Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Kyle Rittenhouse Trial - Day 7 | Page 106 | Political Talk
Started By
Message

re: Kyle Rittenhouse Trial - Day 7

Posted on 11/10/21 at 8:22 pm to
Posted by omarlittle
Member since Mar 2011
1334 posts
Posted on 11/10/21 at 8:22 pm to
quote:

His rifle was the IDEAL weapon for this application


Yep. I’d say it worked out pretty good for him.
Posted by Bourre
Da Parish
Member since Nov 2012
23591 posts
Posted on 11/10/21 at 8:24 pm to
I watched on the Rekieta Law stream and one of them mentioned that someone in the courtroom said the jury looked disinterested, arms crossed, and not taking notes during Kyle’s cross examination. The point they made was why object when nothing being said is hurting Kyle and objecting would only draw attention from the jury to trivial matters.

They also mentioned that the defense attorney had a history of being someone who didn’t object a lot in previous cases so this is his normal style
This post was edited on 11/10/21 at 8:26 pm
Posted by BuckyCheese
Member since Jan 2015
57778 posts
Posted on 11/10/21 at 8:26 pm to
quote:

His rifle was the IDEAL weapon for this application. When facing a potential mob swarm, those 30 rounds come in handy. He fired 7 or 8 rounds that night. A pocket carry pistol or revolver would have left him completely undefended as he made his way to the police. He likely misses several times with a pistol as well, making the extra rounds invaluable.


For quantity of ammo, yes. However in all three instances the aggressor was within a few feet of him. Very close quarters for a rifle.

Probably why Unicep get his bicep vaporized instead of one in the chest.
Posted by PlanoPrivateer
Frisco, TX
Member since Jan 2004
2939 posts
Posted on 11/10/21 at 8:27 pm to
quote:

A pistol would have been far better in the situations Kyle was in.
I don't know if it is correct or not but Kyle said by law he was too young to own a pistol in Wisconsin but was old enough to own a rifle. I think the judge will address this law when he charges the jury. We will see.
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
35577 posts
Posted on 11/10/21 at 8:28 pm to
quote:

The only thing I can see is that the defense didn’t want to over object and appear to be antagonists. The prosecutor was coming off like a real arse and they were content to allow him to continue that.

They obviously had tremendous faith in their witness.

Yeah those are my immediate gut thoughts on the subject as well, pretty much verbatim. Prosecutor was going out of his way to come across as abrasive, condescending, arrogant and even mean spirited in general. Which jurors find especially loathsome. And Rittenhouse appeared extremely well prepared for the cross examination, which of course includes preparation for the ugliest possible topics that could and likely would come out, the likely manner in which they would be directed at him, and how to react. I was pretty impressed with the execution of the entire situation.
Posted by Trevaylin
south texas
Member since Feb 2019
10268 posts
Posted on 11/10/21 at 8:28 pm to


the da sees he has no chance at conviction

the da best result at this time is mistrial. . Let some other da resolve the mess

the da worst result at this time is mistrial with prejudice, Kyle is free. I'll bet the feds step in at this point
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
35577 posts
Posted on 11/10/21 at 8:30 pm to
I completely agree with those takes. No doubt.
Posted by BuckyCheese
Member since Jan 2015
57778 posts
Posted on 11/10/21 at 8:30 pm to
quote:

I can't tell if the ADA is more retarded than corrupt, or the other way around. It's probably the biggest remaining determination to be made in the whole trial.


He's a dem, has a goofy hairstyle and has a very condescending and patronizing voice.

I'm leaning corrupt.

The likelihood of communications with leftist groups that they would not want publicized being on Unicep's phone is pretty high. I'm assuming that was behind the refusal to serve the warrant.
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
87369 posts
Posted on 11/10/21 at 8:31 pm to
quote:

don't know if it is correct or not but Kyle said by law he was too young to own a pistol in Wisconsin but was old enough to own a rifle. I think the judge will address this law when he charges the jury. We will see.


I remember saying this from the beginning. He was old enough to carry a rifle. It’s crazy how I easily looked up state gun laws yet people would consistently just make up what they thought the law was. Why has our society come to this? The info is readily available to you.

Posted by RockyMtnTigerWDE
War Damn Eagle Dad!
Member since Oct 2010
108480 posts
Posted on 11/10/21 at 8:31 pm to
quote:

mmcgrath


I believe you to be severely mentally handicapped.
Posted by BuckyCheese
Member since Jan 2015
57778 posts
Posted on 11/10/21 at 8:32 pm to
quote:

I don't know if it is correct or not but Kyle said by law he was too young to own a pistol in Wisconsin but was old enough to own a rifle. I think the judge will address this law when he charges the jury. We will see.



I understand that.

Was simply pointing out that AR's are carried for deterrence generally. Pistols are not.
Posted by CAD703X
Liberty Island
Member since Jul 2008
92441 posts
Posted on 11/10/21 at 8:36 pm to
Honestly when an older baw walks into a diner where I'm having breakfast with a sidearm in a holster I sit up a little straighter and think that guy isn't going to put up with any nonsense.

So I'd say the deterrent factor is pretty much spot on.
Posted by BobBoucher
Member since Jan 2008
18594 posts
Posted on 11/10/21 at 8:38 pm to
quote:

So I'd say the deterrent factor is pretty much spot on.


For people who possess common sense. I mean, for most of us, simply possessing a rifle is a deterrent. Why would you do anything that could be perceived as a threat to someone with a gun????!

People are afraid to debate this because it could be seen as arguing “he deserved to die” for just being stupid.

This post was edited on 11/10/21 at 8:41 pm
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
46949 posts
Posted on 11/10/21 at 8:39 pm to
Perhaps, but the rifles open presence serves as a deterrent and allows you to neutralize a threat in close quarters without allowing that threat to get too close, with a high level of accuracy. This is why riot police carry them. That said, they wear side arms too.
ETA. He also testified that he wasn’t old enough to carry a pistol under WI law.
This post was edited on 11/10/21 at 8:42 pm
Posted by RockyMtnTigerWDE
War Damn Eagle Dad!
Member since Oct 2010
108480 posts
Posted on 11/10/21 at 8:42 pm to
Now picture a confident 17 year old walking in with an AR 15 with a sling and I bet your eyes quickly fixate on that 17 year old right quick.
Posted by CAD703X
Liberty Island
Member since Jul 2008
92441 posts
Posted on 11/10/21 at 8:43 pm to
Who the frick charges headlong at someone holding an AR while screaming I'm going to fricking kill you?

Oh yeah pea brain rosenped
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
35577 posts
Posted on 11/10/21 at 8:43 pm to
quote:

Why would you do anything that could be perceived as a threat to someone with a gun????!

I'm with ya, and this isn't intended to apply to the Rittenhouse situation, but more generally speaking, if you are certain you're not doing anything wrong yet someone accosts you with a firearm for no apparent legitimate reason.....if I'm in that situation I may be inclined to believe that it's just as likely as not that the person has intentions of harming/killing me. Thus perhaps it's inadvisable to simply sit there and let it happen, may as well go all in.
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
46949 posts
Posted on 11/10/21 at 8:43 pm to
Racist pedomidgets.

That’s who
Posted by Clames
Member since Oct 2010
19231 posts
Posted on 11/10/21 at 8:56 pm to
quote:

Mostly his not answering questions directly


He actually was but you lack the education to understand that.

quote:

some of his answers seemed untruthful


Again, since you lack the necessary education to understand his answers, that doesn't make them untruthful. Your ignorance has no bearing on the facts.
Posted by Northshoretiger87
Member since Apr 2016
4954 posts
Posted on 11/10/21 at 9:00 pm to
And, after seeing this, who the hell would prosecute the self-defending victim for murder? Oh, yeah, Binger, a radical socialist who has a little of DA power and soros money.

Frick liberalism. It’s a disease.

FJB LGB
first pageprev pagePage 106 of 109Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram