Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Prosecutor from SDNY resigns over Adams case. | Page 7 | Political Talk
Started By
Message

re: Prosecutor from SDNY resigns over Adams case.

Posted on 2/14/25 at 7:56 am to
Posted by IvoryBillMatt
Member since Mar 2020
10077 posts
Posted on 2/14/25 at 7:56 am to
quote:

The Sassoon-Bondi letter is def worth reading

LINK


Decatur, how many of the 79 people who downvoted you do you think actually read the letter?
Posted by IvoryBillMatt
Member since Mar 2020
10077 posts
Posted on 2/14/25 at 8:07 am to
quote:

It's funny how the Lib/Progs are trumpting her Scalia bona fides in screaming about this.

Apparently, there is a limit to prosecutorial discretion.


I'm neither a Lib nor a Prog, but I am a former student of Scalia's in law school. What are you babbling about? Scalia was very much against injecting politics into criminal law.

I don't see any evidence that Sassoon was injecting politics. In her letter (which you didn't read), she laid out the reasons why the case couldn't be dismissed without prejudice in good faith.

Once federal criminal prosecution is initiated, there IS a limit to prosecutorial discretion. Rule 48(a) requires leave of court to dismiss a case.
Posted by IvoryBillMatt
Member since Mar 2020
10077 posts
Posted on 2/14/25 at 8:11 am to
quote:

This is exactly why she's pissed


If she were so publicity hungry, why would she resign from being a prosecutor in the SDNY, THE highest profile prosecutorial gig in the US?
This post was edited on 2/14/25 at 8:12 am
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
113784 posts
Posted on 2/14/25 at 8:11 am to
quote:

quote:
It's funny how the Lib/Progs are trumpting her Scalia bona fides in screaming about this.

Apparently, there is a limit to prosecutorial discretion.


I'm neither a Lib nor a Prog, but I am a former student of Scalia's in law school. What are you babbling about? Scalia was very much against injecting politics into criminal law.


As you well know, the Left hates Scalia and everything/everyone that he influenced in any way. So for them to reference her Scalia connections in their reeeeeeeee-ing about this is amusing.

Also, my point about prosecutorial discretion has nothing to do with the FRCP.
Posted by IvoryBillMatt
Member since Mar 2020
10077 posts
Posted on 2/14/25 at 8:14 am to
quote:

Also, my point about prosecutorial discretion has nothing to do with the FRCP.


Thanks for the response. Sorry to accuse you of babbling.

Mind explaining your point about prosecutorial discretion?
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
113784 posts
Posted on 2/14/25 at 8:23 am to
quote:

quote:
Also, my point about prosecutorial discretion has nothing to do with the FRCP.


Thanks for the response. Sorry to accuse you of babbling.

Mind explaining your point about prosecutorial discretion?


Trump (and supporters [including me]) said that the cases against him were abuses of prosecutorial discretion, which opponents poo-pooed taking the position that it was unfettered (i.e., could not be abused [and wasn't being abused]). I am merely pointing out example #2311244 of the hypocrisy of the Left.
This post was edited on 2/14/25 at 8:28 am
Posted by IvoryBillMatt
Member since Mar 2020
10077 posts
Posted on 2/14/25 at 8:26 am to
quote:

There is something larger in the works relative to the Trump administration and the mayor. I can hardly wait to see what that is. I knew when Adams started to cozy up with Trump before the election, he was going to get a pardon. We will now see why.
There are a lot of bad, uncooperative politicians in New York. For now Adams will not be one of them.


I agree with all of this. That's why I wanted to see the pardon route rather than muddying the legal waters with a dismissal without prejudice.
Posted by Decatur
Member since Mar 2007
32138 posts
Posted on 2/14/25 at 8:26 am to
None
Posted by RollTide4547
Member since Dec 2024
4073 posts
Posted on 2/14/25 at 8:28 am to
quote:

Guess the depoliticization of DOJ lasted a whole week or two


Or the charges were "politicization" to begin with. They started under biden when Adams was demanding that the Federal Government do something. After what we saw happen against Trump, I can see it.
This post was edited on 2/14/25 at 9:05 am
Posted by IvoryBillMatt
Member since Mar 2020
10077 posts
Posted on 2/14/25 at 8:30 am to
quote:

 I am merely pointing out example #2311244 of the hypocrisy of the Left.


Got it. Thanks. I agree.
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
84904 posts
Posted on 2/14/25 at 8:31 am to
quote:

Trump (and supporters [including me]) said that the cases against him were abuses of prosecutorial discretion, which opponents poo-pooed taking the position that it was unfettered (i.e., could not be abused [and wasn't being abused]). I am merely pointing out example #2311244 of the hypocrisy of the Left.


Except Trump’s choice for US Atty looked at the actual evidence and said no, there is meat on the bone here (and additional crimes of obstruction).

Her superior, who literally said we don’t care about the evidence, instructed her to dismiss anyway.

Five more prosecutors much closer to the actual evidence have also resigned instead of carrying out a nakedly political directive.

So again, depoliticization for thee, not for me



Posted by VOR
New Orleans
Member since Apr 2009
68206 posts
Posted on 2/14/25 at 8:33 am to
You’vre pretty damned selective with the facts. It’s the Trump DOJ that has politicized the case. Adams was getting his palm greased on the reg. Sleazy stuff. The prosecutor who just resigned was very reputable and, in fact, a conservative Republican.
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
120952 posts
Posted on 2/14/25 at 8:33 am to
I can’t believe people hear listened to the same Adams interview that I did and came away with the idea that he was charged with bs. He is full of shite.

But - if trump gets a puppet in nyc and returns it from whatever it’s became, maybe there is a positive out of the quid pro quo.
Posted by IvoryBillMatt
Member since Mar 2020
10077 posts
Posted on 2/14/25 at 8:45 am to
quote:

I can’t believe people hear listened to the same Adams interview that I did and came away with the idea that he was charged with bs. He is full of shite.

But - if trump gets a puppet in nyc and returns it from whatever it’s became, maybe there is a positive out of the quid pro quo.


Agree with this. That's why I think the pardon (political) route, rather than the legal route should have been taken.

Much easier to have Trump say in complete honesty: "I'm not completely sure what would have happened if the case against Mayor Adams had gone to trial. Certainly with the age of some of the allegations and the timing of the indictment, many people believe the Biden DOJ charged Mayor Adams only because he opposed the radical open border policies of the last Administration. There's urgent work to be done to Make America Great Again. America's greatest city isn't helped during this critical time by the distraction of having its mayor prosecuted for relatively minor allegations."
Posted by Tmcgin
BATON ROUGE
Member since Jun 2010
6544 posts
Posted on 2/14/25 at 8:48 am to
This case and Vince McMahon getting away with sex assaults
lets you know the SWAMP has pivoted but still there
Posted by This GUN for HIRE
Member since May 2022
5891 posts
Posted on 2/14/25 at 8:49 am to
quote:

If she were so publicity hungry, why would she resign from being a prosecutor in the SDNY, THE highest profile prosecutorial gig in the US?


Because she's impotent & realized it.
Posted by IvoryBillMatt
Member since Mar 2020
10077 posts
Posted on 2/14/25 at 8:59 am to
quote:

Because she's impotent


If she had just followed orders, do you think there is a more powerful legal position open to her than being a SDNY prosecutor?
Posted by This GUN for HIRE
Member since May 2022
5891 posts
Posted on 2/14/25 at 9:13 am to
quote:

If she had just followed orders, do you think there is a more powerful legal position open to her than being a SDNY prosecutor?


I'm not arguing that, but the position has as much power as the boss allows. In this case she had none.
Posted by IvoryBillMatt
Member since Mar 2020
10077 posts
Posted on 2/14/25 at 9:22 am to
quote:

I'm not arguing that, but the position has as much power as the boss allows. In this case she had none.


Fair enough.

After reading her letter to Bondi and looking into her background, Sassoon just doesn't come across to me as some rogue prosecutor whose chief goal is self-promotion. I don't think the Trump Administration would have made her acting US Attorney for SDNY if that were the case.
Posted by Havoc
Member since Nov 2015
38449 posts
Posted on 2/14/25 at 9:34 am to
quote:

The Sassoon-Bondi letter is def worth reading

Compelling. This is a tough one.
Jump to page
Page First 5 6 7 8 9 ... 12
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 12Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram