- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Prosecutor from SDNY resigns over Adams case.
Posted on 2/13/25 at 5:06 pm to Tchefuncte Tiger
Posted on 2/13/25 at 5:06 pm to Tchefuncte Tiger
Good!!!
You know the old saying, " lead , follow, or get outta the way!!".
You know the old saying, " lead , follow, or get outta the way!!".
Posted on 2/13/25 at 5:07 pm to BBONDS25
This is a pretext the dems will use if they win the midterms to investigate Trump. We know their playbook now and that’s why Bove was smart to take her notes.
Posted on 2/13/25 at 5:07 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
fire of a letter to Bondi.
It was well done.
Totally ignored that their initial decision to go after Adams was political,
but otherwise, well done.
Posted on 2/13/25 at 5:09 pm to Tchefuncte Tiger
quote:
"Mr. Bove admonished a member of my team who took notes during that meeting and directed the collection of those notes at the meeting’s conclusion."

Posted on 2/13/25 at 5:10 pm to BigBro
quote:
I'm confused. Why does Bondi think the case should be dropped? Is it good or bad if the case is dropped?
According to some folks suspicions, Adams has important information about James and Bragg that would aid in their upcoming investigations.
Makes sense to me ......
Posted on 2/13/25 at 5:10 pm to Veritas
Adams is a clown. In that same interview with Tucker, he still said he supported being a sanctuary city. I think the prosecutor is right to be pissed.
Posted on 2/13/25 at 5:10 pm to Decatur
quote:
The Sassoon-Bondi letter is def worth reading
I'm as pro-Trump as it gets, but you have to respect her reasoning.
"In particular, the court is unlikely to acquiesce in using the criminal process to control the behavior of a political figure."
Posted on 2/13/25 at 5:10 pm to Decatur
I thought the dem position was that all such papers were property of the federal government. That was your position during the boxes hoax.
Posted on 2/13/25 at 5:13 pm to Veritas
Like Pedos to a playground. 
Posted on 2/13/25 at 5:13 pm to NIH
Once people dig a little deeper, everything will be more clear.
Posted on 2/13/25 at 5:14 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
"In particular, the court is unlikely to acquiesce in using the criminal process to control the behavior of a political figure."
Huh? The court doesn’t prosecute, the DOJ does, and they decided to drop the case. This lady wanted to take her “notes” and publish them to the media to undermine Trump’s DOJ.
Posted on 2/13/25 at 5:14 pm to Tchefuncte Tiger
Article says it's a "rebuke" so obviously written with a partisan slant. Weaponize the DOJ to the max, they tried to illegally convict, jail and destroy Trump, hope he makes them all pay going back to Hillary.
Posted on 2/13/25 at 5:20 pm to bluewatersailor
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. A veritable Thursday Afternoon Massacre
Posted on 2/13/25 at 5:22 pm to Decatur
Why are you calling me a pup?
What kind of liberal twink language is this?
What kind of liberal twink language is this?
This post was edited on 2/13/25 at 5:23 pm
Posted on 2/13/25 at 5:22 pm to Decatur
On top of capitulating to Putin on Ukraine. Bang up few days for the MAGA crowd.
Posted on 2/13/25 at 5:26 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
On top of capitulating to Putin on Ukraine. Bang up few days for the MAGA crowd.
I’ve yet to regret my vote for Trump.
Posted on 2/13/25 at 5:26 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
On top of capitulating to Putin on Ukraine. Bang up few days for the MAGA crowd.
Fantastic days. Lay off the kids liberal.
Posted on 2/13/25 at 5:27 pm to Riverside
quote:
Huh? The court doesn’t prosecute, the DOJ does, and they decided to drop the case. This lady wanted to take her “notes” and publish them to the media to undermine Trump’s DOJ.
I don't know what her motives were, but she has a solidly conservative background. I think almost all of the Team Trump legal positions are winners, but this one is not.
The judge is probably not going to grant a dismissal WITHOUT prejudice (meaning that DOJ could reopen the case against Adams). The only reasonable inference for seeking dismissal without prejudice is that the Trump Administration wants to maintain leverage over Adams.
Very smart, but unlikely to pass legal scrutiny. Hope I'm wrong.
Posted on 2/13/25 at 5:31 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
Adams’s attorneys repeatedly urged what amounted to a quid pro quo, indicating that Adams would be in a position to assist with Department’s enforcement priorities only if the indictment were dismissed," Sassoon wrote. "Mr. Bove admonished a member of my team who took notes during that meeting and directed the collection of those notes at the meeting’s conclusion."
Popular
Back to top


0







