- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 12/12/18 at 11:23 am to Walt OReilly
How much time does he actually do?
BTW, his daughter is fine as frick
BTW, his daughter is fine as frick
Posted on 12/12/18 at 11:24 am to Jbird
quote:
Tick Tock TigerHannity
Speaking of Sean, one of the funnier parts of this ordeal was when Judge Wood forced Cohen to reveal Hannity as one of his 3 clients in open court.
That feeling you get when your attorney gets 3 years -->

Posted on 12/12/18 at 11:27 am to Walt OReilly
I’m still confused about the campaign finance crime angle of the payoffs.
Posted on 12/12/18 at 11:30 am to Jjdoc
Without watching a single minute of tv coverage or reading a single article, I can guarantee you that the media narrative is: “OMG, if he’s getting 3 years, trump will get 10!”
Posted on 12/12/18 at 11:34 am to tgrbaitn08
"How much time does he actually do?"
30 months
30 months
Posted on 12/12/18 at 11:36 am to TigerDoc
quote:
Speaking of Sean, one of the funnier parts of this ordeal was when Judge Wood forced Cohen to reveal Hannity as one of his 3 clients in open court.
I don’t give two shits about hannity, but one of the most unjust things about this investigation is that someone’s perfectly legal dealings that were totally irrelevant to the investigation was leaked to the public for no other reason except to smear them. How is that right?
Posted on 12/12/18 at 11:36 am to therick711
quote:
That's ridiculous. Mike Pence. Next question.
Pending...
Posted on 12/12/18 at 11:37 am to Jjdoc
36 months
... lucky he didn't flip on a Clinton.
Posted on 12/12/18 at 11:38 am to Jjdoc
So once again Muller strikes out, a key Trump confident either had nothing to offer, or failed to be persuaded to roll over on Trump, otherwise Cohen would be at home waiting to testify, not going to prison.
Posted on 12/12/18 at 11:40 am to EA6B
quote:
So once again Muller strikes out
Uhh....
Posted on 12/12/18 at 11:41 am to deSandman
quote:Wow. if he didn't say this he would have gotten 30 years...
Before the sentence was imposed, Cohen said he took "full responsibility" for the crimes, "for each act that I pled guilty to: The personal ones to me and those involving the President of the United States of America."
"My own weakness was blind loyalty to the man that caused me to choose the path of darkness," Cohen said. “Time and time again, I felt it was my duty to cover up his dirty deeds."
He was offered (like Corsi) to say this and that or he would get 30 years.
Now he gets 3 and lost his pardon.
Posted on 12/12/18 at 11:42 am to Tmcgin
That would be me, I voted for him, and I am better off.
Posted on 12/12/18 at 11:44 am to Tmcgin
quote:
Who gets personally involved with Trump and has been better off afterwards?
Americans.
quote:
I can come up with no one
Shocked
Posted on 12/12/18 at 11:47 am to The Pirate King
quote:
Without watching a single minute of tv coverage or reading a single article, I can guarantee you that the media narrative is: “OMG, if he’s getting 3 years, trump will get 10!”
weird flex, but ok
Posted on 12/12/18 at 11:48 am to Jbird
quote:
"This may seem hard to believe but today is one of the most meaningful days of my life," Cohen said, Bloomberg reported. "The irony is today is the day I get my freedom back. I have been leading a personal and mental incarceration ever since the fateful day that I accepted the offer to work for a famous real estate mogul whose business acumen I greatly admired."
By the way where is Manafort Podesta and Gates? Only one is in jail...
rut roh
even bigger rut roh
This post was edited on 12/12/18 at 11:51 am
Posted on 12/12/18 at 11:51 am to junkfunky
quote:
Here we go!!
Cohen: "Recently the president tweeted a statement calling me weak and it was correct but for a much different reason than he was implying. It was because time and time again i felt it was my duty to cover up his dirty deeds"
Posted on 12/12/18 at 11:52 am to Jjdoc
Amazing news. Enjoy prison Michael!!
Posted on 12/12/18 at 11:52 am to cajunangelle
Since 1966 there have been no successful criminal prosecutions under FARA and only 3 indictments returned or informations filed charging FARA violations. The three criminal cases post 1966 were: United States v. Park Tong-Sun (D.D.C. 1977), which was dismissed as part of a plea bargain; United States v. John P. McGoff (D.D.C. 1986), which the Department lost because of a statute of limitations problem; and United States v. Sam H. Zakhem, et al. (D. Colo. 1992), which was dismissed by the Government after the principal AUSA responsible for the case resigned. In addition, there have been 2 other grand jury investigations that did not result in criminal charges. One was a grand jury investigation in Chicago in the late 1970's into Government of Iran funding of massive pro-Shah demonstrations at the time of his state visit to then President Carter. At the conclusion of the investigation, a recommendation was made to proceed with an injunctive action, but that recommendation was rejected by the Assistant Attorney General. In the second, a grand jury in Connecticut developed information that became the basis for a civil consent decree against the advertising firm Young and Rubicam in 1992 for failing to report a fee splitting agreement with a Jamaican firm associated with a Jamaican Government official. By way of contrast, there have been 17 civil cases in that period, of which 10 were successfully litigated and 7 ended by consent decree. The number of administrative resolutions is much greater.
Popular
Back to top


0









