- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 7/25/18 at 5:38 pm to nugget
Kaitlin Conners and Stormy Daniels star in blacked!
Posted on 7/25/18 at 5:41 pm to nugget
Posted on 7/25/18 at 5:43 pm to el Gaucho
quote:
She looks like Ashton Kutcher from that 70s show
Good chance that's why Cappercuck thinks she's hot... cause she looks like a dude.
Posted on 7/25/18 at 6:01 pm to nugget
quote:
Kaitlin Conners from CNN gets blacked from White House
Michael and Barry moved from the White House a year and a half ago. Who blacked Kaitlin?
Posted on 7/25/18 at 6:02 pm to Btrtigerfan
quote:
She has Nick Saban as her background photo on Twitter. Just so you can judge her appropriately.
Many have made deals with Satan for their success.
Posted on 7/25/18 at 6:03 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
And yet Acosta still gets in the door?
Comic relief. That's all.
Posted on 7/25/18 at 6:03 pm to PsychTiger
They keep showing her “asking questions” aka yelling them across the room or a lawn...odds he just wasn’t listening?
Posted on 7/25/18 at 6:06 pm to nugget
I didn't think any blacks were left?
Heheheheh
Heheheheh
Posted on 7/25/18 at 11:48 pm to goatmilker
Can Facebook just block people? Are they now a govenmnet agency?
Posted on 7/26/18 at 9:39 am to Navajo61490
quote:
They keep showing her “asking questions” aka yelling them across the room or a lawn
She and the other "reporters" have been rudely shouting inappropriate questions at President Trump after he meets with a world leader and has a news conference afterwards to tell everyone what they agreed to and to allow "reporters" to ask questions relating to the meeting.
Instead of asking a relevant question regarding the meeting, she had the nerve to disrupt the proceedings by shouting a question that had nothing to do with the meeting between the two world leaders.
She and the other MSM presstitutes are now whinning that other "reporters" did the same thing as she did and they weren't barred.
Well, just because the other kids are behaving rudely and inappropriately that doesn't mean she should behave rudely and inappropriately.
I say use her as an example to let the the other "reporters" know that they should only be asking a question that relates to the subject matter of the meeting that just took place.
Besides, we all know that the MSM presstitutes are deliberately asking inappropriate questions to try to embarrass President Trump in front of the world leaders.
I'm glad President Trump did what he did.
This post was edited on 7/26/18 at 9:49 am
Posted on 7/26/18 at 9:46 am to DawgfaninCa
quote:
I'm glad President Trump did what he did
Exactly. It's like these people have no clue that their actions have consequences. What pissed me off was Fox New issuing a statement in support of that ignorant girl.
Posted on 7/26/18 at 9:48 am to nugget
quote:
Kaitlin Conners....gets blacked
***spins gravel rushing to pr0nhub***
***is disappoint***
Posted on 7/26/18 at 9:49 am to TbirdSpur2010
Posted on 7/26/18 at 9:50 am to nugget
quote:
What pissed me off was Fox New issuing a statement in support of that ignorant girl.
Journalism (if you wanna call it that these days) is a big fraternity. They watch out for each over these types of things....
Not that I agree with it. Because starting tomorrow, Fox will go back to bashing the alphabet media companies of their coverage again anyways.
Posted on 7/26/18 at 10:44 am to CapperVin
quote:So, you're into trannies eh?
She is so hot
To each his own.
Posted on 7/26/18 at 10:50 am to nugget
I used to attend some local and state political press conferences. Most of them were "feel good" stories. E.g. new company expansion, recognizing a local citizen for an act of heroism.
I probably went to 20-30 of these over a period of 5 years. Only once did the press ask a question to the politician related to the item at hand. Once. And it was from a smaller news junket that was actually there to report on the story, not get a quote on a completely different item that was to be taken out of context.
Here you've got a guest on the platform announcing 300 new jobs in the community, and no member of the media wants to ask them why they chose their city. They all want to shout over each other and ask "WHY DID YOU VOTE AGAINST THE CHILDREN?!?"
I probably went to 20-30 of these over a period of 5 years. Only once did the press ask a question to the politician related to the item at hand. Once. And it was from a smaller news junket that was actually there to report on the story, not get a quote on a completely different item that was to be taken out of context.
Here you've got a guest on the platform announcing 300 new jobs in the community, and no member of the media wants to ask them why they chose their city. They all want to shout over each other and ask "WHY DID YOU VOTE AGAINST THE CHILDREN?!?"
Posted on 7/26/18 at 11:32 am to Golfer
quote:
I used to attend some local and state political press conferences. Most of them were "feel good" stories. E.g. new company expansion, recognizing a local citizen for an act of heroism.
I probably went to 20-30 of these over a period of 5 years. Only once did the press ask a question to the politician related to the item at hand. Once. And it was from a smaller news junket that was actually there to report on the story, not get a quote on a completely different item that was to be taken out of context.
I have attended a lot (and I mean a lot) of SF Arts Commission meetings and SF Sunshine Ordinance Task Force meetings and every time a member of the public speaks under Public Comment for a specific item that is on the agenda, the speaker is supposed to limit their comment to the item on the agenda.
However, 99% of the speakers ramble on about something else that is bothering them but not the item on the agenda.
The Arts Commissioners and the Task Force members always let the speaker ramble on about nonsense for the 3 minutes they are allotted to comment on the item on the agenda because they don't want to create a scene by telling the speaker either to limit their public comment to the item on the agenda or to sit down if they aren't going to comment about the item on the agenda.
The rest of us who are going to limit our comments to the item on the agenda have to waste our time listening to all of their irrelevant public comments because the Progressives on the Arts Commission and the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force don't want to have to be the bad guys who enforce the rules.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News