Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Saw 2000 Mules. Here is the easiest way to see it. Here is what I think. | Page 6 | Political Talk
Started By
Message

re: Saw 2000 Mules. Here is the easiest way to see it. Here is what I think.

Posted on 5/8/22 at 10:18 am to
Posted by sgallo3
Lake Charles
Member since Sep 2008
26317 posts
Posted on 5/8/22 at 10:18 am to
quote:

You think people that don't want to see it will pay $20-30 to see it? Why such a high price?


Or maybe they know the people that will pay $30 to see it are the people that won't point out its flaws if there are any holes in the narrative?
Posted by RealDawg
Dawgville
Member since Nov 2012
11285 posts
Posted on 5/8/22 at 10:20 am to
quote:

Many ballot boxes were placed in high traffic areas. Using geospatial data to place a person within a couple of hundred feet of a ballot box in a high traffic area, on multiple occasions, does not constitute a crime.


Unless you have multiple boxes spread out across a broad area AND going near (stopping) at collection non profits AND video evidence matching.

Assuming they have the data they say..time will show if they stopped or not.

My guess is their biggest challenge is getting the video that is supposed to be public record.
Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
25805 posts
Posted on 5/8/22 at 11:35 am to
quote:

quote:
Free and fair elections are not guaranteed by the constitution. Every election is stolen and cannot be verified.

We need to work harder to steal the election better next time.


No. We need to expose it and ensure that moving forward we do establish free and fair elections.

Your thinking here is ridiculous.


Demprogs think that way. If they lose, they just think then need to cheat by any means possible.
Posted by Froman
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2007
38839 posts
Posted on 5/8/22 at 12:18 pm to
quote:

I will pay for 20 Sky Screamers to watch


Which ones? The Democrat or Republican sky screamers? Or 10 of each?
Posted by LSUbest
Coastal Plain
Member since Aug 2007
15619 posts
Posted on 5/8/22 at 1:25 pm to
Indisputable evidence!

We are a nation ran by a criminal cartel.
Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
49012 posts
Posted on 5/8/22 at 1:32 pm to
quote:

31 states allow for someone other than the voter drop off the ballot

And not one of them makes is legal to pay someone to drop of bundles of ballots which you did not yourself collect from the voter.

You would ok anything that the DEMocrat political thugs want to do.

And
quote:

Anyone who says Republicans don't use ballot havesters is flat out lying.

again - nobody is saying that GOP is perfect. absolutely NOBODY - but we are saying that the GOP uses methods other than public rioting, outright lies, concentrated racism, and voter fraud for their primary tactics.

Not ONE democrat politican will actually engage in a LOGICAL discussion of their agenda.

All you got are platitudes and outright lies and thuggery.,
Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
25805 posts
Posted on 5/8/22 at 1:34 pm to
quote:

Was that before or after they came out with them making this film? Either way it proves why making the film coming out this way is key.


The film just makes it easier for a lot more people to understand and see the evidence for themselves. We can read about what was done to track this, but to see it with video proof makes it a lot harder for it to be denied.
Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
49012 posts
Posted on 5/8/22 at 1:39 pm to
quote:

Unless you have multiple boxes spread out across a broad area AND going near (stopping) at collection non profits AND video evidence matching.


Yeah - these creeps refuse to address the true methodology used in this effort. They amassed trillions of bits of data, then sifted that to ID only those cells which met some very constrictive criteria
- had to visit over 10 drop boxes
- also had to visit over 5 NGO locations (the non-profits who were actually gathering up the ballots and filling them out)

there is absolutely no innocent explanation that would account for someone going from a NGO point directly to 3 or 4 drop boxes, then back o another NGO, and then to to 3 or 4 more drop boxes, then back to another NGO to repeat the process at another 3 or 4 drop boxes all in one night.

ESPECIALLY those who visited drop boxes in more than one precinct, or county, or even state.

And to have over 2000 of them meet this criteria - and that is only in the five critical areas in five states.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
62575 posts
Posted on 5/8/22 at 1:44 pm to
quote:

You righties are delusional about how lily white you think you are in political machinations.


Only one group is justifying election fraud.

Nothing more needs to be said.
Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
25805 posts
Posted on 5/8/22 at 1:48 pm to
quote:

quote:
Why such a high price?


It’s actually a very small price to pay if it saves this country.


I suspect that the price will come down in the coming weeks. Lower price = broader audience.
Posted by navy
Parts Unknown, LA
Member since Sep 2010
31878 posts
Posted on 5/8/22 at 2:11 pm to
The bitchute stream was flawless, even on our shitty internet.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
127458 posts
Posted on 5/8/22 at 2:15 pm to
Here’s another fella who hasn’t watched the movie.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
127458 posts
Posted on 5/8/22 at 2:17 pm to
quote:

Voter rolls aren’t cleaned up on purpose, it’s aids the cheating.

Correct. Wisconsin left thousands and thousands of ineligible voters on the rolls through the election. It’s not necessarily to allow illegal votes in those voters. It is to give space for other voters.

If they had removed them beforehand, they would have had like 95% of registered voters “voting” in the election.
This post was edited on 5/8/22 at 2:53 pm
Posted by MNCTigah
Member since Oct 2011
192 posts
Posted on 5/8/22 at 2:32 pm to
quote:

Here’s another fella who hasn’t watched the movie.


I watched it. However, I have a low tolerance for propagandist bullshite, regardless if it emanates from the left OR the right.
This post was edited on 5/8/22 at 2:33 pm
Posted by AUFanInSoCal
Orange County
Member since Nov 2007
1616 posts
Posted on 5/8/22 at 2:33 pm to
Dirty voter roles are the center point of election fraud. The evil-doers will certainly take advantage of that in the 2022 election.
Posted by FredBear
Georgia
Member since Aug 2017
17249 posts
Posted on 5/8/22 at 2:41 pm to
quote:

What does any of this have to do with the topic at hand?




That poster has a serious obsession with the Q stuff. Even now when it's been well over a year since that thread was scrapped. It's a bit bewildering
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
127458 posts
Posted on 5/8/22 at 2:52 pm to
quote:

I watched it.


Then why would you advance an argument against their data that doesn’t apply? You’re stupid?
Posted by MNCTigah
Member since Oct 2011
192 posts
Posted on 5/8/22 at 3:13 pm to
Anonymous accounts and "allusions" to metadata from a provider being that precise isn't evidence. Valley effects and multipath interference, especially in urban areas.

And then you have to suspend common sense for the buy in. If it was evidence, it would be in the hands of prosecutors.
Posted by Lakeboy7
New Orleans
Member since Jul 2011
28324 posts
Posted on 5/8/22 at 3:16 pm to
quote:

And then you have to suspend common sense for the buy in.


Man you are in the right place, over the target
Posted by texridder
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Oct 2017
14941 posts
Posted on 5/8/22 at 3:29 pm to
Only one group is justifying election fraud.

Only one group is making accusations of election fraud without evidence other than testimony from uncredentialed grifters.
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram