- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Q: Why no diversity in your movie cast? A: It's about Denmark in the 1750s.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 7:35 am to Bard
Posted on 2/12/26 at 7:35 am to Bard
quote:
That's the closest I've heard thus far to someone confronting such a moronic question with "How fricking stupid are you to think this is a worthwhile question?" After that, the reporter just needs to be hammered over and over with how ridiculous the question is.
This sort of thing isn't going to stop until the people being interviewed become willing to consistently push back on that silliness.
And thus we see the entire point of the dishonest framing.
1
Posted on 2/12/26 at 7:53 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Danish-Reporter:"Are you worried about the conundrum that *Parasite*, with an all-South Korean cast, might be eligible for Best Picture in Hollywood, but an all-Nordic cast might not be, 'cause of their new inclusion rules, even though they both have the same level of diversity?"
That is messed up. A 100% asian cast is seen as diverse, but a 100% caucasion cast is not.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 7:54 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
You seem a bit broken.
Nah, you seem and likely are demented because your game is up. No one buys into you sick BS.
There is no "alternative" history. It's called "Fiction" for a reason.
Fiction is a creative work, chiefly a narrative work, portraying individuals, events, or places that are imaginary or in ways that are imaginary. Fictional portrayals are thus "inconsistent with fact, history, or plausibility." I suggest you get a grasp on the meaning of "alternative" as both a noun and an adjective.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 8:02 am to kbmaverick
quote:
Nah, you seem and likely are demented because your game is up. No one buys into you sick BS.
Yeah, confirmed broken.
All I did was correct your incorrect statement about fiction and then point out you went off the deep end. No "sick BS"
quote:
There is no "alternative" history. It's called "Fiction" for a reason.
Bridgerton is fiction, my dude.
quote:
Fiction is a creative work, chiefly a narrative work, portraying individuals, events, or places that are imaginary or in ways that are imaginary.
Yes, you're explaining how they are set in alternative histories. Thank you.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 8:11 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The diversity in Bridgerton has the same suspension of disbelief a typical action movie or superhero movie requires.
Lolololol
Never change.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 8:25 am to ClientNumber9
quote:
Imagine being from a race so insecure you have to shoehorn yourself into every era, time period, and civilization for validation.
Well, it’s not like they can rest on their own achievements. Thus, they have to try to steal from others.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 8:27 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
And thus we see the entire point of the dishonest framing.
What was dishonest about it?
Posted on 2/12/26 at 8:28 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Brigderton is something different,
Why am I unsurprised that you are an expert on this smut tv series?
Posted on 2/12/26 at 8:43 am to Nutriaitch
quote:
do you think Star Wars really happened a long time ago in a galaxy far away?
Man in the high castle is fake? Alternative History is a literal genre in film, lol.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 8:45 am to SlowFlowPro
OK. Good point.
Maybe the reporter wasn't so dumb but the bigger point is that having a diversity requirement is idiocy.
I don't know about this particular reporter but we all know that many out there stand by this idiotic policy.
So you are correct that this is not the problem I thought it was. It's a bigger and worse problem. Thanks.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 8:45 am to TrueTiger
Yeah lets do do a movie about the ZULU tribe in Africa in 1750 and make the tribe half white
Posted on 2/12/26 at 8:48 am to SlowFlowPro
You’re an a-hole and you do not contribute value
Posted on 2/12/26 at 8:52 am to SlowFlowPro
" pulling d-ck....peeing " Thats pretty low class. You are better than that.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 8:55 am to Willie Stroker
quote:
non-white culture.
That show to used to show a good bit of white redneck frickery
The black guys would just run.
The white redneck would try and talk himself out of whatever it was just to have a pound of weed fall out of the back seat.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 8:57 am to Bard
quote:
What was dishonest about it?
If you have to edit the quote or give a poor attempt at a paraphrase to get a point across, you have no point.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 9:01 am to Bard
quote:
What was dishonest about it?
Did you watch the video with full context I posted?
Posted on 2/12/26 at 9:02 am to TigerFanatic99
quote:
Man in the high castle is fake? Alternative History is a literal genre in film, lol.
Their feelings don't care about your facts
Posted on 2/12/26 at 9:07 am to TrueTiger
I watched a documentary about the KKK last week. This is getting ridiculous.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 9:19 am to ibldprplgld
Is that really any worse than Warner Oland (Swedish) playing Charlie Chan?
...or Christopher Lee (English) playing Fu Manchu?
I submit that Oland and Lee are far worse as they're masquerading as Orientals, whereas Jodie Turner-Smith isn't trying to be white.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 9:22 am to TrueTiger
The entire goal with these BS movies is to convince the young idiots that what they see in these films is historical fact. They aren't taught real history in schools. It's just another step in the globalist erasure of history.
This post was edited on 2/12/26 at 9:23 am
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News