- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: RFK exposing more secrets by Big Pharma…
Posted on 9/6/25 at 10:44 am to somethingdifferent
Posted on 9/6/25 at 10:44 am to somethingdifferent
quote:
What did I say that's false?
Nothing in that paragraph is true. There were phased HUMAN clinical trials prior to the EUA. This is common knowledge.
This post was edited on 9/6/25 at 10:46 am
2
Posted on 9/6/25 at 10:44 am to Errerrerrwere
quote:
Typical Stalinesque tactic.
Attack the source and never the message.
Am I taking crazy pills? Isnt your entire argument "we can't trust doctors because they're doctors?"
Posted on 9/6/25 at 10:44 am to Robin Masters
quote:
Nothing makes doctors more contemptuous than “untouchables” advocating for their own health.
Ain't that the truth! Watch his reaction when you ask your oncologist about taking ivermectin for cancer.
Posted on 9/6/25 at 10:45 am to TigerDoc
quote:Read the thread. Put on your grown up pants
still waiting for that question, chatGPT-boy
And I have NEVER used chatGPT, genetic fallacy boy
Posted on 9/6/25 at 10:45 am to somethingdifferent
quote:
There are front line doctors who say otherwise, as in, evidence from THOUSANDS of cases
but we damn well better make fun of these quacks and their real world evidence because we can't have the medical experts being questioned
Err said earlier that the alternative method for assessing reliability is "just trust RFK". What you say here really is similar - "just trust the personal experience" of front-line contrarians.
Posted on 9/6/25 at 10:46 am to FutureMikeVIII
quote:
Nothing in that paragraph is true. There were phased clinical trials prior to the EUA. This is common knowledge.
So, the COVID trials took as long as usual or compared to vaccinations in the past?
OR
Trump’s warp speed was a success?
Posted on 9/6/25 at 10:46 am to somethingdifferent
I'll answer your most important question and if you can respond in good faith, I'll do more.
Which is most important?
Which is most important?
Posted on 9/6/25 at 10:46 am to onmymedicalgrind
quote:
You’re just all talking points, my guy. You couldn’t explain the first step in how a study even begins, yet alone the “corrupted peer review process.”
You’re right, we’re not credentialed.
But I’m gonna take a WILD fricking swing here and say that for a study to begin, IT MUST BE FUNDED.
Who funds it?
Because for every arrogant “you’re not from my world, what do you know peasant, have you seen my client log?” post, you gloss over real world anecdotal shite that we have all lived through.
It’s not sensationalism to say that myocarditis has EXPLODED since when, exactly? What does the massive spike correlate with, Doc?
The cat’s out the bag.
quote:
So the answer is “I have no clue how it’s been corrupted, but I have been told by people I like that it is so I must believe them!
Well gee golly, I can’t fricking prove that Jasmine Crockett and AOC are involved in insider trading, I’m not from that world, but do you want to argue that it doesn’t go on? Or are they just wise investors that parlayed their intelligence into a 30 million net worth in less than a decade?
Posted on 9/6/25 at 10:46 am to Ingeniero
quote:
Am I taking crazy pills? Isnt your entire argument "we can't trust doctors because they're doctors?"
I’ve argued way more than that. Mostly logic. Don’t gaslight.
Posted on 9/6/25 at 10:47 am to Errerrerrwere
quote:
So, the COVID trials took as long as usual or compared to vaccinations in the past?
OR
Trump’s warp speed was a success?
Trump’s warp speed was a success
Posted on 9/6/25 at 10:48 am to TigerDoc
quote:
Err said earlier that the alternative method for assessing reliability is "just trust RFK". What you say here really is similar - "just trust the personal experience" of front-line contrarians.
Not exactly. But everyone knows you are a dishonest hack with a gay agenda that willl gaslight the board for years.
Posted on 9/6/25 at 10:48 am to TigerDoc
quote:
Let me get a bit personal. That’s a fair question. For me it isn’t blind trust in institutions - it’s what I’ve seen through people I respect. My attendings, the generation that trained me, had treated kids paralyzed from polio, or who lost hearing from measles, or who died from meningitis. They watched those diseases disappear in front of their eyes as vaccines rolled out. By the time I hit the wards, my peers and I never saw those cases. They were just gone in the US.
So when I weigh whether to trust the CDC, FDA, or major trials, I think about that lived reality: generations of doctors seeing the before-and-after.
You forgot to mention (but I think you did it on purpose) that there was a definition change of what vaccines meant just before the introduction of the COVID vaccine. Any good Doctor would question this. Instead we had Doctors tell us to trust the science, but those same doctors didn't have the balls to ask the question. Why does this vaccine need the definition of Vaccine changed, in order for the COVID shot to get approval as a vaccine.
Posted on 9/6/25 at 10:48 am to FutureMikeVIII
quote:
Trump’s warp speed was a success
Of ffs
I like Trump. And even he said he regrets it.
Posted on 9/6/25 at 10:49 am to FutureMikeVIII
quote:
Trump’s warp speed was a success
It was! A massive success - saved hundreds of thousands of lives.
Posted on 9/6/25 at 10:49 am to onmymedicalgrind
quote:"Trust me, bro"
Imagine how much less they would trust doctors if, after they asked them a medical question in the office, they said “hold up, let me type it in to chat gpt first”
Alex Hofmann never existed
Posted on 9/6/25 at 10:49 am to TigerDoc
quote:Take your pick champ
Which one should I bother to effort-poast?
Posted on 9/6/25 at 10:50 am to dnm3305
quote:
You’re right, we’re not credentialed. But I’m gonna take a WILD fricking swing here and say that for a study to begin, IT MUST BE FUNDED. Who funds it? Because for every arrogant “you’re not from my world, what do you know peasant, have you seen my client log?” post, you gloss over real world anecdotal shite that we have all lived through. It’s not sensationalism to say that myocarditis has EXPLODED since when, exactly? What does the massive spike correlate with, Doc? The cat’s out the bag.
Perfectly written
Posted on 9/6/25 at 10:50 am to onmymedicalgrind
quote:Tell me what I said that's false
You don’t use science or research or data
quote:Nope
you use chatGPT
Posted on 9/6/25 at 10:51 am to dnm3305
quote:
But I’m gonna take a WILD fricking swing here and say that for a study to begin, IT MUST BE FUNDED. Who funds it?
Great question.
What’s your answer?
Who “funds” research?
I’ll give you a minute since I’m going to assume your answer is going to be a massive exhaustive list.
This post was edited on 9/6/25 at 10:52 am
Posted on 9/6/25 at 10:51 am to somethingdifferent
You made that chick quit 4 pages ago. she refuses to engage
Page 7 of 48
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News