- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Saw 2000 Mules. Here is the easiest way to see it. Here is what I think.
Posted on 5/8/22 at 10:18 am to Landmass
Posted on 5/8/22 at 10:18 am to Landmass
quote:
You think people that don't want to see it will pay $20-30 to see it? Why such a high price?
Or maybe they know the people that will pay $30 to see it are the people that won't point out its flaws if there are any holes in the narrative?
Posted on 5/8/22 at 10:20 am to MNCTigah
quote:
Many ballot boxes were placed in high traffic areas. Using geospatial data to place a person within a couple of hundred feet of a ballot box in a high traffic area, on multiple occasions, does not constitute a crime.
Unless you have multiple boxes spread out across a broad area AND going near (stopping) at collection non profits AND video evidence matching.
Assuming they have the data they say..time will show if they stopped or not.
My guess is their biggest challenge is getting the video that is supposed to be public record.
Posted on 5/8/22 at 11:35 am to BoarEd
quote:
quote:
Free and fair elections are not guaranteed by the constitution. Every election is stolen and cannot be verified.
We need to work harder to steal the election better next time.
No. We need to expose it and ensure that moving forward we do establish free and fair elections.
Your thinking here is ridiculous.
Demprogs think that way. If they lose, they just think then need to cheat by any means possible.
Posted on 5/8/22 at 12:18 pm to bamadontcare
quote:
I will pay for 20 Sky Screamers to watch
Which ones? The Democrat or Republican sky screamers? Or 10 of each?
Posted on 5/8/22 at 1:25 pm to TSLG
Indisputable evidence!
We are a nation ran by a criminal cartel.
We are a nation ran by a criminal cartel.
Posted on 5/8/22 at 1:32 pm to texridder
quote:
31 states allow for someone other than the voter drop off the ballot
And not one of them makes is legal to pay someone to drop of bundles of ballots which you did not yourself collect from the voter.
You would ok anything that the DEMocrat political thugs want to do.
And
quote:
Anyone who says Republicans don't use ballot havesters is flat out lying.
again - nobody is saying that GOP is perfect. absolutely NOBODY - but we are saying that the GOP uses methods other than public rioting, outright lies, concentrated racism, and voter fraud for their primary tactics.
Not ONE democrat politican will actually engage in a LOGICAL discussion of their agenda.
All you got are platitudes and outright lies and thuggery.,
Posted on 5/8/22 at 1:34 pm to KAGTASTIC
quote:
Was that before or after they came out with them making this film? Either way it proves why making the film coming out this way is key.
The film just makes it easier for a lot more people to understand and see the evidence for themselves. We can read about what was done to track this, but to see it with video proof makes it a lot harder for it to be denied.
Posted on 5/8/22 at 1:39 pm to RealDawg
quote:
Unless you have multiple boxes spread out across a broad area AND going near (stopping) at collection non profits AND video evidence matching.
Yeah - these creeps refuse to address the true methodology used in this effort. They amassed trillions of bits of data, then sifted that to ID only those cells which met some very constrictive criteria
- had to visit over 10 drop boxes
- also had to visit over 5 NGO locations (the non-profits who were actually gathering up the ballots and filling them out)
there is absolutely no innocent explanation that would account for someone going from a NGO point directly to 3 or 4 drop boxes, then back o another NGO, and then to to 3 or 4 more drop boxes, then back to another NGO to repeat the process at another 3 or 4 drop boxes all in one night.
ESPECIALLY those who visited drop boxes in more than one precinct, or county, or even state.
And to have over 2000 of them meet this criteria - and that is only in the five critical areas in five states.
Posted on 5/8/22 at 1:44 pm to texridder
quote:
You righties are delusional about how lily white you think you are in political machinations.
Only one group is justifying election fraud.
Nothing more needs to be said.
Posted on 5/8/22 at 1:48 pm to Rebel80
quote:
quote:
Why such a high price?
It’s actually a very small price to pay if it saves this country.
I suspect that the price will come down in the coming weeks. Lower price = broader audience.
Posted on 5/8/22 at 2:11 pm to Auburn1968
The bitchute stream was flawless, even on our shitty internet.
Posted on 5/8/22 at 2:15 pm to MNCTigah
Here’s another fella who hasn’t watched the movie.
Posted on 5/8/22 at 2:17 pm to hnds2th
quote:
Voter rolls aren’t cleaned up on purpose, it’s aids the cheating.
Correct. Wisconsin left thousands and thousands of ineligible voters on the rolls through the election. It’s not necessarily to allow illegal votes in those voters. It is to give space for other voters.
If they had removed them beforehand, they would have had like 95% of registered voters “voting” in the election.
This post was edited on 5/8/22 at 2:53 pm
Posted on 5/8/22 at 2:32 pm to the808bass
quote:
Here’s another fella who hasn’t watched the movie.
I watched it. However, I have a low tolerance for propagandist bullshite, regardless if it emanates from the left OR the right.
This post was edited on 5/8/22 at 2:33 pm
Posted on 5/8/22 at 2:33 pm to the808bass
Dirty voter roles are the center point of election fraud. The evil-doers will certainly take advantage of that in the 2022 election.
Posted on 5/8/22 at 2:41 pm to BoarEd
quote:
What does any of this have to do with the topic at hand?
That poster has a serious obsession with the Q stuff. Even now when it's been well over a year since that thread was scrapped. It's a bit bewildering
Posted on 5/8/22 at 2:52 pm to MNCTigah
quote:
I watched it.
Then why would you advance an argument against their data that doesn’t apply? You’re stupid?
Posted on 5/8/22 at 3:13 pm to the808bass
Anonymous accounts and "allusions" to metadata from a provider being that precise isn't evidence. Valley effects and multipath interference, especially in urban areas.
And then you have to suspend common sense for the buy in. If it was evidence, it would be in the hands of prosecutors.
And then you have to suspend common sense for the buy in. If it was evidence, it would be in the hands of prosecutors.
Posted on 5/8/22 at 3:16 pm to MNCTigah
quote:
And then you have to suspend common sense for the buy in.
Man you are in the right place, over the target
Posted on 5/8/22 at 3:29 pm to moneyg
Only one group is justifying election fraud.
Only one group is making accusations of election fraud without evidence other than testimony from uncredentialed grifters.
Only one group is making accusations of election fraud without evidence other than testimony from uncredentialed grifters.
Popular
Back to top



0






