- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 10/28/20 at 8:07 pm to Lynyrd
quote:
When social media decides what their members see and what they don't, they, in essence, become a publisher
Chicken deciders what we see and don’t see. LucasP posted really lackluster porn and as a result isn’t here any longer giving elguacho a run for his money. Chickens forum, Chickens rules. Is he publishing what you and I post? Should the government step in and regulate him?
This post was edited on 10/28/20 at 8:08 pm
Posted on 10/28/20 at 8:08 pm to Iron Lion
quote:
Why is this so difficult for people to understand?
He understands.
Posted on 10/28/20 at 8:09 pm to BoarEd
quote:
Do you not understand the words that poster typed out? What do you mean 'what?'
It’s not the words, it’s the idea that doesn’t make sense given the law.
Posted on 10/28/20 at 8:09 pm to Lynyrd
quote:
It's not about big/small. It's about 203 status. Cnn had to pay Nick Sandman millions because they are considered a publisher. Social media is, currently, exempt from lawsuits, because they allow open discussions. When social media decides what their members see and what they don't, they, in essence, become a publisher.They should lose their 203 exemption status. Eta:spelling
They already know this. They're just feigning ignorance. And in David's case doubling down on ignorance by claiming this would lead to "big government" when it would do nothing of the sort.
Posted on 10/28/20 at 8:11 pm to DavidTheGnome
quote:
So do we want a bug gov telling people what they have to publish?
So you admit they are a publisher. We have common ground.
Now lets take away their special exemptions that a platform provider has.
Posted on 10/28/20 at 8:11 pm to Keltic Tiger
quote:
Yet Silicone Valley is so deeply embedded int Wash. D.C. that even some Republicans are dragging their feet in this investigations.
Dragging their feet on regulating how pvt biz conducts biz?
Posted on 10/28/20 at 8:14 pm to Sid E Walker
quote:
Scorched earth after Trump wins. Take no prisoners...end them.
Absolutely.
I do believe Trump is saving our country.
Posted on 10/28/20 at 8:15 pm to TailbackU
/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/65548907/1149362482.jpg.0.jpg)
Why would anyone conclude he’s a leftist?!
Posted on 10/28/20 at 8:16 pm to BigLSUNut
quote:
So you admit they are a publisher. We have common ground.
Now lets take away their special exemptions that a platform provider has.
They’ve always been publishers of your posts/tweets. There is no publisher/platform distinction in statute or jurisprudence. If you take away 230 protection social media, comment sections disappear...which, arguably, would be good for individual psyches and the republic.
This post was edited on 10/28/20 at 8:17 pm
Posted on 10/28/20 at 8:16 pm to BoarEd
quote:
would lead to "big government" when it would do nothing of the sort.
Posted on 10/28/20 at 8:16 pm to DavidTheGnome
I would wager he didn't come up with it, just like frickface didn't come up with Facebook. It's just too convenient that FB tracks all your information and locations,and Twitter is distribution of biased information.
These are CIA black hat programs.
These are CIA black hat programs.
Posted on 10/28/20 at 8:17 pm to DavidTheGnome
quote:
lackluster porn
Porn is against the rules and no one here had to sign a term of agreement. It's known. Don't post porn.
quote:
Is he publishing what you and I post?
How dumb are you? It violates the terms of this website. Yes, he blocks porn. So? It's a sports/news site and against the rules.
Twitter blocked the 4th largest newspaper's publication because it will hurt Biden.
Sorry, Chicken blocked porn. He's wasn't blocking news.
Posted on 10/28/20 at 8:19 pm to DavidTheGnome
quote:
DavidTheGnome
You are so fricking dense it’s not even funny.
Your brain is all mushy I bet from spending all that time on Reddit.
Posted on 10/28/20 at 8:29 pm to Lynyrd
quote:
How dumb are you? It violates the terms of this website. Yes, he blocks porn. So? It's a sports/news site and against the rules.
Twitter blocked the 4th largest newspaper's publication because it will hurt Biden.
Sorry, Chicken blocked porn. He's wasn't blocking news.
TD blocks, deletes and bans posters for much more than porn. If 230 goes away TD would be subject to myriad lawsuits from banned posters, defamation and libel suits because of what retards post. The internet exists today because of 230. Delete it and it goes back to shopping and media websites with no access for the bums of TD to be heard.
Posted on 10/28/20 at 8:30 pm to TailbackU
He is the single greatest threat to free speech in this country. He should be called Rasputin and treated as such.
Posted on 10/28/20 at 8:36 pm to TailbackU
Wow. Cancel culture is real.
Posted on 10/28/20 at 8:39 pm to Lynyrd
quote:
Cnn had to pay Nick Sandman millions because they are considered a publisher.
CNN is indeed a publisher, but they didn’t pay sandman millions, or a million.
Posted on 10/28/20 at 8:44 pm to cwill
quote:
CNN is indeed a publisher, but they didn’t pay sandman millions, or a million.
How much did they pay him? (honest question, I never heard/read)
Posted on 10/28/20 at 8:50 pm to cwill
quote:
What law obligates a pvt company to allow you to use its service to say or do whatever you want while accessing their website?
These companies are the public square. Maybe they should have thought of that before starting their websites and censoring the voices of only one political party that just so happens to differ from their political beliefs.
Not once have I heard them say that they have the right to censor based on political ideology. They have only repeatedly lied and said that they do not censor the right.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News