- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: RFK exposing more secrets by Big Pharma…
Posted on 9/6/25 at 10:35 am to somethingdifferent
Posted on 9/6/25 at 10:35 am to somethingdifferent
quote:
I notice you aren't answering any of my questions. Why is that?
I don’t need to. You didn’t answer any of my questions, so why would I answer yours? Just repeat the process and type whatever question you have for me into the same box you typed in the question I asked you earlier, and see what it tells you.
You’ll be occupied for hours
1
Posted on 9/6/25 at 10:36 am to Errerrerrwere
quote:
What’s wrong with ChatGPT as a source? It literally scrubs the entire internet in seconds for an answer.
quote:
In short: Dr. Zelenko’s early claims derived from a small, non-randomized study with limitations. His protocol appeared effective in that context, but broader and better-controlled research did not validate its safety or efficacy. As a result, the current scientific consensus does not support the effectiveness of that combination for treating COVID-19.
Posted on 9/6/25 at 10:36 am to FutureMikeVIII
All these people who took the vaccine are coming out of the woodwork hoping they don’t die soon.
#neverforgetwhattheydidtous2019
#neverforgetwhattheydidtous2019
Posted on 9/6/25 at 10:36 am to FutureMikeVIII
It is indeed fake news.
This baw is full of it.
This baw is full of it.
Posted on 9/6/25 at 10:37 am to TigerDoc
Jr high doc brought up "local Joe MD" as if that person is outside of all the corruption. When I bring up Zelenko, oh he's a quack.
Zelenko's case all along, as with that of other doctors whose reputation was sullied, was that the people in the CDC ordering the public to do this or that are not on the front line. The people who were against respirators, were for ivermectin/HCQ had treated thousands of patients with their protocols, you know, evidenced based medice like you 2 are babbling about but they were criticized by the powers that be
And then you 2 geniuses are getting all condescending wondering why people don't trust the experts.
MUH PUBMED
Zelenko's case all along, as with that of other doctors whose reputation was sullied, was that the people in the CDC ordering the public to do this or that are not on the front line. The people who were against respirators, were for ivermectin/HCQ had treated thousands of patients with their protocols, you know, evidenced based medice like you 2 are babbling about but they were criticized by the powers that be
And then you 2 geniuses are getting all condescending wondering why people don't trust the experts.
MUH PUBMED
Posted on 9/6/25 at 10:38 am to Ingeniero
quote:
In short: Dr. Zelenko’s early claims derived from a small, non-randomized study with limitations. His protocol appeared effective in that context, but broader and better-controlled research did not validate its safety or efficacy. As a result, the current scientific consensus does not support the effectiveness of that combination for treating COVID-19.
But somethingdifferent's chatGPT is the good chatGPT and yours is the BAD chatGPT!
Posted on 9/6/25 at 10:38 am to somethingdifferent
quote:
Zelenko's case all along, as with that of other doctors whose reputation was sullied, was that the people in the CDC ordering the public to do this or that are not on the front line. The people who were against respirators, were for ivermectin/HCQ had treated thousands of patients with their protocols, you know, evidenced based medice like you 2 are babbling about but they were criticized by the powers that be
Remember it like it was yesterday
Posted on 9/6/25 at 10:38 am to onmymedicalgrind
quote:I know I have read numerous examples of peer reviewed corruption
then clearly this isn’t a field you know much about
and you STILL aren't answering the questions
Posted on 9/6/25 at 10:39 am to TigerDoc
quote:
But somethingdifferent's chatGPT is the good chatGPT and yours is the BAD chatGPT!
He’s losing it?
Nah he’s been done lost it!
Posted on 9/6/25 at 10:39 am to somethingdifferent
still waiting for that question, chatGPT-boy.
Posted on 9/6/25 at 10:39 am to TigerDoc
quote:They're still there for you to read. Let us know when you want to face up to them
Now what's your question?
Posted on 9/6/25 at 10:39 am to FutureMikeVIII
quote:What did I say that's false?
FutureMikeVIII
Posted on 9/6/25 at 10:40 am to somethingdifferent
Stop venting on here and start using chat gpt for the other side of the argument. AI DEBATE!!!
Posted on 9/6/25 at 10:40 am to onmymedicalgrind
quote:
I don’t need to
How scientific of you
MUH PUBMED
Posted on 9/6/25 at 10:40 am to onmymedicalgrind
quote:
Stop venting on here and start using chat gpt for the other side of the argument. AI DEBATE!!!
Typical Stalinesque tactic.
Attack the source and never the message.
Posted on 9/6/25 at 10:42 am to TigerDoc
quote:
still waiting for that question, chatGPT-boy.
Imagine how much less they would trust doctors if, after they asked them a medical question in the office, they said “hold up, let me type it in to chat gpt first”
Posted on 9/6/25 at 10:42 am to somethingdifferent
quote:
They're still there for you to read.
You gish-galluped a bunch. Which one should I bother to effort-poast?
Posted on 9/6/25 at 10:43 am to Ingeniero
quote:There are front line doctors who say otherwise, as in, evidence from THOUSANDS of cases
Dr. Zelenko’s early claims derived from a small, non-randomized study with limitations. His protocol appeared effective in that context, but broader and better-controlled research did not validate its safety or efficacy. As a result, the current scientific consensus does not support the effectiveness of that combination for treating COVID-19
but we damn well better make fun of these quacks and their real world evidence because we can't have the medical experts being questioned
Oh and there's 62 genders
MUH SCIENCE
Posted on 9/6/25 at 10:43 am to somethingdifferent
quote:
How scientific of you
You don’t use science or research or data…you use chatGPT.
So if you have questions, why ask this “Jr doctor” you don’t trust when you could just ask chat gpt?
Unless you truly value my opinion?!??!?
Posted on 9/6/25 at 10:44 am to TigerDoc
quote:I'm waiting to hear the refutation but all I'm getting is unanswered questions and playground insults
This baw is full of it
typical
Page 6 of 48
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News