Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Low birth rates is often cited as a reason for needing mass migration. | Page 4 | Political Talk
Started By
Message

re: Low birth rates is often cited as a reason for needing mass migration.

Posted on 1/17/26 at 1:38 pm to
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
121309 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 1:38 pm to
I’m asking in general so I understand your perspective
Posted by Strannix
C.S.A.
Member since Dec 2012
53447 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 1:43 pm to
Yet the progtards have been at the same time for decades screaming about overpopulation and food shortages, yet on the other hand are hell bent on importing millions of high breeding third world immigrants into white Christian nations.

Its a plan, Asians dont go for this nor do the prime movers push it on Asians, the enemy of the prime movers are white Christians.
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
117174 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 1:45 pm to
Declining birth rates would be irrelevant if we stopped importing 3rd world scum and stopped wasteful gov. spending. So what if our population declined by 100 Million. That would equal our population 50 years ago and everything was fine back then.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
127374 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 1:45 pm to
He’s an internet-moderate, black surgeon.
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
121309 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 1:45 pm to
I thought he was a nurse
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
121309 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 1:46 pm to
The same people that tell you services are strained, things are “expensive”, etc. want unlimited floods of illiterate immigrants pouring in each year.
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
42718 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 1:49 pm to
quote:

It’s part of a woman’s nature

Don’t forget the first woman wasn’t satisfied with paradise

Exactly. It's not only biblical, it's older than that. Plato wrote about it and Aristotle emphasized it in Nicomachean Ethics.

quote:

Aristotle’s view that women are subject to men, impulsive, compassionate, complaining and deceptive, and that women’s happiness should matter for society, but that natural order is disrupted, and often destroyed, when women are placed in positions of power over a society and above the immediate family.

Aristotle's theory of sex polarity, rooted in his metaphysics of form and matter, as foundational to a natural hierarchy in which the male is naturally positioned to rule and the female to be ruled, particularly within the household. But Aristotle also endows women with courage and justice "in serving mode," suggesting a more complex moral valuation than a simple polarity of domination and passivity.


In other words, women must be contained within the confines of control, which they lack from a stoic perspective. They must be granted power provided that it is limited to the family unit and specific circles.

Every dominant civilization has fallen once a high level of comfort has been realized among the females and they are handed power and control over societies.

Remember, comfort is just another word for boredom. Women must be kept engaged, free from boredom. No time to wander. Otherwise chaos always ensues.

This is also explained by Aristotle in his writings concerning Cause and Effect.

quote:

Aristotle’s theory of cause and effect centers on the idea that to truly understand something, one must answer the question "why?"—not just in terms of immediate triggers, but through four distinct types of causes.  These are not modern scientific causes but explanations for why something exists or occurs. 


If a woman lives in too much comfort she becomes bored. (That's "The Cause.") At which time she will strive for a relief from her boredom, and chaos soon follows. ("The Effect")

All four of Aristotle's "Causes" lead to the same "Effect" in terms of the chaos that ensues.
Posted by onmymedicalgrind
Nunya
Member since Dec 2012
12048 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 1:51 pm to
I’m not black, I’m mahogany.
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
55538 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 2:10 pm to
There needs to be a push to normalize the family unit and incentivize them having kids.


Example lower taxes on families. The more kids the lower the tax.

Right now the USA incentivizes divorce and having kids out of wedlock to get more pay from working people.


Posted by Rainier Fog
Member since Jul 2025
886 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 2:18 pm to
quote:

Why not just ban hormonal birth control?



That's not the people they won't inhabiting the country.

The Great Replacement
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
12142 posts
Posted on 1/17/26 at 2:39 pm to
Screw that. Why stop there?

Like I said above, socialize everything.

Why not? If you’re gonna be a bear, be a grizzly.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram