- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: If you're 5 feet from a car going 2 mph
Posted on 1/16/26 at 10:20 pm to Schleynole
Posted on 1/16/26 at 10:20 pm to Schleynole
If you have been dragged by a car once, and you were taught at an early age by parents to move, also at popo school 101 and you still flop in front of a moving car?
You need to change professions.gald you lived
You need to change professions.gald you lived
1
Posted on 1/16/26 at 10:24 pm to Schleynole
oh my god who fricking cares
Posted on 1/16/26 at 10:25 pm to Schleynole
How does he know she wasn’t going to floor it or that he might slip on the ice - arm chair QB.
Posted on 1/16/26 at 10:26 pm to PurpleCrush
quote:
taught at an early age by parents to move, also at popo school 101
His job wasn't to move. Her job was to stop.
That's the first thing you have to understand.
Posted on 1/16/26 at 10:30 pm to Schleynole
So this is like the 4th stage of TDS grief when you realize all your BS was just that and this was a justifiable shoot.
You just hold your wiener and post sniveling bitter questions.
Got it.
You’re pretty late to the party at this point. Others here have already beat this to death when they thought they actually had a chance of fooling the general public
Don’t worry there will be something new this week for you to clutch your pearls and your wiener over
You just hold your wiener and post sniveling bitter questions.
Got it.
You’re pretty late to the party at this point. Others here have already beat this to death when they thought they actually had a chance of fooling the general public
Don’t worry there will be something new this week for you to clutch your pearls and your wiener over
This post was edited on 1/16/26 at 10:31 pm
Posted on 1/16/26 at 10:36 pm to Schleynole
If your sole purpose was to dodge the vehicle b/c you anticipated it moving forward at 2mph then yes. In this case his perception when he shot was that she was moving faster, or mashing the pedal.
I think he was caught up in taking the video with his phone b/c they weren't necessarily threatening but a nuisance or impeding to what they were doing probably much longer than 3.5 minutes. His goal with the phone recording I believe was to get info on the car and occupants.
In this case I don't think he anticipated the car moving forward with him in front and when he realized it was it was too late to save her. The question to ask is, when he reached for the gun why do that instead of run left knowing she was going right, but the key factor is he had no way to know which direction she was about to go b/c he was too close. And that's coupled with there was nothing in their behavior indicating she was about to take off with him in front.
I think he was caught up in taking the video with his phone b/c they weren't necessarily threatening but a nuisance or impeding to what they were doing probably much longer than 3.5 minutes. His goal with the phone recording I believe was to get info on the car and occupants.
In this case I don't think he anticipated the car moving forward with him in front and when he realized it was it was too late to save her. The question to ask is, when he reached for the gun why do that instead of run left knowing she was going right, but the key factor is he had no way to know which direction she was about to go b/c he was too close. And that's coupled with there was nothing in their behavior indicating she was about to take off with him in front.
Posted on 1/16/26 at 11:26 pm to Smeg
His training was to move, she tried to avoid him
Both can be true. Sad it went down like that.
Both can be true. Sad it went down like that.
Posted on 1/16/26 at 11:35 pm to Schleynole
It was going 2mph because the wheels spun due to ice on the road. Now imagine if it was just asphalt.
Posted on 1/16/26 at 11:48 pm to Schleynole
I see where you are going with you leading question.
You are a disingenuous passive aggressive pussy making excuses for people obstructing law enforcement while they are legally, lawfully executing their job.
GO frick YOURSELF LIBERAL CUCK!!
You are a disingenuous passive aggressive pussy making excuses for people obstructing law enforcement while they are legally, lawfully executing their job.
GO frick YOURSELF LIBERAL CUCK!!
Posted on 1/16/26 at 11:53 pm to Schleynole
quote:
If you're 5 feet from a car going 2 mph Do you think you could move out of the way before getting run over?
Your premise isn’t completely factual in this case including leaving out road conditions with tire spinning and people slipping and leaving out acceleration of vehicle with tire already spinning once it gains full traction along with passenger side tire (including the vehicle jumping forward), but let’s play the game.
If you're the driver of a car 5 feet from a person while going 2 mph do you think you could stop before hitting the person with your car?
If you're the driver of a car 5 feet from a person while going 2 mph do you think you could turn to the right sharply enough to avoid hitting that person? If not why would you continue driving towards the person?
If you're the driver of a car 5 feet from a person do you think you could follow the legal instructions of a law enforcement officer at your window arresting you for obstruction and not flee in the first place while hitting the ICE officer?
This post was edited on 1/17/26 at 7:07 am
Posted on 1/17/26 at 12:07 am to MasterDigger
quote:
If you're driving a car going 2 mph and are 5 feet from a pedestrian...
Do you think you could hit the brakes to avoid hitting that pedestrian
Exactly stated.
There is also a massive ignorance of physics by these leftists. Both into the transferred force, and relative speeds.
I thought they only sucked at biology, but it seems those who think men are women cant do physics either.
Posted on 1/17/26 at 3:45 am to Schleynole
According to where YOU were educated.
By the shining example, you would be a hood ornament.
By the shining example, you would be a hood ornament.
Posted on 1/17/26 at 3:56 am to Schleynole
Fantastic argument to run over protestors.
Posted on 1/17/26 at 4:03 am to Schleynole
If you had a functioning brain do you think you could make it in society?
Posted on 1/17/26 at 4:33 am to Schleynole
Depends on the weather.
Posted on 1/17/26 at 4:47 am to Schleynole
quote:
Do you think you could move out of the way before getting run over?
I also might be able to avoid a swing at my neck by a crazy with a machete, but it's still attempted murder and I am more than allowed to defend myself.
Bad murder analogy on your part.
Posted on 1/17/26 at 4:49 am to Tigahs24Seven
What has never been released is sound of the engine idle. If it was high, speed/movement is irrelevant...
Posted on 1/17/26 at 6:58 am to Schleynole
Do you see it coming slow rolling your way or a quick acceleration?
This post was edited on 1/17/26 at 6:59 am
Page 4 of 5
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News