- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Impressive support for Intelligent Design
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:24 pm to northshorebamaman
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:24 pm to northshorebamaman
quote:
Without you being more specific, I have to ask, do you think that is meant to represent a straight line (ie "men came from monkeys")?
Be it straight or be it crooked... it doesn't work.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:25 pm to northshorebamaman
quote:
Without you being more specific, I have to ask, do you think that is meant to represent a straight line (ie "men came from monkeys")?
The Sumerians pretty much straight up tell us where we came from. We are the result of a genetics program that lasted quite awhile and had several failures, which resulted in worldwide calamities.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:29 pm to AlterEd
I've never trusted the Sumerians.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:30 pm to SallysHuman
quote:And it's not straight or crooked.
Be it straight or be it crooked
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:32 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
None of this supports intelligent design.
What about this?
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:33 pm to northshorebamaman
quote:
And it's not straight or crooked.
So, it's branched.
Still doesn't work.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:34 pm to BOHICAMAN
quote:
Our brains are fancy radios.
What's crazy is that a lot of stuff that we consider to be "real" is just interpretations that out brains make from outside stimuli. Take "sound" to be an example. Sound doesn't actually exist. It's just vibrations in the air that are brains interprets as one.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:38 pm to SallysHuman
quote:I agree. The graphic you posted is a poor attempt to visually represent evolution and has been widely used to misrepresent evolution as "men coming from monkeys." Luckily the theory isn't derived from that picture.
So, it's branched.
Still doesn't work.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:39 pm to Mo Jeaux
quote:
What do you mean by this?
I can’t be any more literal. Good luck with an evolutionary mind set where two reproductive compatible beings evolve at the same scientific impossibility of a time line over a billion plus years. Within 30/40 years of each or so anyway.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:54 pm to TexasForever81
You don’t understand evolutionary theory. It’s not me who needs the good luck. Most of you are tilting at windmills. You don’t even understand what you’re arguing against. Look no further than Sally’s Human on this page who thinks that evolution proposes that we came from monkeys.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:55 pm to northshorebamaman
quote:
The graphic you posted is a poor attempt to visually represent evolution and has been widely used to misrepresent evolution as "men coming from monkeys." Luckily the theory isn't derived from that picture.
I picked a graphic.
You pick a graphic. Still doesn't work.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:57 pm to SallysHuman
quote:
I picked a graphic.
You pick a graphic. Still doesn't work.
Because that’s not what the theory says. Just like TexasForever, you’re tilting at windmills.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 10:08 pm to SallysHuman
quote:
I picked a graphic.
The graphic you chose suggests you believe the theory of evolution claims men came from monkeys. Forgive me if that's incorrect but you haven't given me anything else to work with.
quote:Why doesn't this one work? Please be somewhat more specific. "It doesn't work" isn't an argument.
You pick a graphic. Still doesn't work.
(you can right click and zoom in)
Posted on 2/20/26 at 10:10 pm to Mo Jeaux
Mo Jeaux
One of us wrong about how we got here. If I’m wrong, you and I will never know. If you’re wrong, we will.
Enjoy the weekend. We don’t get enough of one.
One of us wrong about how we got here. If I’m wrong, you and I will never know. If you’re wrong, we will.
Enjoy the weekend. We don’t get enough of one.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 10:18 pm to TexasForever81
quote:The fact that the theory of evolution makes no claims about how we got here either way suggests you're wrong on the specific topic of evolution, at minimum.
One of us wrong about how we got here. If I’m wrong,
Posted on 2/20/26 at 10:26 pm to northshorebamaman
quote:
you can right click and zoom in)
Thank you for the graphic.
I find it interesting it replicates, in a way, the 3-6 day of creation, in order.
quote:
The graphic you chose suggests you believe the theory of evolution claims men came from monkeys.
No, not quite, I do understand the common ancestor claim.
quote:
Why doesn't this one work? Please be somewhat more specific. "It doesn't work" isn't an argument.
Honestly.. it's hard to read. Also, it shows branches but not roots. I could be reading it wrong, I'm three glasses in and that's my first exposure to the chart.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 10:35 pm to SallysHuman
quote:I'm not interested in disputing religion and come from a deeply religious family full of good people, so I'm happy if you can find parallels that help make evolution more compatible with your faith, whatever that may be.
I find it interesting it replicates, in a way, the 3-6 day of creation, in order.
quote:Like I said, the posting of that graphic suggests belief in the "man from monkeys" bastardization of the theory popular with creationist. I'm glad that isn't the case.
No, not quite, I do understand the common ancestor claim.
quote:No worries. Hopefully it sparks further interest for you. There are plenty of other good examples online.
Honestly.. it's hard to read. Also, it shows branches but not roots. I could be reading it wrong, I'm three glasses in and that's my first exposure to the chart.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 10:44 pm to northshorebamaman
quote:
Like I said, the posting of that graphic suggests belief in the "man from monkeys" bastardization of the theory popular with creationist. I'm glad that isn't the case.
It is a common style graphic. Not just among ID people. Where did such graphs originate? I hunted a descent friendly graphic and that's what google spit out.
quote:
I'm happy if you can find parallels that help make evolution more compatible with your faith, whatever that may be.
Evolution is not compatible with my faith. Adaptation is, but not macro evolution. I did not slink from the slop... I descended from that which was "fearfully and wonderfully made". So did you.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 10:45 pm to RebelExpress38
Who designed the designer?
Popular
Back to top



2





