Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us NYT front page for tomorrow.... | Page 4 | Political Talk
Started By
Message

re: NYT front page for tomorrow....

Posted on 5/23/20 at 11:41 pm to
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
103379 posts
Posted on 5/23/20 at 11:41 pm to
So, they are paralleling another case where a Republican is getting blamed for deaths principally caused by a Democrat’s decisions.
Posted by NashvilleTider
Your Mom
Member since Jan 2007
15371 posts
Posted on 5/23/20 at 11:48 pm to
So melodramatic
Posted by TSmith
New Orleans, La.
Member since Jan 2004
2322 posts
Posted on 5/23/20 at 11:48 pm to
“Black N Mild, 44, New Orleans, bounce DJ and radio personality”

Why didn’t they try finding his real name?
Posted by Bayou_Tiger_225
Third Earth
Member since Mar 2016
12622 posts
Posted on 5/23/20 at 11:59 pm to
Incalculable loss, or .03% of the US population...?
Posted by Pelican fan99
Lafayette, Louisiana
Member since Jun 2013
39151 posts
Posted on 5/24/20 at 12:01 am to
quote:

How is it incalculable if it’s an actual number?


its incalculable because even the NYT knows the number is bs
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
103379 posts
Posted on 5/24/20 at 12:01 am to
Maybe they mean to Cuomo’s political future considering how many people died directly as a result of his decisions on nursing homes.
Posted by Bayou_Tiger_225
Third Earth
Member since Mar 2016
12622 posts
Posted on 5/24/20 at 12:03 am to
I go look at Twitter from time to time and it's scary.

The amount of people who actually believe Trump killed all 100k of those people is shocking. I never imagined TDS would reach this level.
Posted by texashorn
Member since May 2008
13122 posts
Posted on 5/24/20 at 12:08 am to
Despite Drop in Crime, an Increase in Inmates
quote:

The continuing increase in the prison population, despite a drop or leveling off in the crime rate in the past few years, is a result of laws passed in the 1990's that led to more prison sentences and longer terms, said Allen J. Beck, chief of corrections statistics for the department's Bureau of Justice Statistics and an author of the report.

I was going to guess a decrease in probation sentencing. Close enough.

I don’t get the melt over “incalculable,” either. I can see how you could make fun of it if you didn’t understand the wording (separate adjectives separately applying to deaths and loss).
Posted by LSUKNUT
Naples, Florida
Member since Jun 2007
2345 posts
Posted on 5/24/20 at 12:31 am to
6th name on the list was a murder victim. Killed by an inmate released because of Covid.

Jes’ sayin’.
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
103379 posts
Posted on 5/24/20 at 12:37 am to
Which makes some governors’ responses a gift that keeps on giving.

Especially as they threaten to imprison business owners for reopening after they just released murderers for compassionate reasons.
Posted by LSUTigerBand85
On the Edge
Member since Nov 2008
253 posts
Posted on 5/24/20 at 12:52 am to
“They were not simply names on a list”

Then NYT proceeds to drop a huge list.

Great lesson in irony, NYT...
Posted by ManBearTiger
BRLA
Member since Jun 2007
22358 posts
Posted on 5/24/20 at 12:54 am to
Appears pretty calculable on its face, to me at least
Posted by Little Trump
Florida
Member since Nov 2017
5817 posts
Posted on 5/24/20 at 3:24 am to
Incalculable means their methods to decide who’s died from COVID can’t be described

There’s no way that per population NY and NJ have 10x more COVID deaths than Florida and Texas

Democrats are lying incalculably
This post was edited on 5/24/20 at 3:25 am
Posted by cadillacattack
the ATL
Member since May 2020
10197 posts
Posted on 5/24/20 at 6:21 am to


quote:

Were the swine flu victims this lucky? Oh wait, Obama was President.


Posted by Wolfhound45
Member since Nov 2009
127076 posts
Posted on 5/24/20 at 6:25 am to
quote:

forced nursing homes
Prog ovens.
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 5/24/20 at 6:27 am to
quote:


I don’t get the melt over “incalculable,” either. I can see how you could make fun of it if you didn’t understand the wording (separate adjectives separately applying to deaths and loss).



blah blah blah

Of COURSE you don't.
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
80181 posts
Posted on 5/24/20 at 6:59 am to
quote:

Not kidding this is one of the names. (First column). Given that name are you sure there wasn't a comorbidity factor?


Given the location are we sure it wasn't lead poisoning?
Posted by AURaptor
South
Member since Aug 2018
11958 posts
Posted on 5/24/20 at 7:08 am to
The Old Gray Lady really socking it to China, i see.
Posted by mtntiger
Asheville, NC
Member since Oct 2003
29521 posts
Posted on 5/24/20 at 7:10 am to
This is nothing more than a repackaging of the death totals from Gulf War II during W's presidency. As soon as dumbass got into the WH, it was like no one ever died in a war again.
Posted by Pepperoni
Mar-a-Lago
Member since Aug 2013
4192 posts
Posted on 5/24/20 at 7:22 am to
quote:

How many of these are assumed covid19 deaths? 1/3?


NYT clickbait and TDS and cherry picking. They (NYT) screen-scraped obits from around the country that had the word Covid or Covid related in them.

Your question is still valid because the assumption is that the obituary accurately reflected the coroner or doctor who stated that the individual died due to Covid. E.g., a 102 year old who died of complications due to Covid.


first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram