- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Notable Epstein Accuser Virginia Roberts Giuffre Dies by "Suicide"
Posted on 4/26/25 at 9:12 am to VoxDawg
Posted on 4/26/25 at 9:12 am to VoxDawg
quote:Trump also had a DOJ that was actively subverting him in his first term as well.
He's a lawyer who denies the existence/relevance of sealed indictments which were filed at a higher than normal level during the Trump 45 term that have yet to be acted upon/unsealed.
quote:I hope you are right. Im so ready for justice to be done on these career criminals.
We're in the midst of the biggest sting operation in the history of the world and the contrarians literally can't even.
0
Posted on 4/26/25 at 9:13 am to blueboy
quote:
They have a deposition regarding the activities of Epstein and Maxwell. In no way does that mean everything she knows about everyone everywhere has been recorded.
Again, this assumes the lawyers involved are retarded.
Depositions are not limited to trial testimony, and these lawyers were suing people for money. Why would they not ask about other big pockets to sue?
I mean, even OUTSIDE of the deposition, this rings true. Why would they avoid possibly making millions more, only to sit on it for a decade, to then do something? In what way does this make sense by anyone involved who actually did something against Epstein and Maxwell for once?
Posted on 4/26/25 at 9:14 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:If you are an example of a lawyer, being retarded is a high probability
Again, this assumes the lawyers involved are retarded.
Posted on 4/26/25 at 9:15 am to AuburnTigers
I see you avoided answering the questions yet again.
Posted on 4/26/25 at 9:17 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Again, this assumes the lawyers involved are retarded.
Prosecution: I'd like to add this tweet to record your Honor? It states she is NOT suicidal and that there were many people who wanted to silence her.
SFP: OBJECTION! Relevance!
Judge: Overruled. Go fetch me a coffee
Posted on 4/26/25 at 9:18 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:your questions are circulatory. Why is this tweet relevant in 2025? Asked and answered.
I see you avoided answering the questions yet again.
Posted on 4/26/25 at 9:18 am to AuburnTigers
quote:
your questions are circulatory.
They are not. I'll ask again
quote:
Why would they not ask about other big pockets to sue?
I mean, even OUTSIDE of the deposition, this rings true. Why would they avoid possibly making millions more, only to sit on it for a decade, to then do something? In what way does this make sense by anyone involved who actually did something against Epstein and Maxwell for once?
quote:
Why is this tweet relevant in 2025?
It's literally not. Question answered.
Posted on 4/26/25 at 9:19 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:also, your questions are just a vain attempt to steer the conversation away from your weak stance on the tweet.
I see you avoided answering the questions yet again.
Posted on 4/26/25 at 9:20 am to AuburnTigers
quote:
your questions are just a vain attempt to steer the conversation away from your weak stance on the tweet
No they were directly responsive to blueboy's post.
The tweet situation is ended. Nobody has given any factual or logical arguments to justify relevance. Until they do it's a win for me.
Posted on 4/26/25 at 9:21 am to SlowFlowPro
blah blah blah the point is that you have no idea what she knew or if it all had been disclosed.
She settled with people she apparently had actual contact with (one of whom killed himself in jail). What grounds would she have to sue someone who did something with another girl? She could be a witness to someone else's story, though.
quote:The prosecutors?
Why would they avoid possibly making millions more,
She settled with people she apparently had actual contact with (one of whom killed himself in jail). What grounds would she have to sue someone who did something with another girl? She could be a witness to someone else's story, though.
quote:Yours assumes that you know everything there is to know. You know nothing, dude.
this assumes the lawyers involved are retarded.
Posted on 4/26/25 at 9:23 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:Her life was in danger. Easy answer.
Why would they not ask about other big pockets to sue?
I mean, even OUTSIDE of the deposition, this rings true. Why would they avoid possibly making millions more,
quote:A tweet saying she is not suicidal is NOT relevant to her suicide? You truly are an imbecile
It's literally not
Posted on 4/26/25 at 9:24 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:talk about delusion
The tweet situation is ended. Nobody has given any factual or logical arguments to justify relevance. Until they do it's a win for me.
Posted on 4/26/25 at 9:25 am to Warboo
She got a settlement, the Queen had to give Prince Andrew after he sold a few manors. It was over.
Far be it from me to see SFP's point. But legally this lady was done. Ghislaine is in prison and done.
A lot if fishy things though...
After Virginia posted she had days to live it came out she was not badly injured. They released the accident report with the bus.
She was supposedly in a custody battle divorcing. I am wondering if she is just in Bora Bora or she sleeps with the fishes.
She tweeted she was not nor ever will be suicidal, and she adored her 3 children.
Far be it from me to see SFP's point. But legally this lady was done. Ghislaine is in prison and done.
A lot if fishy things though...
After Virginia posted she had days to live it came out she was not badly injured. They released the accident report with the bus.
She was supposedly in a custody battle divorcing. I am wondering if she is just in Bora Bora or she sleeps with the fishes.
She tweeted she was not nor ever will be suicidal, and she adored her 3 children.
Posted on 4/26/25 at 9:27 am to cajunangelle
quote:Not relevant - SFP
She tweeted she was not nor ever will be suicidal, and she adored her 3 children.
Posted on 4/26/25 at 9:27 am to blueboy
quote:
blah blah blah the point is that you have no idea what she knew or if it all had been disclosed.
Sounds like you're making the same "certainty" mistake as someone else.
quote:
The prosecutors?
No. The attorneys who did the most work against Epstein, her civil attorneys.
quote:
She settled with people she apparently had actual contact with (one of whom killed himself in jail). What grounds would she have to sue someone who did something with another girl?
We're talking about the attorneys, not her.
They're not prohibited from suing other people with different plaintiffs, and they were the ones asking the questions.
quote:
Yours assumes that you know everything there is to know. Y
Not at all.
quote:
You know nothing, dude.
I know what was and wasn't in the depositions and the allegations at Maxwell's trial.
Posted on 4/26/25 at 9:28 am to AuburnTigers
quote:
Her life was in danger. Easy answer.
Her life wasn't in danger suing Epstein, Maxwell, and Prince Andrew?
And we're talking about the lawyers, not her.
quote:
A tweet saying she is not suicidal is NOT relevant to her suicide?
Not with the lack of temporal/causal link, no.
Posted on 4/26/25 at 9:30 am to cajunangelle
quote:
After Virginia posted she had days to live it came out she was not badly injured. They released the accident report with the bus.
She was supposedly in a custody battle divorcing. I am wondering if she is just in Bora Bora or she sleeps with the fishes.
She tweeted she was not nor ever will be suicidal, and she adored her 3 children.
She's a sex abuse victim. It's not unreasonable to think she had psychological problems due to this. Nothing you posted is outside what you'd expect from that sort of paradigm.
Posted on 4/26/25 at 9:30 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Why would they not ask about other big pockets to sue?
You’ll find the answer to this question within the subject of the OP.
Perhaps they didn’t want to get unalived.
Posted on 4/26/25 at 9:31 am to Speckhunter2012
quote:
Virginia almost dies by car wreck but after being blessed by God to still be alive, takes her own life?
That's exactly what they want you to believe, so that the story will just fade away.
Like Hillary's home server.
Huma's laptop.
Hunter's laptops
Seth Rich *botched robbery, street murder*
Awan 'tech' bros
Fake Russia collusion
Foreign source Steele dossier
Mueller investigation
Illegal and baseless impeachments.
Politically motivated lawfare
Unlawful raid on Mar-a - Lago
Attempted assassination in Butler, PA
They're super cereal! There's NOTHING to see here!!
Posted on 4/26/25 at 9:33 am to Robin Masters
quote:
Perhaps they didn’t want to get unalived.
While they sue Epstein, Maxwell, and Prince Andrew?
Page 7 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News