- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Pittsburgh Post Gazette endorses Trump
Posted on 11/1/20 at 9:42 am to DeltaTigerDelta
Posted on 11/1/20 at 9:42 am to DeltaTigerDelta
The comments are unhinged
0
Posted on 11/1/20 at 9:55 am to DeltaTigerDelta
As someone who’s not just enamored with DJT’s personality, I so appreciate this article. When it’s all boiled down, I’m voting for the brash guy who comes across as an a-hole at times because I think the other side has gone nuts. But they worded it a lot better than me. 
Posted on 11/1/20 at 10:00 am to NakaTrash
quote:
I am the only one who loves DJT’s personality?
I wouldn't say I love his personality; That being said, he has the heart of a fricking lion and i dig that about him! KAG 2020!
Posted on 11/1/20 at 11:26 am to boXerrumble
Not when you factor in the east side McKeesport rocks and sewickly
Posted on 11/1/20 at 11:28 am to piggilicious
quote:
As someone who’s not just enamored with DJT’s personality, I so appreciate this article. When it’s all boiled down, I’m voting for the brash guy who comes across as an a-hole at times because I think the other side has gone nuts. But they worded it a lot better than me.
and isn't that American politics? It always comes down to voting for the lesser a-hole. Why should this year be different? BY that metric Trump should roll.
Posted on 11/1/20 at 11:30 am to Strannix
Who knew the DNC declaring they’ll massively increase taxes on business and the middle class while crippling the domestic oil and gas industries would backfire on them?
Posted on 11/1/20 at 11:38 am to Nguyener
Help me understand how they will do this??
“while crippling the domestic oil and gas industries”
“while crippling the domestic oil and gas industries”
Posted on 11/1/20 at 11:40 am to Thecoz
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/10/21 at 11:47 pm
Posted on 11/1/20 at 11:41 am to Thecoz
quote:
Help me understand how they will do this??
“while crippling the domestic oil and gas industries”
Banning drilling and fracking, emissions laws, fossil fuel taxes, government subsidies for green new deal, etc....
Posted on 11/1/20 at 11:43 am to DeltaTigerDelta
And not one millennial will read that bc it's not 250 characters or less
Posted on 11/1/20 at 11:44 am to DeltaTigerDelta
this is a BFD.
Posted on 11/1/20 at 11:54 am to Scruffy
We had a thread on this already...
Op posted a nice map of federal lands and a quick comparison of maps on us resource plays show pretty much minimal overlap of federal land to any resource plays in the us....Biden said no new leases on federal land which pretty much means no impact in us to fracking operationsin the us on resource plays and especially no impact to Texas..ok...penn...
Paradox basin ...maybe a little but doubtful...Bakken pretty much leases up already...
So the fracking impact on federal land does not impact any oil and gas activity significantly that I am aware of...
The removing of subsidies to oil companies will of course impact them but They should not have them now as they have been in place forever and were there to help us drill when we needed to build stuff for war efforts...
A lot of the green stuff is in place and what they want will get watered down and the industry will solve it anyway...
Cleaner operations required...yes..and some cost to the industry...but shutting the industry down ( not the subsidies)... I just do not see it...oil and gas are to much of our life at this point in history...Maybe more accelerated transition ... but that has Been happening anyway
Op posted a nice map of federal lands and a quick comparison of maps on us resource plays show pretty much minimal overlap of federal land to any resource plays in the us....Biden said no new leases on federal land which pretty much means no impact in us to fracking operationsin the us on resource plays and especially no impact to Texas..ok...penn...
Paradox basin ...maybe a little but doubtful...Bakken pretty much leases up already...
So the fracking impact on federal land does not impact any oil and gas activity significantly that I am aware of...
The removing of subsidies to oil companies will of course impact them but They should not have them now as they have been in place forever and were there to help us drill when we needed to build stuff for war efforts...
A lot of the green stuff is in place and what they want will get watered down and the industry will solve it anyway...
Cleaner operations required...yes..and some cost to the industry...but shutting the industry down ( not the subsidies)... I just do not see it...oil and gas are to much of our life at this point in history...Maybe more accelerated transition ... but that has Been happening anyway
Posted on 11/1/20 at 11:56 am to Thecoz
Sorry scruffy meant as a response to different poster...
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News