of you want to live in East Berlin
I honestly don’t get this point. How is the mere presence of nat guard on streets of DC akin to east Berlin?
If they stay within their mission of law enforcement and clearly homeless encampments from public areas, it’s essentially a city cleanup program, not stasi communism.
Do you think the nat guard is randomly arresting people and killing random people?
Posted on 8/22/25 at 8:53 am to BuckI
And?
Posted on 8/22/25 at 8:53 am to Smeg
I say we start a program to move all the urban homeless to the rurals so we can take nice pictures of the cities like you want.
Posted on 8/22/25 at 8:54 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
i was responding to the poster who said let’s just have federal troops in all cities indefinitely
i personally think what’s happening in DC is executive overreach but it was (stupidly) legalized by Congress for up to 30 days. we’ll see what he does when the 30 days are up.
i know most of you only care about red team vs blue team but i think the checks and balances are important
i also don’t think we should be “disappearing” people for the crime of being homeless.
i personally think what’s happening in DC is executive overreach but it was (stupidly) legalized by Congress for up to 30 days. we’ll see what he does when the 30 days are up.
i know most of you only care about red team vs blue team but i think the checks and balances are important
i also don’t think we should be “disappearing” people for the crime of being homeless.
This post was edited on 8/22/25 at 8:56 am
Posted on 8/22/25 at 8:56 am to RoyalWe
quote:Nothing else need be said.
And?
Posted on 8/22/25 at 8:58 am to RohanGonzales
quote:
a self-righteous crime supporting prick who doesn't have to live anywhere near the areas his policies befoul
I see homeless people almost every single day.
Page 2 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News