Domain: tiger-web1.srvr.media3.us Science is debunking itself again | Page 30 | Political Talk
Started By
Message

re: Science is debunking itself again

Posted on 9/24/23 at 8:21 am to
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
81102 posts
Posted on 9/24/23 at 8:21 am to
quote:

Who is this Roody-Poo?


He's a doctor.

Seriously, dude has an MD.
Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
46221 posts
Posted on 9/24/23 at 8:54 am to
quote:

Youre beyond help
He is certainly beyond human help.

He needs the work of the Holy Spirit to change him and save him through the gift of faith in Jesus Christ.
Posted by Squirrelmeister
Member since Nov 2021
3491 posts
Posted on 9/24/23 at 9:05 am to
quote:

Youre beyond help. The very definition of theory is an "unproved assumption", so if the assumption behind the theory is accepted as unproven, then the theory itself is unproven.


You admit you are a 9th grade dropout.

Due to your own incompetence, and me being a nice guy, I did the leg work for you. Look, I pulled this straight off the American museum of natural history’s homepage:

quote:

In everyday use, the word "theory" often means an untested hunch, or a guess without supporting evidence. But for scientists, a theory has nearly the opposite meaning. A theory is a well-substantiated explanation of an aspect of the natural world that can incorporate laws, hypotheses and facts. The theory of gravitation, for instance, explains why apples fall from trees and astronauts float in space. Similarly, the theory of evolution explains why so many plants and animals—some very similar and some very different—exist on Earth now and in the past, as revealed by the fossil record.


I am embarrassed for you.
Posted by onmymedicalgrind
Nunya
Member since Dec 2012
11974 posts
Posted on 9/24/23 at 9:31 am to
(no message)
This post was edited on 9/24/23 at 9:36 am
Posted by onmymedicalgrind
Nunya
Member since Dec 2012
11974 posts
Posted on 9/24/23 at 9:38 am to
quote:

He's a doctor. Seriously, dude has an MD.

Don’t forget my physics minor!!!
Posted by Squirrelmeister
Member since Nov 2021
3491 posts
Posted on 9/24/23 at 9:49 am to
quote:

Mother of god


He was nerding out on curving space-time.

Even when I was in school, 2000 and 3000 level physics taught gravity as a force. Even some recent papers I read referred to it as a force. I had no ideas before yesterday that it was now sometimes referred to as an “interaction” along with strong and weak nuclear “interactions” and magnetic “interactions”.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
81102 posts
Posted on 9/24/23 at 10:08 am to
quote:

Don’t forget my physics minor!!!


Noted.


Don't forget my philosophy minor.
Posted by onmymedicalgrind
Nunya
Member since Dec 2012
11974 posts
Posted on 9/24/23 at 10:08 am to
quote:

He was nerding out on curving space-time. Even when I was in school, 2000 and 3000 level physics taught gravity as a force. Even some recent papers I read referred to it as a force. I had no ideas before yesterday that it was now sometimes referred to as an “interaction” along with strong and weak nuclear “interactions” and magnetic “interactions”.


Practically speaking, it can be treated as a force. Theoretically, I don’t even consider it an “interaction.” I think it is more accurate to say objects simply move along geodesics.
This post was edited on 9/24/23 at 10:16 am
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 9/24/23 at 11:09 am to
Posted by dafif
Member since Jan 2019
8139 posts
Posted on 9/24/23 at 6:00 pm to
quote:

Look, I pulled this straight off the American museum of natural history’s homepage:


I really do not want to get in this fight but pulling something from the government is specious at best.

This same government puts this warning on cigarette packages "smoking causes cancer". So.. as the scientists on here know, that simply is not true.
This post was edited on 9/24/23 at 6:02 pm
Posted by SlimTigerSlap
Member since Apr 2022
4313 posts
Posted on 9/24/23 at 6:24 pm to
quote:

I really do not want to get in this fight but pulling something from the government is specious at best.

This same government puts this warning on cigarette packages "smoking causes cancer". So.. as the scientists on here know, that simply is not true.

Who is this candy arse?
Posted by Herooftheday
Member since Feb 2021
3830 posts
Posted on 9/24/23 at 6:51 pm to
quote:

Who is this candy arse?


A heavy smoker apparently
Posted by FutureMikeVIII
Houston
Member since Sep 2011
1666 posts
Posted on 9/24/23 at 7:06 pm to
quote:

This same government puts this warning on cigarette packages "smoking causes cancer". So.. as the scientists on here know, that simply is not true


Please expound. I wanna see this logic pretzel.
Posted by Squirrelmeister
Member since Nov 2021
3491 posts
Posted on 9/24/23 at 7:45 pm to
quote:

I really do not want to get in this fight but pulling something from the government is specious at best.


Go to any legitimate source that explains what a “scientific theory” is and you’ll find that it is defined as a basis for explanation of natural phenomena based on an overwhelming preponderance of observable evidence that has repeatedly tested and shown to be factually true.

It is the opposite of that idiot claiming a scientific theory is a guess, a hunch, without positive evidence to back the assertion. Evolution is not “just a theory”, rather it has been elevated to the highest level of scientific fact which is a “scientific theory”.
Posted by dafif
Member since Jan 2019
8139 posts
Posted on 9/24/23 at 9:04 pm to
quote:

A heavy smoker apparently

M ope, don't smoke at all but the statement I made is factual
Posted by dafif
Member since Jan 2019
8139 posts
Posted on 9/24/23 at 9:09 pm to
quote:

Evolution is not “just a theory”,


I'm not sure someone is arguing against evolution. Everything "evolves". It is my "perception " that man is currently evolving to go bald. I think we have almost lost the need for hair in the head.

I have posted before, the biggest issue that I see is the creation of a new species from another species

Given how nature works, I'm hoping for more proof that, as of now, we simply do not have. For that specific part, that is more theory than fact.
Posted by dafif
Member since Jan 2019
8139 posts
Posted on 9/24/23 at 9:11 pm to
quote:

Please expound. I wanna see this logic pretzel.


It's simple really, and not to get to far of topic but smoking does not CAUSE cancer.
Posted by FutureMikeVIII
Houston
Member since Sep 2011
1666 posts
Posted on 9/24/23 at 9:27 pm to
quote:

It's simple really, and not to get to far of topic but smoking does not CAUSE cancer.


Like in the same way that everyone dies from cardiac arrest? Because you are much more likely to get cancer as a smoker. That’s not some govt lie.
Posted by Herooftheday
Member since Feb 2021
3830 posts
Posted on 9/24/23 at 10:08 pm to
quote:

It's simple really, and not to get to far of topic but smoking does not CAUSE cancer.


Is that a long the same lines as "it's not the fall that kills you, it's the sudden stop"?
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
27166 posts
Posted on 9/24/23 at 10:17 pm to
quote:

I'm not sure someone is arguing against evolution.


I’m certainly not, but that’s the dishonest shell game they play. The parallels to the covidians are obvious.
Jump to page
Page First 28 29 30 31 32 ... 35
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 30 of 35Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram