Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Republicans propose rebate checks to offset inflation from tariffs | Page 5 | Political Talk
Started By
Message

re: Republicans propose rebate checks to offset inflation from tariffs

Posted on 7/29/25 at 7:21 pm to
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
79046 posts
Posted on 7/29/25 at 7:21 pm to
This is from Newsmax...
quote:

Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., introduced legislation on Monday that would send rebate checks to working Americans from the proceeds generated by tariffs, following through on a promise he made last week
How is it different from the OP? How is sending out checks, yet again, conservative? Want lower taxes? Lower the tax brackets again.

And you are the first poster in my 20 years who has been obsessed with me. Thanks.
This post was edited on 7/29/25 at 7:23 pm
Posted by Westbank111
Armpit of America
Member since Sep 2013
4592 posts
Posted on 7/29/25 at 7:47 pm to
Are you kidding “Arkaea” or however you spell that?

To pay off debt?

How about CANCEL THE FED

CANCEL THE DEBT & tell the Rothschilds to COME & GET IT!!!

Then REFUND me the $Millions I’ve been defrauded and stolen from!

Small business owner here & I’ve gotten fricked ag EVERY SINGLE TURN & I could care less about some “stimulus $5,000 bullcrap”

PRO-RATA REFUNDS for all the USAID, NGO, CLIMATE HOAX. MEDICAL COSTS (10X rest of world)

Frick all this bullshite “pay the debt”

We don’t owe anyone!

Do Your research on the Federal Reserve before you speak that BS around here.

That dent doesn’t exist in my mind & Trump better do the right thing & ABOLISH IT! Which is t what I’ve heard may happen when they usher in the digital currency, that is not my favorite, but it’s happening.
Posted by CDawson
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2017
19722 posts
Posted on 7/29/25 at 8:26 pm to
quote:

inflation


You are such a lying, low life, TDS deranged, dishonest moron.
Posted by SlayTime
Member since Jan 2025
3738 posts
Posted on 7/30/25 at 6:51 am to
quote:

Guess where that money comes from


Ban bet that US taxpayers absorb 100% of tariffs placed on foreign nations? Should be easy to dissect. Let’s pick 20 products and their cost today, if at EOY they are 15% more than they were prior to tariff deal, you win. If they aren’t, I win.

Deal?
Posted by 19
Flux Capacitor, Fluxing
Member since Nov 2007
35624 posts
Posted on 7/30/25 at 7:02 am to
Low T, with low IQ post.
Posted by jp4lsu
Member since Sep 2016
6491 posts
Posted on 7/30/25 at 7:11 am to
quote:

EU is paying the fees


Those get passed on to the consumer. The companies are not just eating that cost.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
127273 posts
Posted on 7/30/25 at 7:21 am to
quote:

if at EOY they are 15% more than they were prior to tariff deal


“I don’t understand how products are made” post.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
139804 posts
Posted on 7/30/25 at 7:25 am to
If y'all can't see this is one small method on the fiscal side to sustain our debt levels through inflation, I don't what to say.
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
46953 posts
Posted on 7/30/25 at 7:28 am to
quote:

How is it different from the OP?


The OP claims the checks are to offset inflation. Which is a clear and glaring lie.
Posted by SlayTime
Member since Jan 2025
3738 posts
Posted on 7/30/25 at 7:34 am to
quote:

I don’t understand how products are made” pos


Ok. You’re smart and I’m dumb. Educate me on how products are made.



Here is a Range Rover Evoque with a base price of 49,900. With a 15% tariff now in place this car base should jump to $57,385 on 8/1, no questions asked. That’s the crux of his argument, along with every other EU product because the taxpayer is absorbing all tariffs. His blanket statement, not mine.
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
27228 posts
Posted on 7/30/25 at 7:42 am to
quote:

Had lunch with a glazier today. He just submitted a $145,000 change order for a job due to tariffs on glass and aluminum.

Yass queen. Slay.


I'm impressed; the first typical response to one of these is to immediately claim it never happened, the second is an appeal to ridicule.

This time they've just pretended they never saw it at all.
Posted by AC1221
Member since May 2025
84 posts
Posted on 7/30/25 at 7:47 am to
Do you not understand that the 15% tariff applies to the wholesale price, and not the retail price?

And, for the most part, (as of now) tariffs are being eaten upstream, not going downstream.

Don't want to pay a tariff? Buy domestic.
Posted by i am dan
NC
Member since Aug 2011
31101 posts
Posted on 7/30/25 at 7:50 am to
quote:

TBoy

How's that dem party doing these days?

Looks like ya'll pretty much suck in every single way imaginable.
This post was edited on 7/30/25 at 12:19 pm
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
127273 posts
Posted on 7/30/25 at 8:11 am to
quote:

Ok. You’re smart and I’m dumb. Educate me on how products are made.


Products are composed of multiple components. Some are being assessed with a tariff. Some are not. Some companies aren’t sure if their products are affected by tariffs or not.

Let’s say I’m buying some extruded aluminum construction material. Let’s say $20,000 is my invoiced price.

Of that price, there’s profit markup. So the cost to buy materials, fabricate and ship the product are less than the invoiced price. We’ll use round numbers - $15,000 for a mythical profit of $5,000. Let’s say shipping comprised $2,000. Let’s say fabrication was $4,000. And let’s say that the aluminum was $8000.

The tariff isn’t assessed on the labor, shipping or non-tariffed parts. It’s only on the aluminum. So, there was a 15% markup on $8,000. That would be $1200.

So, if the seller passed through the tariffs like they are a tax (they are), then the cost increase on the $20,000 would be $1200.

Let me know what questions you have.
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
46953 posts
Posted on 7/30/25 at 8:26 am to
Oh NO! Someone in the market for a high-end luxury SUV might have to pay more for a European import, or GASP! consider buying American!?!??!

Enough sarcasm. Of course we risk seeing the price of IMPORTED products trend up. That's kind of the idea. American companies should be able to compete on a level playing field, and if we can manage to grow the American manufacturing sector - everyone wins. More jobs, lower prices, higher wages. frick Range Rover.
Posted by BeefSupreme
Metairie
Member since Sep 2016
593 posts
Posted on 7/30/25 at 8:36 am to
Josh Hawley=
Posted by SlayTime
Member since Jan 2025
3738 posts
Posted on 7/30/25 at 8:54 am to
quote:

Products are composed of multiple components. Some are being assessed with a tariff. Some are not. Some companies aren’t sure if their products are affected by tariffs or not. Let’s say I’m buying some extruded aluminum construction material. Let’s say $20,000 is my invoiced price. Of that price, there’s profit markup. So the cost to buy materials, fabricate and ship the product are less than the invoiced price. We’ll use round numbers - $15,000 for a mythical profit of $5,000. Let’s say shipping comprised $2,000. Let’s say fabrication was $4,000. And let’s say that the aluminum was $8000. The tariff isn’t assessed on the labor, shipping or non-tariffed parts. It’s only on the aluminum. So, there was a 15% markup on $8,000. That would be $1200. So, if the seller passed through the tariffs like they are a tax (they are), then the cost increase on the $20,000 would be $1200. Let me know what questions you have.


Sure. Which is why my initial post said let’s find a handful of products from EU across the spectrum, take their price today, and Aug 1 when tariff kicks in let’s see what product now costs here.

Certainly we can find some products across several industries to see if based on everything involved to deduct whether 100% of the price was passed along to consumers
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
127273 posts
Posted on 7/30/25 at 9:04 am to
quote:

Which is why my initial post said let’s find a handful of products from EU across the spectrum, take their price today, and Aug 1 when tariff kicks in let’s see what product now costs here.


That’s not what your post said. You know that.
Posted by SlayTime
Member since Jan 2025
3738 posts
Posted on 7/30/25 at 9:31 am to
quote:

Ban bet that US taxpayers absorb 100% of tariffs placed on foreign nations? Should be easy to dissect. Let’s pick 20 products and their cost today, if at EOY they are 15% more than they were prior to tariff deal, you win. If they aren’t, I win. Deal?


quote:

That’s not what your post said. You know that.


This is the post you initially responded to. Kindly explain what is different.

Posted by greygoose
Member since Aug 2013
14660 posts
Posted on 7/30/25 at 9:49 am to
Before income tax was codified into law, our nation subsided on tariffs. If we are collecting enough tariff money, with cutting waste, then why are 50% of the population not paying ANY income tax while the other 50% carries the load?

The whole DOGE thing should have opened a lot of eyes to where a lot your YOUR money was going. Funding fricking transgender programs in 3rd world countries???!!
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram