- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Dershowitz thinks Lemon will skate
Posted on 1/31/26 at 3:26 pm to BamaGradinTn
Posted on 1/31/26 at 3:26 pm to BamaGradinTn
Evidence does show that. In his own words.
0
Posted on 1/31/26 at 3:29 pm to 3rdgentgr
Found the answer on Google
Yes, Don Lemon can be sued in civil court for his involvement in a January 2026 anti-ICE protest at a Minnesota church, following his federal indictment for conspiring to violate the religious freedom of worshippers. He faces charges including violating the FACE Act, which allows the DOJ to pursue civil penalties. [1, 2, 3, 4]
Key details regarding the potential for civil liability include:
Federal Charges: Lemon was indicted on federal charges, including conspiracy against rights (a law often used to protect constitutional rights) and violations of the FACE Act (Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances) for interfering with worshippers, which carries both criminal penalties and potential civil action. Civil Suit Potential: Beyond the federal criminal charges, the Department of Justice can initiate civil lawsuits under these statutes, and private individuals (the worshippers) could potentially file civil lawsuits for damages related to the interference with their rights. Context of Allegations: The charges arise from a Jan. 18, 2026, protest at Cities Church in St. Paul, MN, where a federal ICE official is a pastor. Defense Stance: While federal agents arrested Lemon in Los Angeles, his legal team has suggested the allegations are vague, and observers have questioned whether his actions constituted legitimate journalism rather than a criminal conspiracy. [1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
The case is currently in the initial court appearance phase, with Lemon released on bond. [3, 10, 11]
AI responses may include mistakes.
[1] LINK
[2] LINK
[3] LINK
[4] LINK
[5] LINK
[6] LINK
[7] LINK
[8] LINK
[9] LINK
[10] LINK
[11] LINK
Yes, Don Lemon can be sued in civil court for his involvement in a January 2026 anti-ICE protest at a Minnesota church, following his federal indictment for conspiring to violate the religious freedom of worshippers. He faces charges including violating the FACE Act, which allows the DOJ to pursue civil penalties. [1, 2, 3, 4]
Key details regarding the potential for civil liability include:
Federal Charges: Lemon was indicted on federal charges, including conspiracy against rights (a law often used to protect constitutional rights) and violations of the FACE Act (Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances) for interfering with worshippers, which carries both criminal penalties and potential civil action. Civil Suit Potential: Beyond the federal criminal charges, the Department of Justice can initiate civil lawsuits under these statutes, and private individuals (the worshippers) could potentially file civil lawsuits for damages related to the interference with their rights. Context of Allegations: The charges arise from a Jan. 18, 2026, protest at Cities Church in St. Paul, MN, where a federal ICE official is a pastor. Defense Stance: While federal agents arrested Lemon in Los Angeles, his legal team has suggested the allegations are vague, and observers have questioned whether his actions constituted legitimate journalism rather than a criminal conspiracy. [1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
The case is currently in the initial court appearance phase, with Lemon released on bond. [3, 10, 11]
AI responses may include mistakes.
[1] LINK
[2] LINK
[3] LINK
[4] LINK
[5] LINK
[6] LINK
[7] LINK
[8] LINK
[9] LINK
[10] LINK
[11] LINK
Yes, Don Lemon can be sued in civil court for his involvement in a January 2026 anti-ICE protest at a Minnesota church, following his federal indictment for conspiring to violate the religious freedom of worshippers. He faces charges including violating the FACE Act, which allows the DOJ to pursue civil penalties. [1, 2, 3, 4]
Key details regarding the potential for civil liability include:
Federal Charges: Lemon was indicted on federal charges, including conspiracy against rights (a law often used to protect constitutional rights) and violations of the FACE Act (Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances) for interfering with worshippers, which carries both criminal penalties and potential civil action. Civil Suit Potential: Beyond the federal criminal charges, the Department of Justice can initiate civil lawsuits under these statutes, and private individuals (the worshippers) could potentially file civil lawsuits for damages related to the interference with their rights. Context of Allegations: The charges arise from a Jan. 18, 2026, protest at Cities Church in St. Paul, MN, where a federal ICE official is a pastor. Defense Stance: While federal agents arrested Lemon in Los Angeles, his legal team has suggested the allegations are vague, and observers have questioned whether his actions constituted legitimate journalism rather than a criminal conspiracy. [1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
The case is currently in the initial court appearance phase, with Lemon released on bond. [3, 10, 11]
AI responses may include mistakes.
[1] LINK
[2] LINK
[3] LINK
[4] LINK
[5] LINK
[6] LINK
[7] LINK
[8] LINK
[9] LINK
[10] LINK
[11] LINK
Yes, Don Lemon can be sued in civil court for his involvement in a January 2026 anti-ICE protest at a Minnesota church, following his federal indictment for conspiring to violate the religious freedom of worshippers. He faces charges including violating the FACE Act, which allows the DOJ to pursue civil penalties. [1, 2, 3, 4]
Key details regarding the potential for civil liability include:
Federal Charges: Lemon was indicted on federal charges, including conspiracy against rights (a law often used to protect constitutional rights) and violations of the FACE Act (Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances) for interfering with worshippers, which carries both criminal penalties and potential civil action. Civil Suit Potential: Beyond the federal criminal charges, the Department of Justice can initiate civil lawsuits under these statutes, and private individuals (the worshippers) could potentially file civil lawsuits for damages related to the interference with their rights. Context of Allegations: The charges arise from a Jan. 18, 2026, protest at Cities Church in St. Paul, MN, where a federal ICE official is a pastor. Defense Stance: While federal agents arrested Lemon in Los Angeles, his legal team has suggested the allegations are vague, and observers have questioned whether his actions constituted legitimate journalism rather than a criminal conspiracy. [1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
The case is currently in the initial court appearance phase, with Lemon released on bond. [3, 10, 11]
AI responses may include mistakes.
[1] LINK
[2] LINK
[3] LINK
[4] LINK
[5] LINK
[6] LINK
[7] LINK
[8] LINK
[9] LINK
[10] LINK
[11] LINK
Posted on 1/31/26 at 3:29 pm to LChama
Anyone who has seen the video should know Lemon’s arrest is bullshite. He clearly was acting as journalist. Besides, Lemon would have no reason or incentive to act as a protester. It makes no sense in that context…
Posted on 1/31/26 at 3:31 pm to LChama
Of course he will. He's a fruity arse black man.
Posted on 1/31/26 at 3:36 pm to VOR
quote:
Anyone who has seen the video should know Lemon’s arrest is bullshite. He clearly was acting as journalist. Besides, Lemon would have no reason or incentive to act as a protester. It makes no sense in that context…
his acting as a journalist also intefered with the service, that is a crime
coordinating with the protesters makes him an accessory
lying about all of it makes him a giant piece of shite
Posted on 1/31/26 at 3:37 pm to LChama
He probably will. It's a weak case. Two judges wouldn't take it. I fear it makes him a cause celebre
Posted on 1/31/26 at 3:39 pm to SirWinston
quote:
He interviewed both the protesters and the church goers and was passably fair and respectful to both sides during those interviews.
He brought donuts and coffee to the invaders....that isnt fair.
After the fact he got in the church goers faces.
Posted on 1/31/26 at 3:54 pm to BHTiger
I despise him as much as the rest of you
BUT...
For the sake of the Nick Shirleys and James O'Keefes and Laura Loomers (some of the best weapons the right has to expose the evils of the left), it is a strategic mistake to charge Don Lemon in this instance.
The protection of journalists (even under the flimsy guise that Lemon tried to use) is more important to our side than it is to the left.
Don Lemon would have never been in MSP if not for the protected journalism right enjoyed by Nick Shirley.
BUT...
For the sake of the Nick Shirleys and James O'Keefes and Laura Loomers (some of the best weapons the right has to expose the evils of the left), it is a strategic mistake to charge Don Lemon in this instance.
The protection of journalists (even under the flimsy guise that Lemon tried to use) is more important to our side than it is to the left.
Don Lemon would have never been in MSP if not for the protected journalism right enjoyed by Nick Shirley.
This post was edited on 1/31/26 at 4:06 pm
Posted on 1/31/26 at 3:56 pm to LChama
Is he on the jury?
Posted on 1/31/26 at 3:59 pm to LChama
Tell him he can go free if his wife will vouch for him. 
Posted on 1/31/26 at 4:02 pm to LChama
Hes obviously a propagandists under the guise of a journalist but those credentials mifht be enough from criminal prosecution. I think there is more merit in a Civil lawsuit.
Posted on 1/31/26 at 4:04 pm to Ernaye
quote:
Hes obviously a propagandists under the guise of a journalist
The left would say the same about Shirley, O'Keefe, Loomer, Crowder.
This kind of journalism is absolutely vital to the right. It's far less vital to the left.
This post was edited on 1/31/26 at 4:05 pm
Posted on 1/31/26 at 4:05 pm to LChama
Maybe all of the others that went in will flip and say he got them to do it.
That'd be great.
That'd be great.
Posted on 1/31/26 at 4:07 pm to supatigah
quote:
his acting as a journalist also intefered with the service, that is a crime
I could easily see a scenario in which guerrilla journalism from our side inside of a mosque in Europe or America would be incredibly useful.
Posted on 1/31/26 at 4:09 pm to AlterEd
quote:
Dershowitz also just wrote a book detailing how Trump can run for POTUS again.
Anyone that supports him running for a 3rd term is a traitor.
Posted on 1/31/26 at 4:14 pm to SirWinston
quote:
I despise him as much as the rest of you
No you don't.
Imagine defending Lemon when he was clearly breaking the law
Posted on 1/31/26 at 4:17 pm to Powerman
Being a Journalist doesn’t hold up on Private property. This is a crime. Him laughing about pain being part of the process is going to not look good in court. The whole video is just damning legally
Posted on 1/31/26 at 4:18 pm to AlterEd
quote:
pretty sure he is even on video admitting that he coordinated with the protestors beforehand
I'm glad someone else saw that video. I've searched for it since, but he must have taken it down when the SHTF. It was a promo or teaser and he was giddy that he'd been invited to go along with some protesters, said they were going to do something "big."
He claimed he didn't know exactly what the plan was but said again that it was going to be "big" and told his viewers to be sure to watch the show.
He also said the group that invited him had recruited white protesters because they "needed white people for this," and he was very careful to say he was going as a journalist.
He's a terrible liar. His demeanor alone gave him away.
Posted on 1/31/26 at 4:30 pm to TigerTattle
Posted on 1/31/26 at 4:44 pm to AlterEd
quote:
he is even on video admitting that he coordinated with the protestors beforehand to determine which church they were going to, what time, etc. Meaning, he conspired with them to deprive those parishioners their first amendment rights.
Not only that, but he stated emphatically that the church had no idea they were coming and that it would be interesting to see how they react.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News