Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Republicans beware of Pete Buttigieg | Page 3 | Political Talk
Started By
Message

re: Republicans beware of Pete Buttigieg

Posted on 4/23/19 at 12:00 am to
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 4/23/19 at 12:00 am to
so he's a russian asset but it's a boom because they couldn't prove he didn't help the russians campaign for trump?
Posted by Toddy
Atlanta
Member since Jul 2010
27251 posts
Posted on 4/23/19 at 12:03 am to
quote:

didn't we hear over and over again leading up to 2016 that a Republican will never win the presidency again because of muh demographic changes


I don't think you really comprehend how close Trump eked out his win. He is probably the only one that could have won and certainly wouldn't have had the Democrats ran anyone except Hillary. All you have to do is look at Georgia to see how demographic changes are coming into play. What % will whites make up the electorate in 8 or 10 years. It's shrinking every year. Not too far off when whites will not be in the majority.

And I doubt , if the parties stay in their present forms, that they ever win the popular vote again. The GOP has only won that once in the past 27 years. How many more years until the changing demographics push the Electoral College past the tipping point?
Posted by Decatur
Member since Mar 2007
32255 posts
Posted on 4/23/19 at 12:04 am to
quote:

Butt guy is going to have a lot of trouble in the south’s dem primaries.


As a member of this demographic and starter of this thread, well...
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
96271 posts
Posted on 4/23/19 at 12:07 am to
quote:

eked out his win.


it was a landslide

2020 will be worse for Butts or crazy b
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
73698 posts
Posted on 4/23/19 at 12:11 am to
quote:

don't think you really comprehend how close Trump eked out his win. He is probably the only one that could have won and certainly wouldn't have had the Democrats ran anyone except Hillary.
I strongly disagree with this. Donald Trump was won only because he won white working class voters by like the largest margin any candidate has ever won them. On the other hand, he did awful (for a republican) among rich, suburban whites.

Someone like Rubio or John Kasich would have performed similar among white workers, while also maintaining much higher levels of support among suburban whites....leading to an easy popular vote and expanded EC victory.

Trump's strategy did pay off, but plenty of other people could have defeated hillary. She is the worst nominee ever.
Posted by Toddy
Atlanta
Member since Jul 2010
27251 posts
Posted on 4/23/19 at 12:13 am to
quote:

He's obviously not smart enough to build wealth. JUST what this country needs. Another politician without a fricking clue how to build wealth. Guaranteed, there are at least 50 -100 posters here today on the PT, yours truly included, who earn between 1.5x to 4x annually what he does and who have personal wealth of 3x - 10x easily. This board could run cirles around butt boy in economics.



Maybe he's not that concerned about building wealth. You think that because you're net worth is more than his that's some how relevant to jack shite. Maybe he adheres to different priorities. He's a Harvard grad and Rhodes scholar. I'm sure if making more money were his priority he would be doing something other than occupying the mayor's office in South Bend. I mean do you realize how pathetic and insecure you sound? You'd be surprised what I've made but I don't post abut it on anonymous message board seeking validation that I'm "smarter" just because of a large paycheck. I'm quite confident that he's accomplished more in his 37 years than you ever will in your lifetime. Your post pretty much confirms it.
Posted by HubbaBubba
North of DFW, TX
Member since Oct 2010
51295 posts
Posted on 4/23/19 at 12:18 am to
quote:

Toddy
I struck a nerve so must have discovered a weakness here. NICE!

*Oh, and you get an upvote for being all blubbery and indignant. Very amusing. BTW - Fox pays you well, I'm sure.
This post was edited on 4/23/19 at 12:23 am
Posted by Toddy
Atlanta
Member since Jul 2010
27251 posts
Posted on 4/23/19 at 12:19 am to
quote:

it was a landslide


Only in your either ignorant of the facts or deluded mind. If a little over 30,000 voters in three Midwestern states had switched their votes or if Democrats had turned out in traditional numbers, trump would be a footnote in history.

If you don't understand this you're not working discussing this with . But but his Electoral vote tally ! Landslide !
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
156721 posts
Posted on 4/23/19 at 12:21 am to
quote:

Make it your mantra and see how it works out.


Make some more predictions.
Posted by funnystuff
Member since Nov 2012
9052 posts
Posted on 4/23/19 at 12:22 am to
That, or you said something objectively stupid which deserved to be demolished. My vote’s on the latter.
Posted by Toddy
Atlanta
Member since Jul 2010
27251 posts
Posted on 4/23/19 at 12:23 am to
quote:

I struck a nerve so must have discovered a weakness here. NICE!


Not at all. I used to think that was important . Made a LOT of money. Then I realized how all silly that shite was. Was miserable with misplaced priorities . I can go back do that anytime but I realized that's a lot more to life buddy. It does help that I was frugal though. Life is the best and most rewarding it's ever been for me. That's why I don't post much on here anymore. Life is good. Hope the same for you.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
62930 posts
Posted on 4/23/19 at 12:24 am to
quote:

The GOP has only won that once in the past 27 years.
how many times did Bill Clinton win the popular vote?
Posted by HubbaBubba
North of DFW, TX
Member since Oct 2010
51295 posts
Posted on 4/23/19 at 12:27 am to
Will just confirm what I said. His lack of wealth indicates that he hasn't the deep understanding of how business and banking works. One of the major reasons Trump was voted for was for exactly what we have now. A world leading economy, and reduction in impediments to business development and investment. Don't see that butt boy has a resume that he can stand on when it comes to the economy. Simple enough.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
96271 posts
Posted on 4/23/19 at 12:30 am to
quote:

If a little over 30,000 voters in three Midwestern states had switched their votes or if Democrats had turned out in traditional numbers, trump would be a footnote in history.



Losers always make weak excuses

If they would weed out the illegals he would have taken cali



Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
73698 posts
Posted on 4/23/19 at 12:30 am to
quote:

If a little over 30,000 voters in three Midwestern states had switched their votes
Toddy, you often say this, but you ignore that those three states were considered blue states before 2016.

Obama easily won Wi, PA, and Mi by around 8-10 points.

Don't you think it is significant that a state swings that much in only 4 years? DJT was first GOP nominee to win those states since 1988.

If Beto O'rourke had won the texas senate race by 30,000 votes, would it be fair for me to down play the huge swing by saying "well, if 30000 texans changed ther mind, cruz would have won"?
Posted by Toddy
Atlanta
Member since Jul 2010
27251 posts
Posted on 4/23/19 at 12:39 am to
quote:


Don't you think it is significant that a state swings that much in only 4 years? DJT was first GOP nominee to win those states since 1988.



It's significant only that Trump was able to do that. You think another Republican could have done that? He will have to do that again to win. Past events and anecdotal evidence over the past few years question that. But he may very will win them again. There certainly is no sign the GOP can count on them at post Trump.
Posted by ninthward
Boston, MA
Member since May 2007
22374 posts
Posted on 4/23/19 at 12:43 am to
quote:

He’s smarter than Bill Clinton by a factor of five.
He's def smoked more cocks than ole Bill.
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
73698 posts
Posted on 4/23/19 at 12:45 am to
quote:

You think another Republican could have done that?
Against hillary? Yes. Kasich and maybe even rubio could have won all those states.

Don't laugh, but I don't think trump created the huge swing of white blue collar workers to the GOP. He was a symptom of it. 538 articles have noted that the large swings away from the dems among non-college whites started in 2010, continued in 2012, went even further in 2014, and then went huge for djt.

It doesn't have as much to do with the gop as it does with dems moving fairly left on issues that wwc union folks are normally conservative on: immigration, identity politics, etc.
Posted by BuckyCheese
Member since Jan 2015
57778 posts
Posted on 4/23/19 at 12:54 am to
quote:

Kasich and maybe even rubio could have won all those states.


Wrong
Posted by lsu480
Downtown Scottsdale
Member since Oct 2007
92903 posts
Posted on 4/23/19 at 1:15 am to
Nobody is scared of this radical homosexual
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram