- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 1/23/26 at 9:03 pm to Ailsa
The next domino to drop: Pam Bondi will soon release a strongly worded statement!
Posted on 1/23/26 at 9:11 pm to blueboy
quote:
Shouldn't he be arresting them instead?
Ooof.
The big question that's not being discussed. TIL NOW.
Merely "OUSTED"? How are "high-ranking officials" who weaponized the bureau against President Trump just..."ousted"? Pretty serious crime, no?Why no indictments, arrests or scheduled trials?
So are they even real or just fictional characters?
Lol -- this admin. Totally impotent.
Posted on 1/23/26 at 9:14 pm to davyjones
quote:
You are surely aware that sometimes there are things or actions that are certainly fireable offenses, perhaps some other “hurtful” consequences like forfeiting retirement/pension etc, yet may not necessarily be criminal offenses.
This doesn't sound "criminal" to you?
BREAKING: FBI Director has just OUSTED high-ranking officials at the FBI who were found to have weaponized the bureau against President Trump.
quote:
I can’t imagine this being too complicated or complex a concept for folks to sort through in their minds.
Posted on 1/23/26 at 9:15 pm to EphesianArmor
Right? frick that guy. Condescending a-hole. And then the nerve to be like, "my friend" afterwards.
He's becoming just like SFP in real time. Paid shills.
He's becoming just like SFP in real time. Paid shills.
Posted on 1/23/26 at 9:19 pm to burke985
quote:
Annnnnd nothing will happen to them
There's not even a shred of proof a "them" exists.
This "BULLETIN!!" announcement is designed to take some heat off of Kash and Trump for scoring an official 0.0 on their criminal arrest record of "high officials" thus far.
Posted on 1/23/26 at 9:20 pm to EphesianArmor
Maybe them are actually the aliens!
Posted on 1/23/26 at 9:22 pm to Powerman
We know powerbottom wants to see the videos
Posted on 1/23/26 at 9:23 pm to Toomer Deplorable
quote:
The next domino to drop: Pam Bondi will soon release a strongly worded statement!
I cant disagree
Posted on 1/23/26 at 9:24 pm to Toomer Deplorable
quote:
The next domino to drop: Pam Bondi will soon release a strongly worded statement!
She's not even good at that.
But we should expect another Binder hoax somehow and yet one more speech on being "sick and tired" of the rampant "antisemitism in America" -- because THAT'S what Americans are really concerned about.
Posted on 1/23/26 at 9:25 pm to EphesianArmor
Who was the FBI agent in charge in New Orleans that was ousted? Mitch must have put him in.
Posted on 1/23/26 at 9:26 pm to davyjones
quote:When you violate it by using the FBI to falsely charge and arrest a former president, yes it absolutely does.
the Hatch Act doesn’t involve criminal arrests
Otherwise, it's just meaningless finger-wagging bullshite. They'll go work for some firm somewhere making more money while they wait to get rehired by democrats.
Posted on 1/23/26 at 9:26 pm to Powerman
The pedophiles with the most to lose also know they were sanitized and poisoned. That's why it took them this many years to ask for them.
Posted on 1/23/26 at 9:27 pm to SDVTiger
quote:
Kash me outside how bout dat
Sure.
Here's what both you and he have earned for your shenanigans:
Posted on 1/23/26 at 9:31 pm to SDVTiger
quote:
Kash me outside how bout dat
I see what you did there.
\
Posted on 1/23/26 at 9:41 pm to SuperSaint
quote:
Release
The
Files
Posted on 1/23/26 at 9:57 pm to blueboy
quote:
When you violate it by using the FBI to falsely charge and arrest a former president, yes it absolutely does.
No, it’s not. There could be an “offshoot” of a Hatch Act investigation that leads to a criminal investigation/indictment/prosecution, but again, that would be in the situation of discovering a separate criminal act while in the process of an administrative Hatch Act proceeding.
For instance, bribery. If bribery were found to have been committed while investigating a specific act of wrongdoing as defined by the Hatch Act, then that would become a separate (even if f still factually related) criminal matter. Hence, we’re back to square one with my original question of which specific federal criminal statute are y’all demanding be brought before a grand jury to seek a criminal indictment??
Here’s the point of my inquisitiveness and “push back” in this particular regard: you can’t validly and legitimately demand something be done when you don’t even know if what you’re demanding is an actual thing. I see all these denouncements of the Trump DOJ for failing to arrest for this and failing to arrest for that, and in more than a few instances wherein a judgment of epic failure has been giddily pronounced by some amongst us, when the original demand for a specific action was blatantly unrealistic and frankly silly in the first place.
I’m not saying that’s the situation in every instance, because yes of course there are going to be legit cases/instances wherein criminal action could be justifiably possible, yet pursuant to prosecutorial discretion a choice to not actively pursue is made for any number of reasons, but hot damn you gotta know what you’re demanding and whether it’s an actual thing before you go off half-cocked trashing them for some inaction that wasn’t a rational demand in the first place.
**Is that a long arse post? Hell yes it is. It’s crazy. I’m crazy. I’m an old school long typer. Whatcha gonna do, ya know?
This post was edited on 1/23/26 at 10:02 pm
Posted on 1/23/26 at 9:58 pm to EphesianArmor
@ifindretards we found another one
Posted on 1/23/26 at 10:04 pm to davyjones
quote:But there wasn't, so today was just more bullshite with no consequences. Thanks.
There could be an “offshoot” of a Hatch Act investigation that leads to a criminal investigation/indictment/prosecution
quote:Falsely charging and arresting a former president? Yeah, that's a 'thing.'
whether it’s an actual thing
Posted on 1/23/26 at 10:09 pm to MrLSU
Be interesting to follow up and trace (straight back to Central Casting)
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News