Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Colorado High School recites Pledge in Arabic. Heads explode. | Page 8 | Political Talk
Started By
Message

re: Colorado High School recites Pledge in Arabic. Heads explode.

Posted on 5/1/14 at 11:40 am to
Posted by Hawkeye95
Member since Dec 2013
20293 posts
Posted on 5/1/14 at 11:40 am to
quote:

Daniel Snyder has the right to name his football team whatever he wants to.

actually he doesn't have the right to name his football team whatever he wants. He couldn't call them the washington steelers or broncos. Also, the NFL would probably stop him from calling them the Fighting fricktards. Although the latter name might be appropriate for the skins.

quote:

Harry Reid is hoping to force him to change his name because it may be offensive to some people.

Harry Reid is not introducing legislation to get them to change their name. He is trying to use his influence to get them to change their name.
This post was edited on 5/1/14 at 11:41 am
Posted by Pettifogger
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Feb 2012
86790 posts
Posted on 5/1/14 at 11:41 am to
quote:

post Abraham.



So for the huge majority of documented history?
Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
53014 posts
Posted on 5/1/14 at 11:43 am to
quote:

But technically (and theologically) speaking, aren't Allah and the Christian God supposed to be the same entity?


Yes.


They differ in that Islam regards Jesus as a divinely inspired prophet.
Posted by SidewalkDawg
Chair
Member since Nov 2012
10252 posts
Posted on 5/1/14 at 11:46 am to
quote:

So for the huge majority of documented history?


Does it really matter what happens after? Or does it matter more that all originated with Abraham?

Look at it like a family tree with Abraham at the top. Below him it branches to Judaism, Christianity, and Islam.

All differ in their worship and practices, but to deny that they are founded on Abrahmic religious doctrine is to be dishonest.

edit: spelling
This post was edited on 5/1/14 at 11:48 am
Posted by Bunsbert Montcroff
Boise ID
Member since Jan 2008
5749 posts
Posted on 5/1/14 at 11:49 am to
quote:

Then ask them what that equates to. Not even remotely the same.

- Isaac (the son of Promise)
- Ishmael (the son of a Bondwoman)

in the islamic tradition, ishmael is the son who is nearly sacrificed. just an fyi.
Posted by Wolfhound45
Member since Nov 2009
127101 posts
Posted on 5/1/14 at 11:54 am to
quote:

in the islamic tradition, ishmael is the son who is nearly sacrificed. just an fyi.


And that is my point. I am well aware that in the Islamic tradition Ishmael replaces nearly all (if not all) references to Isaac. Hence the fallacy to equate them as the same. Not even remotely the same.
Posted by Pettifogger
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Feb 2012
86790 posts
Posted on 5/1/14 at 11:55 am to
quote:

All differ in their worship and practices, but to deny that they are founded on Abrahmic religious doctrine is to be dishonest.



I don't deny that at at all, nor have I indicated anything close to that in this thread. You're not showing me anything new with the concept you're trying to get across, that hasn't been in dispute.

The huge majority of advancement/evolution/spread of the Abrahamic religions, especially with regard to Christianity (post 300 AD) and Islam (post 600 AD) has occurred within the last 1500-1700 years. That's what, 2300+ years after Abraham?

These faiths have been on largely separate tracks for multiple millenia, with their very distinct religious texts, prayers, punishments, theories on governance, prophets, social values, cultural influences, etc. also advancing separately.

The point is not to deny a shared origin, the point is that the shared origin is largely irrelevant for the purpose it is used (which is to equate religions as being similar due to a "shared God").


Posted by Wolfhound45
Member since Nov 2009
127101 posts
Posted on 5/1/14 at 11:57 am to
quote:

All differ in their worship and practices, but to deny that they are founded on Abrahmic religious doctrine is to be dishonest.


No one denies that they all claim Abraham as a patriarch. That does not the claim of Christianity (I believe it is) or Islam (I believe it is not) true.
Posted by SidewalkDawg
Chair
Member since Nov 2012
10252 posts
Posted on 5/1/14 at 12:05 pm to
quote:

The point is not to deny a shared origin, the point is that the shared origin is largely irrelevant for the purpose it is used (which is to equate religions as being similar due to a "shared God").


Thanks, that clears up some of the confusion on shared origin.

However, I still can't see how you can claim they are 3 different deities, while I observe the same diety with 3 different interpretations.

Same Abrahamic God, 3 totally different interpretations of his teachings and prophets.
Posted by SidewalkDawg
Chair
Member since Nov 2012
10252 posts
Posted on 5/1/14 at 12:08 pm to
quote:

No one denies that they all claim Abraham as a patriarch. That does not the claim of Christianity (I believe it is) or Islam (I believe it is not) true.


Then by all means, go on believing what you will. But from someone who doesn't adhere to any of these three religions, your belief on the matter is a moot point.

The three religions all base their belief systems on the God of Abraham, whether one of these religions is the right way to worship that God is irrelevant to the fact that they all belief in the same God as Abraham, but differ on the interpretation of events.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
298305 posts
Posted on 5/1/14 at 12:10 pm to
quote:


Considering teachings about each can vary greatly for billions of people, I don't think distinctions are simply relevant for the individual.


Teachings vary greatly in every faith, or even denomination.
Posted by Pettifogger
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Feb 2012
86790 posts
Posted on 5/1/14 at 12:14 pm to
quote:

Teachings vary greatly in every faith, or even denomination.



Not disagreeing, but I think we can generally pull out teachings within denominations or faiths that are considered distinct from other faiths, and often, points of significant dispute/strife.
Posted by Spirit of Dunson
Member since Mar 2007
23112 posts
Posted on 5/1/14 at 12:18 pm to
quote:

Harry Reid
Damn. you talk about harry Reid more than he talks about the Koch bros!
Posted by Pettifogger
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Feb 2012
86790 posts
Posted on 5/1/14 at 12:19 pm to
quote:

However, I still can't see how you can claim they are 3 different deities, while I observe the same diety with 3 different interpretations.



Well if we're being honest, I believe there is one deity, and that the attributes I assign to him (through my religion) are accurate, and that those assigned to him by other faiths are invalid.

Thus, other Abrahamic faiths are worshipping/following a manifestation of God that doesn't exist, although admittedly there are some common themes in play and a shared historical origin.

It's like 200 years from now someone calling themselves an American, when their America may be radically different and inapposite of my own. We're both referencing the same country, but the concept isn't the same at all. We're each expressing our loyalty and devotion to separate conceptions of America. Now I consider God a reality, not a concept, but I'm sure you know what I'm getting at.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
81287 posts
Posted on 5/1/14 at 12:23 pm to
quote:

But technically (and theologically) speaking, aren't Allah and the Christian God supposed to be the same entity?


All 3 religions trace back to the Abrahamic God.
Posted by Spirit of Dunson
Member since Mar 2007
23112 posts
Posted on 5/1/14 at 12:23 pm to
So "one nation under the Abrahamic God"?
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
81287 posts
Posted on 5/1/14 at 12:24 pm to
quote:

But technically (and theologically) speaking, aren't Allah and the Christian God supposed to be the same entity?


All 3 religions trace back to the Abrahamic God.
Posted by Wolfhound45
Member since Nov 2009
127101 posts
Posted on 5/1/14 at 1:36 pm to
quote:

All 3 religions claim to trace back to the Abrahamic God.


FIFY

That is the key. Claim to (to include the belief system I adhere to - evangelical Chritianity).

- I believe one is true and a fuller relevation.
- I believe the other is a lie and a distortion.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
81287 posts
Posted on 5/2/14 at 7:19 pm to
We are saying the same thing.

That was a bullshite down-vote,
it is a historical fact that Judaism, Islam, and Christendom trace back to the Abrahamic God.
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 8Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram