- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Thoughts on 9/11
Posted on 9/11/18 at 11:45 am to berrycajun
Posted on 9/11/18 at 11:45 am to berrycajun
I know it will be explained away but those boxes with the label BB18 is a model number for fuse busses commonly used in demolition projects.
LINK
LINK
Posted on 9/11/18 at 11:54 am to berrycajun
quote:
I disagree. I don’t have the answers I crave, but I know these art students were shady as all ever. Watch the video. What was that for? I still don’t understand why they did this us, but it seems these students were the ones who wired the controlled demolition type of explosives. Who were they were working for?
This seems like a typical truther behavior. Take some odd behaviors and make them the central tenet of the conspiracy.
Posted on 9/11/18 at 11:56 am to GumboPot
quote:
I know it will be explained away but those boxes with the label BB18 is a model number for fuse busses commonly used in demolition projects.
Yeah, the CIA is so good that they rigged a 110 story building without being detected but forgot to take the demo fuses out of the original packaging. Once again, can't see the forest through the trees.
Posted on 9/11/18 at 12:20 pm to cahoots
quote:Wrong, the majority and I don't believe any of that. It's the loud minority that does. The rest of us aren't going to start threads about how we don't believe those things on a daily basis.
This forum believes Hillary killed Seth Rich, pizza parlor pedo rings, 9/11 was a conspiracy, and Obama wasn't born in America
We also don't buy Trump Russian collusion either.
Posted on 9/11/18 at 12:26 pm to upgrayedd
The CIA is so powerful but all of their plots are figured out by kids on the internet with Cheetos stained fingers.
Posted on 9/11/18 at 12:29 pm to saints5021
quote:It's essentially the cause of everything political that's happened since it happened. The meddling in the economy. The surveillance state. The wars. Everything. It's the justification for EVERYTHING. In this very real sense, the terrorists won a resounding victory. It's ridiculous how well those savages exploited our stupidity.
Thoughts on 9/11
Posted on 9/11/18 at 12:33 pm to berrycajun
quote:No, they didn't. Not at all.
anyone with eyes can see that the buildings fell EXACTLY like buildings do when they undergo controlled demolition
Posted on 9/11/18 at 12:38 pm to Jake88
quote:
The CIA is so powerful but all of their plots are figured out by kids on the internet with Cheetos stained fingers.
That's the thing...it's not figured out.
Posted on 9/11/18 at 12:39 pm to Jake88
quote:
The CIA is so powerful but all of their plots are figured out by kids on the internet with Cheetos stained fingers.
It's the same as Trump being an idiot and an evil genius at the same time
Posted on 9/11/18 at 12:43 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
Yeah, the CIA is so good that they rigged a 110 story building without being detected but forgot to take the demo fuses out of the original packaging.
We really can't argue that the federal government is nothing but incompetent boobs in one hand and on the other hand competent enough to put a man on the moon and build stealth bombers to carry small nuclear weapons developed by the federal government.
Posted on 9/11/18 at 12:46 pm to GumboPot
Taking fuses out of their original packaging when carrying out the biggest flag op of all time is pretty basic stuff. Even they wouldn't be that dumb.
Posted on 9/11/18 at 12:48 pm to GumboPot
Building 7 fell at free fall speed. There has yet to be an explanation for this. I would love it if someone in here could explain it to me
Posted on 9/11/18 at 12:49 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
Yeah, the CIA is so good that they rigged a 110 story building without being detected but forgot to take the demo fuses out of the original packaging. Once again, can't see the forest through the trees.
Fits right in with "Trump is a moron who isn't qualified to be President, but also he stole the election with the help of Putin, and did it in a way that no one can detect"
Posted on 9/11/18 at 12:52 pm to saints5021
God I love this board. Bankers, car salesmen and OT ballers are now experts at the highest level of modern building structures, steel tolerance levels, aircraft engineering and government deep state.
Please do us all a favor and go back to selling cars and loaning money.
Please do us all a favor and go back to selling cars and loaning money.
Posted on 9/11/18 at 12:54 pm to Pdubntrub
quote:
Building 7 fell at free fall speed. There has yet to be an explanation for this. I would love it if someone in here could explain it to me
If I sat and thought for more than 2 minutes I could come up with more....but how about the fact that there were charges set or walked into the buildings in the moments leading up to the planes flying into the TC?
I mean, if you've got loonies looking for 99 virgins in the air, you can damned sure have them on the ground.
Posted on 9/11/18 at 12:58 pm to HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
quote:
Fits right in with "Trump is a moron who isn't qualified to be President, but also he stole the election with the help of Putin, and did it in a way that no one can detect"
And "The deep state exists and had taken control of the highest levels of government but they are incompetent and did not think the American people could RISE UP AND ELECT DONALD J TRUMP TO DETHRONE THE CORRUPT GLOBALIST ELITE AND RESTORE FREEDOM TO AMERICA"
Its in all caps because i feel like you have to yell to really get the nationalist sheep thing going
This post was edited on 9/11/18 at 1:00 pm
Posted on 9/11/18 at 12:58 pm to geauxbrown
quote:
Please do us all a favor and go back to selling cars and loaning money.
Nope, do us all a favor and think for yourself. Why did building 7 fall at free fall speed? I don't know but I'm not giving our gment the benefit of the doubt, they lost that at Waco and Ruby Ridge with me. I don't know what happened but I won't believe it because the federal gment tells me I should. They haven't tried to explain why building 7 fell at free fall speed. Something regarding building 7 is being covered up.
Posted on 9/11/18 at 1:00 pm to HeyHeyHogsAllTheWay
There are a lot of strange circumstances surrounding 911.
Do I believe that the US Govt w/other allies orchestrated 911 for some nefarious purpose?
No
Do I think it is possible it was done by assets/countries that we are heavily involved with and/or financed - and those people slipped through and did it? And the govt had to cover it up?
Absolutely.
The whole “you can’t melt steel with jet fuel” argument has always bothered me. Given the right environment and airflow you can create very high temps in an enclosed space with almost any fuel. There are forges that use wood to meld steel - so I don’t get the argument.
Do I believe that the US Govt w/other allies orchestrated 911 for some nefarious purpose?
No
Do I think it is possible it was done by assets/countries that we are heavily involved with and/or financed - and those people slipped through and did it? And the govt had to cover it up?
Absolutely.
The whole “you can’t melt steel with jet fuel” argument has always bothered me. Given the right environment and airflow you can create very high temps in an enclosed space with almost any fuel. There are forges that use wood to meld steel - so I don’t get the argument.
Posted on 9/11/18 at 1:03 pm to geauxbrown
quote:
If I sat and thought for more than 2 minutes I could come up with more....but how about the fact that there were charges set or walked into the buildings in the moments leading up to the planes flying into the TC?
I mean, if you've got loonies looking for 99 virgins in the air, you can damned sure have them on the ground.
"The official hypothesis would have us believe that the authorities’ anticipation was “evidence-based,” a prediction made on the basis of assessing the damage and fires in WTC 7. However, when examined closely, the high degree of confidence and precision suggests that it was instead knowledge-based. In other words, someone at the scene had foreknowledge that WTC 7 was going to be brought down and began warning others in order to avoid casualties and to create the cover story of a fire-induced failure. Thus, the warnings were couched as an evidence-based prediction that the building would collapse due to structural damage and fire.
The view that the anticipation was knowledge-based rather than evidence-based is strongly supported by the following facts:
NIST’s “Probable Collapse Sequence” for WTC 7 consists of an unprecedented and undetectable series of structural failures that could not be predicted on the basis of observing structural damage (which NIST later claimed did not contribute to the collapse) and fires. If we assume NIST’s hypothesis to be true, there would be no reason to anticipate a total collapse, even within the seconds before it occurred. Based on NIST’s scenario, the event that the authorities predicted had an infinitesimal probability of occurring until just seconds before it did. At that point, an extremely improbable chain of events unfolded and made their prediction correct. Such a scenario is not plausible.
A number of buildings in the vicinity were on fire and sustained much greater damage from the destruction of WTC 1 and WTC 2. Yet authorities seized on WTC 7 as the one building that was certain to go down and established a safety zone around it.
The FEMA Building Performance Study concluded that the best hypothesis it could come up with had “only a low probability of occurrence.” 1 How were the authorities able to predict such a low-probability event?
Engineers were “stunned by what happened to 7 World Trade Center” and unable to explain it.2 Even as late as March 2006, NIST’s lead investigator told New York Magazine, “I don’t really know. We’ve had trouble getting a handle on building No. 7.” 3 How were the authorities able to predict an event that engineers would be unable to explain even four and half years later?
A CNN video captured both the sound of an explosion coming from WTC 7 and an emergency worker’s warning that WTC 7 was “about to blow up” just seconds before its destruction:
[Sound of explosion]. Unidentified voice: “You hear that?” Voice of emergency worker #1: “Keep your eye on that building, it’ll be coming down....” Voice of emergency worker #2: “Building is about to blow up, move it back.... Here we are looking back, there’s a building about to blow up. Flame and debris coming down.” 4
There are at least four accounts showing that a controlled demolition was being considered or planned (see David Restuccio, Indira Singh, Jeffrey Shapiro, and Larry Silverstein in Appendix B of Beyond Misinformation: What Science Says About the Destruction of World Trade Center Buildings 1, 2, and 7)."
LINK
Posted on 9/11/18 at 1:04 pm to saints5021
I went all over Europe in 1999. The sense of a police state was already prominent, with militarized police carrying automatic weapons being a common sight in most transportation facilities.
After 911, especially in Britain, it ramped up to a frightening degree and is getting worse all the time. There and here, governments seemed so locked and loaded to take massive measures in "response" to 9/11 that it really would not surprise me. It was definitely the perfect excuse to tighten their grip on surveillance, remove freedoms and in a counter-punch maneuver, set up a thought policing philosophy based on hatred of those who carried out the attacks.
An Orwellian masterpiece, planned or not.
After 911, especially in Britain, it ramped up to a frightening degree and is getting worse all the time. There and here, governments seemed so locked and loaded to take massive measures in "response" to 9/11 that it really would not surprise me. It was definitely the perfect excuse to tighten their grip on surveillance, remove freedoms and in a counter-punch maneuver, set up a thought policing philosophy based on hatred of those who carried out the attacks.
An Orwellian masterpiece, planned or not.
Popular
Back to top



1





