- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 11/4/24 at 5:18 pm to Jon Ham
Can we stop talking about this lady? A pollster this morning blew up her poll. Selzer uses random digit dialing and she got caught in oversampling of Democrats. This is known Democrats answer the polls at higher rates. She didn’t weight her polls to adjust. This is pretty simple as to why Trump will win Iowa and her numbers are off.
This post was edited on 11/4/24 at 5:19 pm
Posted on 11/4/24 at 5:18 pm to Jon Ham
Whatta melt.
Let your balls drop, pussy.
Let your balls drop, pussy.
Posted on 11/4/24 at 5:18 pm to AmishSamurai
Yeah, the look on Halperin's face and his hesitation to speak was priceless. 
Posted on 11/4/24 at 5:19 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
Selzer
quote:Alka
Who?
Posted on 11/4/24 at 5:20 pm to Jon Ham
If you are trying to rationalize your way into a Kackles victory using polling you're wasting your time. The only way she wins is through fraud so until you find a poll that can measure the fraud none of this other shite matters.
Posted on 11/4/24 at 5:21 pm to Jon Ham
History means nothing when your newest poll is based on feels
Posted on 11/4/24 at 5:21 pm to Jon Ham
Why are we still talking about this? Yesterday’s news and there’s hundreds of other polls and data points to analyze
Posted on 11/4/24 at 5:26 pm to Jon Ham
Truth is nobody knows what’s going to happen. You choose one set of data, I raise you with a data point (of which there are many like it) like Gallup electorate being R+3 and how that has accurately predicted the election popular vote going back decades; I can easily say that if Trump wins the PV by 3, it’ll be an EC landslide.
Point is, this era is so unique. Buoyed by a candidate that is sui generis in an election season that saw a candidate installed 2.5 months before the vote. We simply don’t know.
Point is, this era is so unique. Buoyed by a candidate that is sui generis in an election season that saw a candidate installed 2.5 months before the vote. We simply don’t know.
This post was edited on 11/4/24 at 5:27 pm
Posted on 11/4/24 at 5:29 pm to DallasTiger11
quote:
Why are we still talking about this? Yesterday’s news and there’s hundreds of other polls and data points to analyze
He made a alter account yesterday after the same thread got anchored. This is his third time posting it
Posted on 11/4/24 at 5:29 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
Who?
Do we even need a background check?
Posted on 11/4/24 at 5:43 pm to Jon Ham
Dude what the frick is wrong with you?
That stupid bitch had zero clue what she was talking about and poll literally flies in the face actual data from every early voting state in the nation.
These last few days you have been a bigger cuck than HHTM! ever was. At least he paid attention to data.
That stupid bitch had zero clue what she was talking about and poll literally flies in the face actual data from every early voting state in the nation.
These last few days you have been a bigger cuck than HHTM! ever was. At least he paid attention to data.
This post was edited on 11/4/24 at 5:44 pm
Popular
Back to top


0







