- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Candice Owens is a straight up lunatic.
Posted on 10/25/25 at 10:49 am to EphesianArmor
Posted on 10/25/25 at 10:49 am to EphesianArmor
quote:
Sorry, brutha. I can't agree with you on either.
I can expound on the actual cosmology, science and valid theories that take the opposite views, but maybe another time.
You crushed it on the 911 impossibility and on other issues that go against the grain.
People who believe every conspiracy lack critical thinking skills just as much as people who believe every official story.
I have no use for any of you.
1
Posted on 10/25/25 at 11:01 am to 3down10
quote:
People who believe every conspiracy lack critical thinking skills just as much as people who believe every official story.
I have no use for any of you.
I'm ok with that.
But just remember -- yesterday's "conspiracy theory" is tomorrow's reality. It's happening almost on a daily basis. Otoh, some of accepted dogma is already ossified into rock. I get it, NP.
Sometimes The Overton Window is never allowed to open without a crowbar.
Posted on 10/25/25 at 11:08 am to EphesianArmor
quote:
I'm ok with that.
But just remember -- yesterday's "conspiracy theory" is tomorrow's reality. It's happening almost on a daily basis. Otoh, some of accepted dogma is already ossified into rock. I get it, NP.
Sometimes The Overton Window is never allowed to open without a crowbar.
The world has been proven round for 1000's of years and there is literally no benefit from pretending otherwise.
Again, you'll never be able to show how my image where the sun lights the bottom of the clouds with a flat earth model. In fact, there is no such thing as a working flat earth model.
It's a complete myth that people in the middle ages thought the world was flat. In fact, they even knew the circumference of the earth 300 years before Jesus was born.
Your research is watching propaganda videos. People thousands of years ago had better critical thinking skills than you do today while having the wealth of the worlds knowledge in your palm.
And as for the moon landing, that's just people completely lacking any understanding of technology progression. It's only been recently that CGI has advanced to the point of being able to "fake" it, however it would STILL be easily debunked.
This post was edited on 10/25/25 at 11:09 am
Posted on 10/25/25 at 11:22 am to 3down10
quote:
Yes. Specifically a Boeing 707 traveling at speeds of 600mph.
Who told you that?This post was edited on 10/25/25 at 11:23 am
Posted on 10/25/25 at 11:23 am to EphesianArmor
quote:
That we were all led to believe a flimsy aluminum skin of a plane could crash through those robust steel columns, melt entirely[/i] into the building (no plane parts or wings falling off), THEN emerge through to the other side was impossible.
So what actually happened? Be specific.
Posted on 10/25/25 at 11:24 am to EphesianArmor
quote:
Don't talk, just shoot.
So you admit to being ignorant?
Posted on 10/25/25 at 11:27 am to BBONDS25
quote:
Who told you that?
A Boeing 707 was the largest plane at the time, and the speed was a calculation based on the amount of speed it could withstand with that amount of mass(obviously a 707 could never do 600mph).
Posted on 10/25/25 at 11:28 am to 3down10
quote:
A Boeing 707 was the largest plane at the time, and the speed was a calculation based on the amount of speed it could withstand with that amount of mass(obviously a 707 could never do 600mph).
Let me ask again. Who told you the building could absorb a jumbo jet flying into the tower at 600mph?
Posted on 10/25/25 at 11:29 am to BBONDS25
quote:
So what actually happened? Be specific.
Someone does not have to provide an alternative to prove something is false.
Theories are proven false over and over without such things.
Posted on 10/25/25 at 11:29 am to BBONDS25
quote:
Let me ask again. Who told you the building could absorb a jumbo jet flying into the tower at 600mph?
The engineers that designed it....
This was something they would make a point to mention while praising the new method for which it was constructed.
This post was edited on 10/25/25 at 11:31 am
Posted on 10/25/25 at 11:31 am to 3down10
quote:
Those are not support beams, they are merely cosmetic. Who are you trying to bullshite?
Jesus Christ.
Posted on 10/25/25 at 11:31 am to 3down10
quote:
The engineers that designed it....
that’s a lie. Posted on 10/25/25 at 11:31 am to 3down10
quote:
Someone does not have to provide an alternative to prove something is false. Theories are proven false over and over without such things.
just asking questions!!! Morons. Posted on 10/25/25 at 11:34 am to 3down10
quote:
Someone does not have to provide an alternative to prove something is false.
Sure. It’s just way less convincing when you’re poking holes in individual supposed facts without providing any real, coherent theory what actually happened.
Posted on 10/25/25 at 11:36 am to the808bass
quote:
Jesus Christ.
I agree, I'm absolutely shocked people are trying to argue these things without doing basic research on how the buildings were designed.
It was a "tube-in-a-tube" design.
The only thing used out there were for holding up the walls, not part of the core that keeps the building up.
Do you also think the bricks and siding on a house are part of what keeps a house standing?
Posted on 10/25/25 at 11:37 am to the808bass
quote:
Sure. It’s just way less convincing when you’re poking holes in individual supposed facts without providing any real, coherent theory what actually happened.
That's completely false and not at all how science works.
Posted on 10/25/25 at 11:37 am to the808bass
For the downvoters.
LINK
quote:
There were a total of 22, 892 columns that made up the exterior framing or “tube” of the WTC. This included 236 narrow columns per floor, 59 on each side, respectively. There were also two individual, non gravity loaded columns on each of the beveled corners of the structure. The column assemblies were prefabricated off site, and delivered in the order of assembly, was an innovation that allowed for rapid construction (about three floors per week). They were referred to as panels. The panels were three stories high, made of varying grades of steel, and were constructed with three 14 in x 14 in box columns. The columns were connected by two 52-inch spandrel plates and allowed for a 26-inch window opening. The panels were installed on floors 10-107. The panels served a number of purposes for the structure. They took half of the gravity load off the core, supported the preassembled floor systems, and were the principal resistor against the strong wind loads. The upper parts of the structure had fewer wind loads, and thus the steel on the top floors was as little as ¼-inch thick in certain areas, as opposed to 3-inches thick on the lower floors. (Figures 4 and 5).
LINK
Posted on 10/25/25 at 11:38 am to 3down10
No, it’s not. You’re just fricking idiot talking about things that you literally know almost nothing about.
Posted on 10/25/25 at 11:41 am to Snipe
quote:
Candice Owens
Her entire career arc is the biggest example of why famous people need some kind of artist representation and "spokesman" apparatus. When people like her have an uninterrupted forum to talk to the public, with no one to tell them to process things or to talk-it-out to, they're already on a timetable to self destruction.
She was on a trajectory to be massively successful. Ben Shapiro's partnership, like him or hate him, was a golden ring moment for her. Then I don't know what happened. She must have been on the rag or something and decided to "take on the Jews" for whatever reason.
Now she will always and forever be a batshit, looney tune cautionary tale.
Posted on 10/25/25 at 11:43 am to 3down10
quote:
That's completely false and not at all how science works.
clearly you’re not an engineer. Or a person with basic common sense. 
Page 7 of 17
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News