- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: This is the Epstein email that broke me
Posted on 2/11/26 at 3:35 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 2/11/26 at 3:35 pm to SlowFlowPro
Your whole persona sucks
0
Posted on 2/11/26 at 3:36 pm to SlowFlowPro
Yeah that's why I leave it to you 
Posted on 2/11/26 at 3:43 pm to Pettifogger
The absolute weirdest part about this is that I have noticed that there is one Yuge exception to the interpretation stuff, and that's Trump.
Now I don't think Trump did anything illegal. He may, AT WORST, have banged some legal girls around JE and that would be on brand and fully legal. Full disclaimer so that people don't misinterpret what I'm saying. I'm 100% NOT implicating Trump in any illegality.
But we are 100% not allowed to do the interpretation stuff with anything that could be interpreted to apply to Trump. With Trump we have to have 100% rock solid, clear, direct, and credible evidence to implicate him. Anyone else? Jews making fun of Christians is a sign of murdering children, clearly.
Now I don't think Trump did anything illegal. He may, AT WORST, have banged some legal girls around JE and that would be on brand and fully legal. Full disclaimer so that people don't misinterpret what I'm saying. I'm 100% NOT implicating Trump in any illegality.
But we are 100% not allowed to do the interpretation stuff with anything that could be interpreted to apply to Trump. With Trump we have to have 100% rock solid, clear, direct, and credible evidence to implicate him. Anyone else? Jews making fun of Christians is a sign of murdering children, clearly.
Posted on 2/11/26 at 3:48 pm to SlowFlowPro
I think the (likely) distorted reality around Epstein contributes to that too
They convince themselves it's all spirit cooking and infants on the island and thus Trump can't possibly be adjacent to that
When in reality it was probably a mix of 18-25 year old Russian girls and 16 year of Giuffre types which is how Trump (and many, others, and mostly others, mind you) were able to reconcile continuing the relationship with Epstein for so long.
Truth is that I remain fully open to the idea that Epstein and others in his orbit are much worse than "just" grooming HS aged girls to exploit, but I haven't seen anything to indicate that's a reality.
They convince themselves it's all spirit cooking and infants on the island and thus Trump can't possibly be adjacent to that
When in reality it was probably a mix of 18-25 year old Russian girls and 16 year of Giuffre types which is how Trump (and many, others, and mostly others, mind you) were able to reconcile continuing the relationship with Epstein for so long.
Truth is that I remain fully open to the idea that Epstein and others in his orbit are much worse than "just" grooming HS aged girls to exploit, but I haven't seen anything to indicate that's a reality.
Posted on 2/11/26 at 4:14 pm to Pettifogger
quote:
When in reality it was probably a mix of 18-25 year old Russian girls and 16 year of Giuffre types which is how Trump (and many, others, and mostly others, mind you) were able to reconcile continuing the relationship with Epstein for so long.
Truth is that I remain fully open to the idea that Epstein and others in his orbit are much worse than "just" grooming HS aged girls to exploit, but I haven't seen anything to indicate that's a reality.
Yup
It just so happens that a lot of the, as you put it spirit cooking type, people are just rehashing old satanic Panic stuff that I've been debunking on here for 20 years or so. They just don't comprehend that because their frame of reference of this probably starts in 2019 at the earliest, and I don't think that they can even conceptualize what they're a part of and they clearly have no concept of history about this stuff
*ETA: and this is a crowd who probably doesn't even recognize the term Hermetic and, if they do, probably associates it with Crowley as the originator
This post was edited on 2/11/26 at 4:18 pm
Posted on 2/11/26 at 4:34 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Teens below 18? Yes. 100%
Children? No.
JFC - is it okay if some of us normal adults consider a 16 or 17 yo girl a child, particularly in the sense of sex involving someone substantially older?
quote:
To go from children to teens is just this
What a weird point to argue. Not a good look IMO.
quote:
Also to go from sexual abuse to murder is also this
I never did that. I pointed out that if you read that email like a non-pedophile might, connecting those dots wasn't outlandish. It's extreme - worst possible read - but not retarded.
Posted on 2/11/26 at 4:49 pm to SlowFlowPro
You and tompettyfogger get a room and discuss your lame sophomoric satanic panic. It is worse than chantards.
Good Lord, do you hear yourselves talk? Yall dont sound as intelligent and above all in intellect as you perceive.
WHOOPS 400 times in the JE files said around death scenarios and suicides...Are far more conducive to theory and basic common sense, then your lame satanic panic dissertations.
Good Lord, do you hear yourselves talk? Yall dont sound as intelligent and above all in intellect as you perceive.
WHOOPS 400 times in the JE files said around death scenarios and suicides...Are far more conducive to theory and basic common sense, then your lame satanic panic dissertations.
Posted on 2/11/26 at 4:51 pm to David_DJS
quote:
JFC - is it okay if some of us normal adults consider a 16 or 17 yo girl a child, particularly in the sense of sex involving someone substantially older?
That age is legal in just about every country.
Pedophile has a definition.
Why don't we just arrest all of Brazil then?
You calling someone a pedophile for having sex with a 17 year old just makes you wrong.
Prostitution across borders is called sex trafficking. The prostitute can be 45 years old, it's still sex trafficking.
This post was edited on 2/11/26 at 4:54 pm
Posted on 2/11/26 at 4:57 pm to dgnx6
quote:
You calling someone a pedophile for having sex with a 17 year old just makes you wrong.
First, I didn't call someone a pedo for having sex with a 17 yo. Kind of odd you fantasized something just to post that argument.
I called 16 and 17 yos children, which they are.
A child is technically defined legally as any human being under the age of majority, which is typically 18 in most jurisdictions. Under international law, the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child defines a child as anyone under 18.
Posted on 2/11/26 at 4:57 pm to cajunangelle
I’ll admit right up front I didn’t read every post.
Just my .02.
Saw an exorcist in an interview…..said Hollywood can’t even come close to the true horror of Hell.
W all this crap coming out, just imagine what God the Father is going to do to those people.
Just my .02.
Saw an exorcist in an interview…..said Hollywood can’t even come close to the true horror of Hell.
W all this crap coming out, just imagine what God the Father is going to do to those people.
Posted on 2/11/26 at 5:01 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Not trying to read this whole thread.
It's one of the dumbest interpretations of the Q crowd I've ever seen They're trying SO hard to salvage this devastating document dump
What do we think the email is about?
Posted on 2/11/26 at 5:19 pm to ReauxlTide222
quote:
What do we think the email is about?
Locker room sex talk and making fun of Christians
Posted on 2/11/26 at 5:21 pm to David_DJS
quote:
JFC - is it okay if some of us normal adults consider a 16 or 17 yo girl a child, particularly in the sense of sex involving someone substantially older?
Do you honestly think OP is referencing a 17 year old or an actual child?
Posted on 2/11/26 at 5:45 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Do you honestly think OP is referencing a 17 year old or an actual child?
I don't know who Epstein is referring to but if it's a 17 yo, it's a child.
Posted on 2/11/26 at 6:21 pm to David_DJS
Anyone who wants to argue semantics over Pedophile vs Ephebophile is either a currently registered sex offender or is likely to become one
Posted on 2/12/26 at 1:34 am to alabamabuckeye
Respectfully disagree w the above position.
Words have meaning. One of the main reasons the cultural rot has reached this level is the slow degradation of language.
The argument should always distinguish these categories if it reaches a certain depth.
Words have meaning. One of the main reasons the cultural rot has reached this level is the slow degradation of language.
The argument should always distinguish these categories if it reaches a certain depth.
Posted on 2/12/26 at 1:39 am to dgnx6
quote:
That age is legal in just about every country. Pedophile has a definition. Why don't we just arrest all of Brazil then? You calling someone a pedophile for having sex with a 17 year old just makes you wrong.
Yeah man have this argument with females in your family. I’m sure they will receive it well
EDIT: In addition, add the age of these frickers with technically legal in Brazil. Good luck
This post was edited on 2/12/26 at 1:41 am
Posted on 2/12/26 at 1:55 am to RIPMachoMan
Above post is historically practically indefensible.
Kaiser Franz Josef picked out his bride to be (Elisabeth) when she was 15. Not sure when the actual wedding was.
Point being, nobody chastised the Kaiser. I’d bet my life everybody around him said, “Great choice your Highness, I’d have picked her out as well!!”
This stuff has been going on forever.
Kaiser Franz Josef picked out his bride to be (Elisabeth) when she was 15. Not sure when the actual wedding was.
Point being, nobody chastised the Kaiser. I’d bet my life everybody around him said, “Great choice your Highness, I’d have picked her out as well!!”
This stuff has been going on forever.
Page 7 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News