- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Prog Logic - Train Was Speeding So That Means We Don’t Need To Invest In Infrastructure
Posted on 12/19/17 at 6:49 am to DEG
Posted on 12/19/17 at 6:49 am to DEG
quote:
The investment had already been made dipshit.
Oh ok. I Didn’t know that the crumbling bridges around the country have all been fixed and we don’t need to invest in our infrastructure because these tracks are new.
2
Posted on 12/19/17 at 6:49 am to jptiger2009
quote:
Higher tax dollars are something conservatives are against.
You don't know shite. Conservatives aren't against higher taxes - when used wisely. Only an idiot thinks all things in this world should be free. I guarantee you if a "concrete" plan was put forth showing infrastructure money was being spent wisely without any waste, you'd see conservatives jump on board quicker than liberals would.
Posted on 12/19/17 at 6:51 am to BeeFense5
quote:No one has said or even implied that moron. The point is trump’s tweet was imbecilic at best. Right out of the gate, his first tweet was a political one blaming the accident on infrastructure. He happened to be wrong on this one. That doesn’t mean the left does not support infrastructure.
saying the infrastructure is fine.
This post was edited on 12/19/17 at 6:54 am
Posted on 12/19/17 at 6:52 am to TheMidasTouch
quote:
No one has said or even implied that moron
Spin deflect
Posted on 12/19/17 at 6:53 am to TheMidasTouch
“If it saves one life”
Posted on 12/19/17 at 6:54 am to BBONDS25
quote:
feeble leftist mind not realizing spending can be cut elsewhere
I get a kick out of people assuming that someone who challenges something is automatically on the other side. It's not just you; it's like 80% of this board. I totally understand why you're infatuated with President Trump; he speaks what enters your mind.
But, that's the problem...
Posted on 12/19/17 at 6:54 am to BeeFense5
quote:
BeFense5
Listen to yourself. Trump is the one who used the train accident to refresh the infrastructure discussion. Yet THE TRAIN WAS ON NEW INFRUSTRUCTURE.
Posted on 12/19/17 at 6:55 am to Errerrerrwere
It’s not a deflection at all. It directly addressed the premise of the OP. And it certainly was not spin. If anyone is spinning, it’s the OP making this into a narrative that it is not. But the sheep here will follow. So kudos to him.
Posted on 12/19/17 at 6:56 am to jptiger2009
quote:
I get a kick out of people assuming that someone who challenges something is automatically on the other side. It's not just you; it's like 80% of this board. I totally understand why you're infatuated with President Trump; he speaks what enters your mind.
Nice melt but why can’t we cut spending else where to pay for something much needed like infrastructure?
Posted on 12/19/17 at 6:56 am to DEG
So something that has always been a democratic issue, you will #resist now that Trump wants it?
Such a cute little Prog taking orders...
Such a cute little Prog taking orders...
Posted on 12/19/17 at 6:56 am to jptiger2009
quote:
I get a kick out of people assuming that someone who challenges something is automatically on the other side.
You mean like when you chastised the op saying "conservatives are against higher taxes".
Spare me your sanctimonious patronization. You seem very impressed with yourself.
But, that's the problem...
Posted on 12/19/17 at 6:59 am to BBONDS25
If Donald Trump could have it, he and the 1%ers wouldn't pay a single tax dollar. I assure you that he'd abolish the IRS without anything to replace it.
He is interested in money...power. It's no secret. All else is secondary.
He is interested in money...power. It's no secret. All else is secondary.
Posted on 12/19/17 at 7:00 am to DEG
quote:
Trump is the one who used the train accident to refresh the infrastructure discussion. Yet THE TRAIN WAS ON NEW INFRUSTRUCTURE.
Cool.
Still not sure why you are melting over it. His point is valid. We need to invest in our infrastructure. And before you even attempt, I am fully on record supporting any infrastructure spending Obama proposed also because I know how truly important it is.
Posted on 12/19/17 at 7:00 am to DEG
quote:
TRAIN WAS ON NEW INFRUSTRUCTURE.
Is this really true.?
Posted on 12/19/17 at 7:02 am to BeeFense5
quote:
Nice melt but why can’t we cut spending else where to pay for something much needed like infrastructure?
Because nobody in Washington is actually interested in cutting spending.
Posted on 12/19/17 at 7:04 am to BeeFense5
Infrastructure spending is the cornerstone of liberal macro-economics. I missed when that changed. Oh yeah, when they all went more insane last Nov.
Posted on 12/19/17 at 7:04 am to jptiger2009
quote:
If Donald Trump could have it, he and the 1%ers wouldn't pay a single tax dollar. I assure you that he'd abolish the IRS without anything to replace it.
Couldn't keep the inner leftist inside even one post after chastising me for calling you a leftist.
Beautiful.
Posted on 12/19/17 at 7:05 am to BeeFense5
America has got to have some of the worst infastructure of any first world country.
Posted on 12/19/17 at 7:06 am to BeeFense5
quote:
His point is valid. We need to invest in our infrastructure.
You missed the point completely. The next time there is a thread on the OT about a drunk driver killing a family of four on a four lane interstate, please make your first post about and only about the need for better roads. It won’t carry the same weight because you are not president of the United States and it won’t be seen by millions and millions of people. But that might help you get the point.
This post was edited on 12/19/17 at 7:09 am
Posted on 12/19/17 at 7:07 am to TheMidasTouch
quote:
Is this really true.?
It was to be implemented next year, I believe.
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News