- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Oh no Massie bros!
Posted on 7/3/25 at 4:00 pm to BBONDS25
Posted on 7/3/25 at 4:00 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
But Massie had no problem siding with the Dems and raising the debt ceiling when Biden was president.
A statement like this makes it appear that you don’t care about the actual circumstances surrounding his vote on the debt ceiling in 2023.
If you want people to look at the BBB with nuance, you can’t then evaluate Massie’s past votes in a binary fashion.
The strength of the Trumpists propagandists attacks on Massie evaporate in such a discussion, so it’s understandable why you would do exactly that.
1
Posted on 7/3/25 at 4:04 pm to the808bass
quote:
A statement like this makes it appear that you don’t care about the actual circumstances surrounding his vote on the debt ceiling in 2023.
That’s a poor assumption. It’s simply pointing out that Massie isnt a staunch conservative that opposes spending. I understand the dems promised a 1% decrease. Massie got duped. The dems, like always reneged on their promise. Just like they did to Reagan with amnesty. It’s their MO. Massie should have known that.
quote:
If you want people to look at the BBB with nuance, you can’t then evaluate Massie’s past votes in a binary fashion.
And vice-versa.
quote:
Trumpists propagandists
Trite cliche.
quote:
it’s understandable why you would do exactly that.
Disappointing to hear this from you. To say the least.
Posted on 7/3/25 at 4:04 pm to Cuz413
quote:
One only needs to look at the very OP of this thread to see up and down votes to surmise what he means by "this board"
That’s not a rational explanation for using the broad stroke of “this board.” So that doesn’t help any.
Posted on 7/3/25 at 4:05 pm to the808bass
I'll absolutely be sending Massie campaign donations
Posted on 7/3/25 at 4:05 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
Which require 60 votes. So. Nothing ever gets done. Tax cuts sunset. fricking brilliant. Learn basic procedure. Moron
No, they do not require 60 votes. You will not find that anywhere in the constitution.
You're talking about a filibuster rule that is completely made up by the senate to discourage single issue bills. If it's a single issue bill, they say it requires 60 votes to stop the filibuster - but even then, it still only requires the same 51 votes when it actually goes to the vote. But if it's a omnibus bill, then the rules are different and they only need the 51 votes from the start and nobody can filibuster them.
So blow me with your bullshite excuses. The only thing preventing single issue bills is congress and that nobody challenges it - not even Trump the Great. And we sure as hell can't count on people like you to hold people accountable for actual change, that would require getting off your knees.
This post was edited on 7/3/25 at 4:08 pm
Posted on 7/3/25 at 4:06 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
I understand the dems promised a 1% decrease. Massie got duped.
You might want to try to recall who was running the house in 2023. The Democrats didn’t promise the 1% spending cut.
Posted on 7/3/25 at 4:07 pm to Iron Lion
quote:
This board
This board does whatever the little blonde materialistic whores on FOX news tell them to do
Posted on 7/3/25 at 4:08 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
I understand the dems promised a 1% decrease. Massie got duped.
It was Mike Johnson who got around it and "duped" him, not the democrats.
Posted on 7/3/25 at 4:08 pm to davyjones
quote:
Can you just answer the guy’s question?
It's a superficial question -
What could be/have passed with this current Congress and environment that wasn't?
- because the answer is nobody knows what could have been passed if Trump had pushed all his chips in on a reformative spending bill, decidedly conservative (the real kind).
It's not unlike all the Covid spending. Remember the argument, "but what could he have done differently?!" - as if his requesting more spending than Dems proposed and lobbying to primary the only Republican objecting to handing Democrats trillions didn't mean what it obviously did.
For supporters that view Trump as remarkably persuasive, strong and powerful, you sure do give him a pass on not leading.
This post was edited on 7/3/25 at 4:10 pm
Posted on 7/3/25 at 4:08 pm to deltaland
Massie and the conservatives want tax hikes
Posted on 7/3/25 at 4:10 pm to 3down10
quote:
No, they do not require 60 votes. You will not find that anywhere in the constitution.
nope. Just the senate rules, you dumb frick. Posted on 7/3/25 at 4:11 pm to BBONDS25
Oh my God you're so stupid - that's been covered on here 15 times why that was necessary
Simpleton dumbfricks like you will keep repeating it though
Simpleton dumbfricks like you will keep repeating it though
Posted on 7/3/25 at 4:11 pm to 3down10
I love all the crying and gnashing of teeth. Inject it in my veins.
Posted on 7/3/25 at 4:12 pm to the808bass
quote:
You might want to try to recall who was running the house in 2023. The Democrats didn’t promise the 1% spending cut.
Sigh. The dems promised to vote for the cuts. Even if they didn’t. It doesn’t help the fact Massie got duped into voting for spending.
So you’re telling me it’s ok to vote for more spending if you get other stuff you want? You sure that’s the position you want to take? I mean Massie did…you sure you want to?
Posted on 7/3/25 at 4:12 pm to Houag80
quote:
I love all the crying and gnashing of teeth. Inject it in my veins.
Yeah, because you're an idiot who treats politics like a team sport instead of being someone who gives a shite about the actual issues.
Posted on 7/3/25 at 4:12 pm to Harry Rex Vonner
quote:
This board does whatever the little blonde materialistic whores on FOX news tell them to do
Crutch of an argument from an intellectual lightweight.
This post was edited on 7/3/25 at 4:15 pm
Posted on 7/3/25 at 4:13 pm to 3down10
You especially ya little bitch.
Posted on 7/3/25 at 4:13 pm to 3down10
quote:
It was Mike Johnson who got around it and "duped" him, not the democrats.
Look up you dumb frick. . And it was McCarthy you ignorant idiot.
This post was edited on 7/3/25 at 4:16 pm
Posted on 7/3/25 at 4:13 pm to the808bass
quote:
You might want to try to recall who was running the house in 2023
Yeah, Keven McCarthy
And soon after Massies vote to increase the debt ceiling for McCarthy, the House took out McCarthy
So rightfully, Mike Johnson didnt follow thru on anything that Massie used to betray the House with
Posted on 7/3/25 at 4:14 pm to Harry Rex Vonner
quote:
Oh my God you're so stupid - that's been covered on here 15 times why that was necessary Simpleton dumbfricks like you will keep repeating it though
So additional spending is ok when you need it and to get other concessions? Is that what you’re saying.
You dumb frick.
Think. fricking moron 
Page 6 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News