- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Carbon Capture
Posted on 1/16/25 at 1:27 pm to BayouBengals21
Posted on 1/16/25 at 1:27 pm to BayouBengals21
quote:
Problem with that is, this well will be right below our aquifer.
So worse case, you get carbonated water…
0
Posted on 1/16/25 at 1:30 pm to DeafVallyBatnR
quote:
They do not have imminent domain. This is not a utility.
Depends what state you’re in.
Louisiana Legislature passed a bill, and signed by the Governor, that actually allowed for pore space imminent domain for the planned CO2 storage “complex”. However, I’m not sure the LA DNR knows yet how to enact such in practice. Maybe they’ll do it similar to a hydrocarbon unit. In Louisiana, you must have at least 80% of the mineral owners within your proposed drilling unit either leased or participating as working interest owners. If you don’t, then you drilled a well in mineral trespass.
Posted on 1/16/25 at 1:33 pm to BayouBengals21
quote:
Apparently they’re going to “capture carbon and send it to a well 10,000 feet deep”. Problem with that is, this well will be right below our aquifer.
So free carbonated water???
Posted on 1/16/25 at 1:36 pm to BayouBengals21
The scientists that a have been silenced by the DEMS are now speaking the truth......carbon is good for the planet. Mother nature balances the equation every time.
Posted on 1/16/25 at 1:45 pm to ragincajun03
quote:
Maybe they’ll do it similar to a hydrocarbon unit. In Louisiana, you must have at least 80% of the mineral owners
Minerals owners have zero to do with storage. Surface owner controls storage. If Surface owner is mineral owner then I guess it does come in play.
Posted on 1/16/25 at 1:46 pm to BayouBengals21
Plenty safe, just a massive waste of money.
Are they piping it in or building something on site to capture from the air?
Are they piping it in or building something on site to capture from the air?
This post was edited on 1/16/25 at 1:50 pm
Posted on 1/16/25 at 1:50 pm to ragincajun03
quote:
Depends what state you’re in.
Louisiana Legislature passed a bill, and signed by the Governor, that actually allowed for pore space imminent domain for the planned CO2 storage “complex”. However, I’m not sure the LA DNR knows yet how to enact such in practice. Maybe they’ll do it similar to a hydrocarbon unit. In Louisiana, you must have at least 80% of the mineral owners within your proposed drilling unit either leased or participating as working interest owners. If you don’t, then you drilled a well in mineral trespass.
Good to know.
Posted on 1/16/25 at 1:52 pm to GumboPot
quote:
CO2 has a molecular weight of 44. Air has a molecular weight of about 28-29
That's interesting and makes sense.
The molecule that makes up .04% of our atmosphere is low to the ground, where the trees need it to thrive.
SO, how are "increased CO2 levels" raising the Earth's temperature?
By insulating the radiant heat collected by the Earth its self in the lowest levels of the atmosphere?
What is the R value of air density at sea level?
A twenty-five percent increase in CO2 levels brings the content to .05%.
None of the argument makes sense.
Plant more crops and tree and the non-existent problem is solved.
Posted on 1/16/25 at 1:56 pm to DeafVallyBatnR
quote:
Minerals owners have zero to do with storage. Surface owner controls storage.
I’m well aware the pore space is a surface owner issue/right in Louisiana.
I’m just trying to guess how the LA DNR and legal process might be used in practice in relation to the current Carbon Sequestration Act and statutes in Louisiana. Are they going to allow eminent domain of an entire storage complex, or will there need to be a certain threshold under an agreement, like with mineral pooling.
Posted on 1/16/25 at 2:45 pm to ragincajun03
quote:
I’m sure there’s a bunch of shady entities that have formed to try to take advantage of this “free” government cheese.
Yeah, we were one of them. Got a nice chunk of cheese out of it, too. We could have made a lot more, but that particular partnership was shaky, so we wisely abandoned that business.
But it really doesn’t matter; it’s all regulated. You have to permit a class VI well and install monitoring wells. And you have to maintain them. The government regulating bodies will be looking over your shoulder. And anyway, as we saw with Macondo, the big boys take short cuts just like the private equity backed groups.
Posted on 1/18/25 at 5:59 pm to GumboPot
quote:
Remember your p-chem
No I don’t
Posted on 1/18/25 at 7:21 pm to BayouBengals21
quote:Start it in China and India. If it's cost effective, then not a problem with it.
What’s the boards opinion on this?
Posted on 1/18/25 at 7:29 pm to Diamondawg
Hard to believe people can be this ignorant, uninformed and stupid….
Why not start fart capture?
Why not start fart capture?
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News