- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: RFK embarrasses Sensei Hannity.
Posted on 7/27/23 at 9:03 am to ItNeverRains
Posted on 7/27/23 at 9:03 am to ItNeverRains
quote:
Now RKF has some bat shite positions, but if the choice was RFK or Nikki Haley, you pick RFK every fricking time.
I've tried to explain this to my parents, and to my missus. They're still wrapped up in D/R.
RFK vs a Pence or a Haley is the easiest decision I'll ever make.
Posted on 7/27/23 at 9:04 am to theunknownknight
quote:
Hannity is starting to look like a Munster
True that, I've been saying he looks like Grandpa Munster for ages.
Posted on 7/27/23 at 9:14 am to Timeoday
quote:
RFK embarrasses Sensei Hannity.
Good. But in fairness, even a fourth grader can easily throw Hannity completely off his game by just refuting even a single one of his whole three talking points at any given time.
My rejection of Faux News after the two-on-one Chrissy Wallace and Biden vs. Trump "debate", came at a perfect time really. I was so tired of Hannity and his nightly repetition that I literally began to despise him for it. Loved him back in the day on Hannity and Colmes, but sometime after getting an evening slot on Faux he became the "conservative" version of a sky screaming dead horse kicker.
I don't really like RFK even though he and I do align on a very few things, but I'd honestly be disappointed in him if he couldn't easily make Hannity talk himself in circles like the idiot he is.
Posted on 7/27/23 at 9:23 am to Timeoday
"Fight to win with overwhelming force". Yeah, I'd like for Sean to point out just which of the (NeoCon) wars that we have fought for 'Democracy' has ended successfully.
FRK is right. A war with either Russia or the CCP and we'll get our asses handed to us. It won't be fought 'over there', it'll be here...and the combatants will be amongst our own ideologically divided, psychotic and desperate populous as life supporting infrastructure goes up in flames.
The martial art thing has got to the platitudinous war mongering Hannity; he thinks all those millions of $ will insulate him and his kids from the crash, but he's wrong. The best thing we could do with all that money is spend it on building the Computer Chip manufacturing base that the CCP/Tiawan will use to blackmail us when push comes to shove.
The Dems would do well to embrace and choose RFK to carry their water. But the radicals won't.
FRK is right. A war with either Russia or the CCP and we'll get our asses handed to us. It won't be fought 'over there', it'll be here...and the combatants will be amongst our own ideologically divided, psychotic and desperate populous as life supporting infrastructure goes up in flames.
The martial art thing has got to the platitudinous war mongering Hannity; he thinks all those millions of $ will insulate him and his kids from the crash, but he's wrong. The best thing we could do with all that money is spend it on building the Computer Chip manufacturing base that the CCP/Tiawan will use to blackmail us when push comes to shove.
The Dems would do well to embrace and choose RFK to carry their water. But the radicals won't.
Posted on 7/27/23 at 9:23 am to RoyalAir
quote:
I've tried to explain this to my parents, and to my missus. They're still wrapped up in D/R.
I’d love to see RFK in some sort of leadership position in a 2nd Trump administration. If you look at all the government solicitations using the search term “vaccines” it’s looking like the government is working to turn that into something as profitable if not more profitable than war. RFK needs to come in and completely dismantle it.
Posted on 7/27/23 at 9:37 am to DingLeeBerry
I'd like to see him as AG. He's been battling captured agencies in court for decades, says he knows how they operate and how to free them from corruption.
I'd like to see it happen, nothing else gets fixed until corrupt agencies are cleansed or dissolved.
I'd like to see it happen, nothing else gets fixed until corrupt agencies are cleansed or dissolved.
Posted on 7/27/23 at 9:48 am to Timeoday
Hannity is a horrible debater. His whole show is talking point and sound bites. He is the perfect useful idiot for Fox and the Chaney Rinos - simple and soft in the intellect department.
Posted on 7/27/23 at 9:48 am to DingLeeBerry
quote:
I’d love to see RFK in some sort of leadership position in a 2nd Trump administration.
Stopped reading right there.
It may come to that, if the choice is more Ridin’ with Biden, but we have a year for a better option to come into focus.
Trump served a purpose at a particular time.
This post was edited on 7/27/23 at 4:05 pm
Posted on 7/27/23 at 9:53 am to RoyalAir
Kennedy is by far the superior candidate in either party on foreign policy.
Trump does his sound-bite about "ending it in 24 hours". What that would mean in reality is he would talked out of it or prevented from doing it by his inevitable John Bolton, Mike Pompeo, Nikki Haley-type hires who are all trusted goyim to replace the Chosen People in the Biden administration.
Trump does his sound-bite about "ending it in 24 hours". What that would mean in reality is he would talked out of it or prevented from doing it by his inevitable John Bolton, Mike Pompeo, Nikki Haley-type hires who are all trusted goyim to replace the Chosen People in the Biden administration.
Posted on 7/27/23 at 10:46 am to PorkSammich
quote:
Hannity never knows the details on any issue. Total clown.
Hannity is like a lot of (maybe even most) voters. He gets the surface information on something then draws his line on the subject and declares his stance to be at that point. Bringing up more information which could provide a greater, more legitimate context that might mandate a change in his stance is avoided at all costs (as exampled by his pivoting away to China or just "Putin is evil" whenever RFK tried to explain how the war isn't as black/white as Hannity wants it to be).
Posted on 7/27/23 at 11:02 am to Timeoday
You know what? He's a Kennedy, but he's not a dumb coward, like the rest of them.
Posted on 7/27/23 at 11:04 am to Von
quote:
I'd like to see him as AG. He's been battling captured agencies in court for decades, says he knows how they operate and how to free them from corruption.
I'd like to see it happen, nothing else gets fixed until corrupt agencies are cleansed or dissolved.
See this is where I diverge. He is an environmental activist. Do a little research on RiverKeeppers and than get back to me about supporting him for AG.
Posted on 7/27/23 at 11:12 am to RayDaniel
quote:
Kennedy is by far the superior candidate in either party on foreign policy.
Trumps first term he was great on foreign policy idk what would make anyone say that
Posted on 7/27/23 at 11:52 am to Triple Bogey
He brought up situations that obviously Hannity knew nothing about and was unable to follow up with a cogent question to expand the discussion.
Instead, he changed the subject to align with his memorized talking points.
Instead, he changed the subject to align with his memorized talking points.
Posted on 7/27/23 at 12:01 pm to Timeoday
Embarrassing Senseless Sean is no tough feat.
Posted on 7/27/23 at 12:10 pm to Timeoday
I like rfk and Tulsi alot.
Posted on 7/27/23 at 12:11 pm to Von
quote:
I'd like to see him as AG. He's been battling captured agencies in court for decades, says he knows how they operate and how to free them from corruption.
I'd like to see it happen, nothing else gets fixed until corrupt agencies are cleansed or dissolved.
I'd like to see him as a special counsel digging into Covid profiteering and vaccines.
Posted on 7/27/23 at 12:13 pm to ChineseBandit58
quote:
Instead, he changed the subject to align with his memorized talking points.
I think it's 50/50 the argument whether Hannity is a low IQ moron or controlled opposition.
Posted on 7/27/23 at 12:37 pm to Jon Ham
quote:
RFK was answering the question with facts, in a conversation no one has really been having but we should be having, and Hannity interrupts him and steers it in a totally different direction. Bull shite.
That's because he NEVER will truly listen to the guest's response and build his follow-up and rebuttal from there. Terrible interviewer.
He had that clown de Blasio on one time, and he had several chances to rip him to shreds, but he failed to do so. As soon as de Blasio finished each response, Hannity would immediately ask his next question. So frustrating.
Posted on 7/27/23 at 12:56 pm to RayDaniel
quote:
think it's 50/50 the argument whether Hannity is a low IQ moron or controlled opposition.
Both. Sean Hannity is a legitimately stupid human being. I've posted this several times before but it's a mystery to me how that man became successful doing this. He has no talent whatsoever and on top of it he's an unlikable corndog. He let Gavin Newsom run all over him with absolutely insane made up statistics and he literally had nothing to say in response.
RFK is hard not to like. Something he and Trump have in common is the ability to just talk like normal human beings instead of preprogrammed bots like all the other politicians. If he gets the opportunity to debate Biden then all hell will break loose on the left
Popular
Back to top


2







