- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Massie storms out of GOP Lincoln Dinner
Posted on 2/7/26 at 2:49 pm to Bobby OG Johnson
Posted on 2/7/26 at 2:49 pm to Bobby OG Johnson
quote:
Yet you feel quite comfortable in here pushing your views on me and everyone else as your way is the right way, correct?
Look in the mirror
Meanwhile:
Keep tap dancing & making excuses for him while not accomplishing anything and giving away the country to the Dems
Bottom line here is that your savior went and acted like a jackass at a GOP fundraising event that I hear was something like 15k a table and had to have the mic taken away from him because he went over time and stormed out & now y'all are butthurt
& as I have said on numerous occasions on here is that we need to replace the majority of our politicians because currently we are still way behind despite having a majority
Not voting for the bullshite is accomplishing something.
Posted on 2/7/26 at 2:49 pm to lsuguy84
quote:
think your problems lie with the uni-party, do nothing for decades, elected “Republicans”. Trump should probably figure out how to unite the party instead of help create a larger chasm. In fact, I’d say Thune is right now directly opposing what Trump was elected to execute, not Massie. I’d be working with Massie, Rand, and Elon on a strategy.
While mostly true, that’s not even close to realistic. The libertarian utopia will never exist, just as the commie utopia will never exist.
Posted on 2/7/26 at 2:54 pm to djsdawg
I don’t disagree, but someone is going to have to get them on board so we can vote lock in step. The left is and has been more united, with their voting, as opposed to the right. We have to bridge that gap.
Posted on 2/7/26 at 3:00 pm to djsdawg
quote:
The libertarian utopia will never exist, just as the commie utopia will never exist.
This is dishonest framing.
It's not about creating a "libertarian utopia".
It's about moving as close to that utopia as you can, to counter the move more towards that leftist "utopia".
How does creating a platform bringing us closer to the leftist "utopia" promote the goal of countering that exact result? It makes no sense.
So instead of a culturally left authoritarian system we get a religious fascist authoritarian system? Cool?
Posted on 2/7/26 at 3:24 pm to davyjones
quote:
I can hardly even pay attention to the substance of your post because I’m fascinated to see what kind of “boom” and bow incoming. You watch. It’s coming. Lol
Are you as dumb as the other 2 chucklelfricks that drone on about how Massie this and Massie that and great Trump is, but you can't define what the frick it means to be a Republican?
Posted on 2/7/26 at 3:31 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
It's about moving as close to that utopia as you can, to counter the move more towards that leftist "utopia".
Enabling the left is moving as far away from that “free” utopia as you can. It’s truly a “cut off your nose” strategy, and people like you are too smart to understand that.
quote:
So instead of a culturally left authoritarian system we get a religious fascist authoritarian system? Cool?
No, there is a normal middle to be had. Flawed, yes, but far better than the other option. The right isn’t close to as dangerous as the left, but people like you are too smart to understand that, again.
This post was edited on 2/7/26 at 3:37 pm
Posted on 2/7/26 at 3:32 pm to lsuguy84
quote:
don’t disagree, but someone is going to have to get them on board so we can vote lock in step. The left is and has been more united, with their voting, as opposed to the right. We have to bridge that gap.
Libertarians would rather die than compromise on their muh principles.
Posted on 2/7/26 at 3:38 pm to djsdawg
quote:
Enabling the left is moving as far away from that “free” utopia as you can.
Exactly, so why are y'all doing just that?
That's, as they say, the point.
quote:
The right isn’t close to as dangerous as the left,
The extreme right and left are just as dangerous, and an authoritarian state of either is going to be bad for people like me who value freedom and independent thought.
Posted on 2/7/26 at 3:39 pm to djsdawg
quote:
Libertarians would rather die than compromise on their muh principles.
No. They would rather discuss things by the policy, not by group identification. What's the difference if it's the left or right proposing a similarly bad policy?
Posted on 2/7/26 at 3:46 pm to Cuz413
What do you think? I don’t think you’re gonna find too many amongst us here who wouldn’t agree that you don’t present much of a challenge for me. And I don’t waste time with attempts at mature conversation with immature people. That wouldn’t really make sense, now would it? And your post there clearly demonstrates a problem with that. Plus, I’m not too impressed with your internet search offering anyway. Additionally, you weren’t even astute enough to understand the purpose of my original reply. It was a rhetorical question intended to prove a point. Point being, you’re hypocritical, but I don’t even believe you would be able to grasp why. So why bother if you’re me??
Posted on 2/7/26 at 3:48 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Exactly, so why are y'all doing just that? That's, as they say, the point.
Muh principled Libertarian’s are the ones enabling the left.
quote:
The extreme right and left are just as dangerous, and an authoritarian state of either is going to be bad for people like me who value freedom and independent thought.
What is this extreme right you speak of? Give 5 examples..
Only one side has shifted the Overton window to an extreme and it’s the left. They have completely abandoned common sense; for examples:
1. trans
2. no borders
3. DEI
4. voter ID
5. law and order
Posted on 2/7/26 at 3:51 pm to djsdawg
quote:
Muh principled Libertarian’s are the ones enabling the left.
The policies that typically lead to this silliness are anti-conservatives (hence you referencing the principles)
Why are you promoting leftism, is the question.
quote:
Only one side has shifted the Overton window to an extreme and it’s the left. They have completely abandoned common sense; for examples:
1. trans
2. no borders
3. DEI
4. voter ID
5. law and order
Those 5
No wonder you can't discuss things on a policy level
Posted on 2/7/26 at 3:58 pm to 3down10
quote:
Not voting for the bullshite is accomplishing something.
No, it’s not. Not voting for something and forming coalitions and finding ways to make things better is accomplishing something. Not voting for something and not changing anything is the definition of not accomplishing anything.
Posted on 2/7/26 at 4:11 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Those 5 No wonder you can't discuss things on a policy level
Explain your laugh take on each of those 5 issues.
After that, Let’s see your 5 issues where the right is just as bad as the left.
Posted on 2/7/26 at 4:34 pm to davyjones
You replied to a comment not directed at you. And I kindly obliged to entertain it and give you a sincere response off the top of my head. If you know anything of my postings I have taken a liking to pre civil war history and the division of the country from its earliest years until the war.
You however, gave me a snide, childish response, to which deserved criticism.
So, are you going to provide an answer to my question?
You however, gave me a snide, childish response, to which deserved criticism.
So, are you going to provide an answer to my question?
Posted on 2/7/26 at 4:51 pm to djsdawg
quote:
Libertarians would rather die than compromise on their muh principles.
Back in the 60s and 70s people like you were telling everyone "Better Red than Dead".
You leftists never change.
Posted on 2/7/26 at 4:56 pm to the808bass
quote:
No, it’s not. Not voting for something and forming coalitions and finding ways to make things better is accomplishing something. Not voting for something and not changing anything is the definition of not accomplishing anything.
"Coalitions" just means naming your price to sell out the American citizens.
Let me give you a hint since you can't figure it out - we are ALL LOSING. The difference between the 2 of us is your stupid arse cheers for it.
Posted on 2/7/26 at 5:04 pm to 3down10
This is a futile take.
You’re acknowledging he’s not accomplishing anything. And on that, we agree.
You’re acknowledging he’s not accomplishing anything. And on that, we agree.
Posted on 2/7/26 at 5:15 pm to the808bass
so you hate govt shutdowns?
you WANT STUFF TO BE HAPPPENING?
you WANT STUFF TO BE HAPPPENING?
Posted on 2/7/26 at 5:15 pm to Cuz413
quote:
You replied to a comment not directed at you.
Yeah that’s not quite how open discussion forums work. Sounds like you may be looking more along the lines of email or direct messaging.
quote:
You however, gave me a snide, childish response, to which deserved criticism.
Nope. Go back and give your post that solicited that response from me. Purely belligerent.
quote:
So, are you going to provide an answer to my question?
Nope, because it’s a dumb question. Let’s see if you can follow this: put 10 different Republicans in a room together and guess what? You’re going to have 10 different definitions of what they are as a Republican. But see, I’m not even a Republican, I’m registered Independent. Now, if you’d like me to give you my personal definition of “an Independent,” seeing as how the next guy over who is also a registered Independent, his own “definition” isn’t going to be like superior to mine or anything, it’s sort of in the eye of the beholder, right? Get it? There isn’t one single definition of a Republican that applies to everyone, although I’m sure you probably think yours should apply to every Republican in existence. Lol
Popular
Back to top


1








