- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Forensic Audio Analysis confirms that there were 2 shooters
Posted on 7/22/24 at 3:16 pm to Chad504boy
Posted on 7/22/24 at 3:16 pm to Chad504boy
quote:
i have a few times. :crickets:
He’s getting bombarded with comments and questions, probably take a while. He got back with me a couple times early in the game, then it slowed down.
0
Posted on 7/22/24 at 3:17 pm to FreddieMac
Where is the audio from. Is it a stationary network type audio or from a cell phone?
Posted on 7/22/24 at 3:20 pm to Run DMC
2 shooters means they'd be using same caliber, same machined barrel. So 556. The better sniper might have tried to hit Trump in the head and turned, and then Red Dot virgin shot up the stands and took a bullet.
But then what sniper worth anything takes a headshot to begin with? Taking a headshot is extremely risky, even at such close range.
But then what sniper worth anything takes a headshot to begin with? Taking a headshot is extremely risky, even at such close range.
Posted on 7/22/24 at 3:30 pm to Midget Death Squad
quote:
Ohhhh. So the shooter was so incredibly accurate that he intentionally hit his ear? I love your logic here
WTF are you talking about. Who said that?
Posted on 7/22/24 at 3:30 pm to Smeg
quote:
Except the target (Trump's head) moved at the least millisecond.
Why didn't the other shooters get him?
Posted on 7/22/24 at 3:34 pm to Chad504boy
quote:I hope you have saved all of your analysis and vids etc.
Chad504boy
Posted on 7/22/24 at 3:39 pm to UtahGetMeTwo
quote:
But then what sniper worth anything takes a headshot to begin with? Taking a headshot is extremely risky, even at such close range.
Apparently Trump wears body armor.
Posted on 7/22/24 at 3:39 pm to AuburnTigers
its difficult and i'm getting to brick walls.
I have come to a new conclusion regarding the first shot.
iamjohnguy has it wrong. I am 10000% convinced the bullet was a deflection moving from right to left, not the whole left to right theory he bases all of his assumptions off of.
With this new evidence i've self discovered, I'm eliminating the 2nd floor window as the first shot sniper location. Can't be. Deflection does not line up. I'm pretty certain we can eliminate the water tower angle and deflection but look, i'm not 100% on this assumption.
The two angles that line up BEST isi Crooks' location or the window 1 on the bottom floor. I'm here for truth and discovery. I'm not trying to make up whack theories and conclusions for the sake of being a whacko.
My yellow arrow in right bleachers is the near approximate entry and direction the deflected bullet was heading. I circled the presumed possibilities of deflection area off that shot.
I have come to a new conclusion regarding the first shot.
iamjohnguy has it wrong. I am 10000% convinced the bullet was a deflection moving from right to left, not the whole left to right theory he bases all of his assumptions off of.
With this new evidence i've self discovered, I'm eliminating the 2nd floor window as the first shot sniper location. Can't be. Deflection does not line up. I'm pretty certain we can eliminate the water tower angle and deflection but look, i'm not 100% on this assumption.
The two angles that line up BEST isi Crooks' location or the window 1 on the bottom floor. I'm here for truth and discovery. I'm not trying to make up whack theories and conclusions for the sake of being a whacko.
My yellow arrow in right bleachers is the near approximate entry and direction the deflected bullet was heading. I circled the presumed possibilities of deflection area off that shot.
This post was edited on 7/22/24 at 3:43 pm
Posted on 7/22/24 at 4:02 pm to Chad504boy
How confident are you that there was a shot fired from the water tower?
That’s the one I haven’t been able to reconcile yet.
That’s the one I haven’t been able to reconcile yet.
This post was edited on 7/22/24 at 4:04 pm
Posted on 7/22/24 at 4:11 pm to Keltic Tiger
quote:
One of the few questions the SS Director answered was if they were sure there was only one shooter, she answered yes. FWIW
That’s probably the biggest piece of evidence that there was another shooter.
Posted on 7/22/24 at 4:17 pm to cadillacattack
quote:
How confident are you that there was a shot fired from the water tower?
That’s the one I haven’t been able to reconcile yet.
i'm extremely torn on shite. I'm still torn on who shot crooks. Tower sniper makes most sense to me. Not sure i'm buying a convenient detail on who they are telling us shot crooks.
its also super convenient that sniper location across field to tower is 488. i mean what the shite coincidence is that to one of the very first small nuggets of info that was thrown out there from a non biased source.
No crooks location matches 488 unless it was shot from the top of mazda dealership which is an unfathomable shot from the distance considering POV and blood splatter doesnt' really seem to match.
Posted on 7/22/24 at 4:19 pm to the808bass
quote:
That’s probably the biggest piece of evidence that there was another shooter.
and why are you going out your way to answer that question and not say its crooks...? i didn't listen to the BS Conference today cause i know that's a waste of time.
Posted on 7/22/24 at 6:11 pm to Snipe
The shot was on the money. The best president we've ever had just happened to turn his head at the precise moment the shot was taken.
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News